Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Superego

934 bytes added, 00:07, 21 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{Top}}surmoi{{Bottom}}
==Sigmund Freud==
The term "[[superego]]" does not appear until quite late in [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]], [[being]] first introduced in ''[[The Ego and the Id]]'' (1923).
It was in this [[work]] that [[Freud]] introduced his so-called "[[structural model]]", in which the [[psyche]] is [[divided]] into [[three]] [[agencies]]: the [[ego]], the [[id]] and the [[superego]].
The term "However, the [[concept]] of a [[moral agency]] which judges and censures the [[superegoego]]" does not appear until quite late can be found in [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]] long before he locates these functions in the [[superego]], being first introduced such as in ''The Ego and the Id'' (1923)his concept of [[censorship]].
It was in this work that ==Jacques Lacan==[[Lacan]]'s first [[discussion]] of the [[Freudsuperego]] introduced comes in his so-called "structural model", in which articule on the psyche is divided into three agencies: the ego, the id and the superego[[family]].
However, In this work he distinguishes clearly between the concept of a moral agency which judges [[superego]] and censures the '''[[ego can be found -ideal]]''', [[terms]] which [[Freud]] seems to use interchangeably in Freud's work long before he lcoates these funcitons in '[[The Ego and the superego, such as in his concept of censorshipId]]''.
--He argues that the primary function of the [[superego]] is to [[repress]] [[desire|sexual desire]] for the [[mother]] in the [[resolution]] of the [[Oedipus complex]].
LacanFollowing [[Freud]], he argues that the [[superego]] results from [[Oedipal]] [[identification]] with the [[father]], but he also refers to [[Kleinian psychoanalysis|Melanie Klein]]'s first discussion [[thesis]] on the [[maternal]] origins of an archaic [[form]] of the [[superego comes in her articule on the fmaily]].<ref>{{1938}} p.59-60</ref>
In this work he distinguishes clearly between ===Symbolic Law===When Lacan returns to the subject of the superego and in his 1953-4 [[seminar]]; he locates it in the [[ego-idealsymbolic|symbolic order]], terms which Freud seems as opposed to use interchaneably in ''The Ego and the Id[[imaginary|imaginary order]] of the [[ego]]: the [[superego]] is essentially located within the [[symbolic|symbolic plane]] of [[speech]].<ref>{{S1}} p.102</ref>
He argues that The [[superego]] has a close [[relationship]] with the primary function of the superego [[Law]], but this relationship is to repress sexual desire for the mother int he resolution of the Oedipus complexa paradoxical one.
Following Freud, he argues that On the superego results from Oedipal identification with the fatherone hand, but he also refers to Melanie Klein's thesis on the maternal origins of an archaic ofrm of the superego.<ref>{{L}} o.1938. p[[Law]] as such is a [[symbolic]] [[structure]] which regualtes [[subjectivity]] and in this [[sense]] prevents disintegration.59-60</ref>
---On the other hand, the [[law]] of the superego has a "[[senseless]], blind [[character]], of pure imperativeness and simple tyranny.<ref>{{S1}} p. 102</ref>
When <blockquote>Thus "the superego is at one and the same [[Lacantime]] returns to the subject of the superego in his 1953-4 seminar; he locates it in the symbolicorder, as opposed to the imaginary order of the ego: the superego is essentially located within the symbolic plane of speechlaw and its [[destruction]]."<ref>{{S1}} p.102</ref></blockquote>
The superego ahs a close relationship arises from the misunderstanding of the [[law]], from the [[gap]]s in the [[symbolic]] [[chain]], and fills out those [[gap]]s with an [[imaginary]] [[substitute]] that distorts the Law, but this relationship is a paradoxical one[[law]].<ref>{{E}} p.143</ref>
On the one hand===Philosophy===More specifically, in [[linguistic]] terms, "the Law as such superego is a symbolic structure which regualtes subjectivity and in tis sense prevents disintegrationan imperative."<ref>{{S1}} p.102</ref>
On the In 1962, [[Lacan]] argues that this is none other hand, than the law of the superego has a "senseless, blidn character, of pure imperativeness and simple tyranny.<ref>{{S1}} p[[Kant]]ian [[categorical imperative]].102</ref>
Thus The specific imperative involved is the command "Enjoy!"; the [[superego ]] is at one and the same time [[Other]] insofar as the [[Other]] commands the law and its destruction."<ref>{{S1}} p[[subject]] to [[enjoy]].102</ref>
The [[superego]] arises from is thus the misunderstanding expression of the law[[superego|will-to-enjoy]] (''volonte de jouissance''), from which is not the gaps in [[subject]]'s own will but the will of the symbolic chian[[Other]], and fills out those gaps with an imaginary substitute that distorts who assumes the lawform of [[Sade]]'s "Supreme Being-in-[[Evil]]."<ref>{{EEc}} p.143773</ref>
The [[superego]] is an "[[obscene]], ferocious [[Figure]]"<ref>{{E}} p. 256</ref> which imposes "a senseless, destructive, purely oppressive, almost always anti---legel [[morality]]" on the [[neurotic]] [[subject]].<ref>{{S1}} p. 102</ref>
More specificallyThe [[superego]] is related to the [[voice]], in linguistic terms, "and thus to the superego is an imperative."<ref>{{S1}} pinvoking [[drive]] and to [[sadism/masochism]].102</ref>
In 1962, ==See Also=={{See}}* [[LacanEgo]] argues that this is none other than the Kantian categorical imperative.* [[Desire]]||* [[Drive]]* [[Id]]||* [[Identification]]* ''[[Jouissance]]''||* [[Law]]* [[Oedipus complex]]||* [[Philosophy]]* [[Repression]]||* [[Structure]]* [[Symbolic]]{{Also}}
The specific imperative involved is the command ==References==<div style="Enjoy!font-size:11px"; the superego is the Other insofar as the Other commands the subject to enjoy.class="references-small"><references/></div>
The superego is thus the expression of the will-to-enjoy (volonte de jouissance''), which is not the subject's own will but the will of the Other, who assumes the form of Sade's 'Supreme Being-in-Evil."<ref>{{EcOK}} p.773</ref>
The [[superego]] is an "obscene, ferocious FIgure"<ref>{{E}} p.256</ref> which imposes "a senseless, destructive, purely oppressive, almost always anti-legel morality" on the [[neurotic]] [[subject]].<ref>{{s1}} p.102</ref> The [[superego]] is related to the [[voice]], adn thus to the invoking drive and to sadism/masochism.__NOTOC__
Anonymous user
Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/Special:MobileDiff/11274...44474"

Navigation menu