[[Image:Sem8.jpg|thumb|right]]
1960-1961 * ''[[Seminar VIII|Le séminaire, Livre VIII: Le transfert (dans sa disparité subjective)]].<BR>French: (texte établi par Jacques, 1960-Alain Miller), Paris: Seuil, 19911961''. <BR>English: unpublished
In ''[[La relation d'objet]]'' [[Lacan]] provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of [[transference]] in the analytical [[cure]].
In ''[[La relation d'objet]]'' [[Lacan]] provided a way of understanding the paradoxical function of [[transference]] in the [[treatment|analytical cure]]. In its [[symbolic|symbolic dimension]] aspect ([[repetition]]) it helps the cure [[treatment]] to [[progress ]], by revealing the signifiers [[signifier]]s of the [[subject]]'s history. In its [[imaginary|imaginary dimension]] ([[love]] and [[love|hate]]) it acts as a [[resistance]] to the [[treatment]].
He argues that in its [[imaginary]] aspect ([[love]] and hate) it acts as a [[resistance]].
He uses [[Plato]]'s [[The Symposium]] to illustrate the rapport between [[analysand]] and [[analyst]]: Alcibiades compares Socrates to a box enclosing a precious object, ''agalma''.
---
Speech has an effect only after transference.
For Lacan {| class="it is from the position that transference bestows the analyst with that he intervenes in transference itself,toccolours" and style="transference is interpreted on the basis of and with the aid of transference itselffloat: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 0.5em 1em;" |+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1em;"||- style="vertical-align: top;"|style="background: #CCCCCC;" colspan="3" align=center|'''Download'''|- style="vertical-align: top;"|* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.11.17.pdf 1994.11.17.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.01.pdf 1994.12.01.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.06.pdf 1994.12.06.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1954.12.17.pdf 1994.12.17.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.12.pdf 1995.01.12.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.19.pdf 1995.01.19.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.01.26.pdf 1995.01.26.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.02.pdf 1995.02.02.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.09.pdf 1995.02.09.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.02.16.pdf 1995.02.16.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.02.pdf 1995.03.02.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.09.pdf 1995.03.09.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.16.pdf 1995.03.16.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.03.30.pdf 1995.03.30.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.12.pdf 1995.05.12.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.19.pdf 1995.05.19.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.05.25.pdf 1995.05.25.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.01.pdf 1995.06.01.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.08.pdf 1995.06.08.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.15.pdf 1995.06.15.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.22.pdf 1995.06.22.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireII/1955.06.29.pdf 1995.06.29.pdf]|}
[[Speech]] has an effect only after [[transference]]. For [[Lacan]] "it is from the position that transference bestows the analyst with that he intervenes in transference itself," and "transference is interpreted on the basis of and with the aid of transference itself." In "The direction of the treatment and the principles of its power" (''Écrits: A Selection'') [[Lacan ]] presented [[countertransference]] as a resistance of the analyst and raised the problem of the [[analyst]]'s [[desire]].
Here, subjective disparity becomes the rule establishing dissymmetry between the two protagonists vis-à-vis desire: what the patient will discover through the disappointment of transference love.
In training-analysis there will be a mutation in the economy of desire in the analyst-to-be: desire will be restructured, so that it will be stronger than passions.
[[Lacan ]] calls it the desire proper to the analyst.
---
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Works]]
__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__
