Difference between revisions of "Delusion"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Delusion]]s (''délire'') are usually defined in [[psychiatry]] as firmly held | + | [[Delusion]]s ([[French]]: ''[[délire]]'') are usually defined in [[psychiatry]] as firmly held [[false]] [[belief]]s, inconsistent with the information available and with the beliefs of the subject's social group. |
| − | |||
| − | In | + | [[Delusion]]s are the central [[clinical]] feature of [[paranoia]], and can range from single ideas to complex networks of [[belief]]s. |
| − | Thus the delusion is not the 'illness' of paranoia itself; it is, on the contrary, the paranoiac's attempt to heal himself, to pull himself out of the breakdown of the symbolic universe by means of a [[substitute formation]]. | + | |
| − | As [[Freud]] commented in his work on [[Schreber]] | + | In [[Lacan]]ian terms, the [[paranoiac]] [[lack]]s the [[Name-of-the-Father]], and the [[delusion]] is the [[paranoiac]]'s attempt to fill the [[hole]] left in his [[symbolic]] universe by the [[absence]] of this primordial [[signifier]]. |
| − | Lacan insists on the significance of the delusion and stresses the importance of attending closely to the [[psychosis|psychotic]] patient's own account of his delusion. | + | |
| − | The delusion is a form of [[discourse]], and must therefore be understood as "a field of signification that has organised a certain signifier."<ref>S3 | + | Thus the [[delusion]] is not the 'illness' of [[paranoia]] itself; it is, on the contrary, the [[paranoiac]]'s attempt to heal himself, to pull himself out of the breakdown of the [[symbolic]] universe by means of a [[substitute formation]]. |
| − | For this reason all | + | |
| − | The paranoid | + | As [[Freud]] commented in his work on [[Schreber]]: |
| + | |||
| + | "What we take to be the pathological production, the delusional formation, is in reality the attempt at recovery, the reconstruction."<ref>Freud, 1911c: SE XII, 71</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Lacan]] insists on the significance of the [[delusion]] and stresses the importance of attending closely to the [[psychosis|psychotic]] [[patient]]'s own account of his [[delusion]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[delusion]] is a form of [[discourse]], and must therefore be understood as "a field of signification that has organised a certain signifier."<ref>{{S3}} p.121</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | For this reason all [[delusion]]al phenomena are "clarified in reference to the functions and structure of [[speech]]."<ref>{{S3}} p.310</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[paranoid]] [[delusion]]al construction may take many forms. | ||
| + | |||
One common form, the "delusion of persecution," revolves around the [[Other of the Other]], a hidden subject who pulls the strings of the [[big Other]] (the [[symbolic]] [[order]]), and who controls our thoughts, conspires against us, watches us, etc. | One common form, the "delusion of persecution," revolves around the [[Other of the Other]], a hidden subject who pulls the strings of the [[big Other]] (the [[symbolic]] [[order]]), and who controls our thoughts, conspires against us, watches us, etc. | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 26 June 2006
Delusions (French: délire) are usually defined in psychiatry as firmly held false beliefs, inconsistent with the information available and with the beliefs of the subject's social group.
Delusions are the central clinical feature of paranoia, and can range from single ideas to complex networks of beliefs.
In Lacanian terms, the paranoiac lacks the Name-of-the-Father, and the delusion is the paranoiac's attempt to fill the hole left in his symbolic universe by the absence of this primordial signifier.
Thus the delusion is not the 'illness' of paranoia itself; it is, on the contrary, the paranoiac's attempt to heal himself, to pull himself out of the breakdown of the symbolic universe by means of a substitute formation.
As Freud commented in his work on Schreber:
"What we take to be the pathological production, the delusional formation, is in reality the attempt at recovery, the reconstruction."[1]
Lacan insists on the significance of the delusion and stresses the importance of attending closely to the psychotic patient's own account of his delusion.
The delusion is a form of discourse, and must therefore be understood as "a field of signification that has organised a certain signifier."[2]
For this reason all delusional phenomena are "clarified in reference to the functions and structure of speech."[3]
The paranoid delusional construction may take many forms.
One common form, the "delusion of persecution," revolves around the Other of the Other, a hidden subject who pulls the strings of the big Other (the symbolic order), and who controls our thoughts, conspires against us, watches us, etc.
References
- ↑ Freud, 1911c: SE XII, 71
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.121
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.310
