Code

code (code) Lacan borrows the term 'code' from Roman Jakobson's

theory of communication. Jakobson presents his opposition 'code vs mes-

sage' as an equivalent of Saussure's langue vs parole. However, Lacan draws

an important distinction between the concepts of LANGUAGE and code (see E,

84). Codes are the province of animal communication, not of intersubjective

communication. Whereas the elements of a language are SIGNIFIERs, the ele-

ments of a code are indices (see INDEX). The fundamental difference is that

there is a fixed bi-univocal (one-to-one) relationship between an index and its

referent, whereas there is no such relationship between a signifier and a

referent or between a signifier and a signified. Because of the bi-univocal

relation of indices and referents, codes lack what Lacan regards as the

fundamental feature of human languages: the potential for ambiguity and

equivocation (see Lacan, 1973b).

    Lacan is not always consistent in maintaining this opposition between code

and language. In the seminar of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the

elementary cell of the graph of desire, he designates one point as the code,

which he also designates as the place of the Other and the battery of signifiers.

In this case, it is clear that the term 'code' is being used in the same sense as

the term 'language', namely, to designate the set of signifiers available to the

subject.