Changes

At the Rome Congress of Romance Language Psychoanalysts, on the [[{{Y}}|26th of September, 1953]], [[Lacan]] delivered a paper entitled "[[Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en psychana­lyse]]" ("[[The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis]]") -- today referred to as "[[The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis|Discours de Rome]]" ("[[The Function function and Field field of Speech speech and Language language in Psychoanalysis|Rome Discoursepsychoanalysis]]").<ref>"[[The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis|Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en psychana­lyse]]." ''[[Écrits]]''. Paris: Seuil, 1966: 237-322 ["[[The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis]]." Trans. [[Alan Sheridan]]. ''[[Écrits: A Selection]]''. London: Tavistock, 1977; New York: W.W. Nortion & Co., 1977: 30-113].</ref>This paper, often referred to as the [[Rome Discourse]] marked [[Lacan]]'s break with the analytic establishment and the [[formation]] of his own [[school]] of [[psychoanalytic theory|psychoanalytic thought]]. Also in 1953, [[Lacan]] and a group of colleagues left the '''''[[Société psychanalytique de Paris]]''''' ([[SPP]]) to form the '''''[[Société Française de Psychanalyse]]''''' ([[SFP]]). The [[The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis|Rome Discourse]] came to be seen as the founding document of the [[SFP]], and of a new direction in [[psychoanalysis]].

Also in 1953==Language==The paper, the founding statement of Lacanian theory, defines [[Lacanpsychoanalysis]] as a practice of [[speech]] and a group theory of colleagues left the [[speech|speaking]] [[subject]]. [[Psychoanalysis]], he asserts, is distinguished from other disciplines in that the [[analyst]] works on the [[subject]]'''''s [[Société psychanalytique de Parisspeech]]''''' (. He points out that [[SPPFreud]]) often referred to form [[language]], particularly when he was focusing on the '''''[[Société Française de Psychanalyseunconscious]]. After all, [[language]]''''' (is the "[[SFPtalking cure]])".

This ===Three Orders===The theory of the three interacting orders, the [[Symbolic]], the [[Imaginary]] and the [[Real]], first appears in detail in this paper. These orders can be conceived as different planes of existence which, often called though interconnected, are independent realities, each [[order]] being concerned with different functions. =====Imaginary=====The [[Imaginary]] [[order]] includes the field of [[phantasies]] and [[image]]s. It evolves out of the [[mirror stage]] but extends into the adult [[subject]]'s relationships with others. The prototype of the "Rome Report" or typical imaginary relationship is the "Reome Discourseinfant before the [[mirror]]," marked Lacanfascinated with its [[image]]. The [[Imaginary]] [[order]] also seems to include preverbal structures, for example, the various 'primitive'phantasies of children, psycotic and perverse patients. =====Symbolic=====The [[Symbolic]] [[order]] is concerned with the function of [[symbol]]s break with and symbolic systems. [[Language]] belongs to the [[Symbolic]] [[order]]. Is is through the symbolic order that the subject is constituted. The Real order is the most elusive of these categories, and is linked to the analytic establishment dimensions of sexuality and death. It seems to be the formation domain outside the subject. The Real is the domain of his own school the inexpressible, of psychoanalytic thoughtwhat cannot be spoken about, for it does not belong to language. It is the order where the subject meets with inexpressible enjoyment and death.

 __NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__