Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Subject

815 bytes added, 23:58, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{Top}}[[sujet]]{{Bottom}}
=====Jacques Lacan=====The term "[[subject]]" (is [[Frpresent]] from the very earliest of [[Lacan]]. 's [[psychoanalytic]] writings,<ref>{{1932}}</ref> and from 1945 on it occupies a central part in [[Lacan]]'s [[sujetwork]]'').
The term "This is a distinctive feature of [[subjectLacan]]" is present from 's work, since the very earliest term does not constitute part of [[LacanFreud]]'s psychoanalytic writings[[theoretical]] [[vocabulary]],<ref>Lacanbut is more associated with [[philosophical]], 1932</ref> [[legal]] and from 1945 on it occupies a central part in [[Lacanlinguistic]] [[discourse]]'s work.
This is a distinctive feature of =====Human Being=====In [[Lacan]]'s workpre-war papers, since the term does not constitute part of "[[Freudsubject]]'s theoretical vocabulary, but is " seems to mean no more associated with [[philosophical]], [[legal]] and [[linguistic]] [[discourse]]sthan "human being."<ref>{{Ec}} p.75</ref>
--=====Analysand=====The term is also used to refer to the [[analysand]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 83</ref>
=====Three Kinds=====In 1945, [[Lacan]]'s pre-war papers, the term "distinguishes between [[three]] kinds of [[subject]]" seems to mean no more than "human being."<ref>{{Ec}} p.75</ref>
The term is also used to refer to the [[analysand]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.83</ref> --- In 1945, [[Lacan]] distinguishes between three kinds of [[subject]].  # Firstly, there is the impersonal [[subject]], independent of the [[other]], the pure [[grammatical ]] [[subject]], the noetic [[subject]], the "it" of "it is known that."
# Secondly, there is the anonymous reciprocal [[subject]] who is completely equal to and substitutable for any other, and who recognises himself in equivalence with the other.
# Thirdly, there is the personal [[subject]], whose uniqueness is constituted by an act of [[self]]-[[affirmation]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.207-8</ref> It is always this third sense of the [[subject]], the [[subject]] in his uniqueness, that constitutes the focus of [[Lacan]]'s work.
--It is always this [[third]] [[sense]] of the [[subject]], the [[subject]] in his uniqueness, that constitutes the focus of [[Lacan]]'s work.
=====Subject and Ego=====In 1953, [[Lacan]] establishes a [[distinction ]] between the [[subject ]] and the [[ego]] which will remain one of the most fundamental distinctions throughout the rest of his work.
Whereas the [[ego]] is part of the [[imaginary order]], the [[subject]] is part of the [[symbolic]].
Thus the [[subject]] is not simply equivalent to a [[conscious]] sense of [[agency]], which is a mere [[illusion ]] produced by the [[ego]], but to the [[unconscious]]; [[Lacan]]'s "[[subject]]" is the [[subject]] of the [[unconscious]].
=====Sigmund Freud=====
[[Lacan]] argues that this distinction can be traced back to [[Freud]]:
<blockquote>"[Freud] wrote ''[[Das Ich ]] und [[das Es]]'' in [[order ]] to maintain this fundamental distinction between the [[true ]] [[subject of the unconscious ]] and the ego as constituted in its nucleus by a series of [[alienating ]] identifications.<ref>{{E}} p.128</ref></blockquote>
Although [[psychoanalytic treatment]] has powerful effects on the [[ego]], it is the [[subject]], and not the [[ego]], on which [[psychoanalysis]] primarily operates.
---=====Alternative Meanings=====[[Lacan]] plays on the various [[meanings ]] of the term "[[subject]]."  In [[linguistics]] and [[logic]], the [[subject]] of a proposition is that about which something is predicated, and is also opposed to the "object."<ref>Lacan. 1967. p.19</ref>
In [[Lacanlinguistics]] and [[logic]] plays on , the [[philosophicalsubject]] nuances of the latter term to emphasise a proposition is that his concept of the [[subjectabout]] concerns those aspects of which something is predicated, and is also opposed to the "[[humanobject]] ."<ref>{{L}} "[[beingWorks of Jacques Lacan|Proposition du 9 octobre 1967 sur le psychanalyste de l'École]] that cannot (or must not) be objectified (reified, reduced to a thing)" 1967, nor be studied in an 'objective' way[[Scilicet]]'', no. 1 ([[1968]]) p.19</ref>
<blockquote>"What do we call a subject? Quite precisely, what in [[Lacan]] plays on the [[philosophical]] nuances of the development latter term to emphasise that his [[concept]] of objectivation, is outside the [[subject]] concerns those aspects of the object."<ref>{{S1}} p[[human]] [[being]] that cannot (or must not) be objectified (reified, reduced to a [[thing]]), nor be studied in an '[[objective]]' way.194</ref></blockquote>
---<blockquote>"What do we call a subject? Quite precisely, what in the [[development]] of objectivation, is [[outside]] of the object."<ref>{{S1}} p. 194</ref></blockquote>
=====Language=====
References to [[language]] come to dominate [[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[subject]] from the mid-1950s on.
He distinguishes the [[subject]] of the [[statement]] from the [[subject]] of the [[enunciation]] to show that because the [[subject]] is essentially a [[speaking]] [[being]] (''[[parlêtre]]''), he is inescapably [[divided]], [[castrated]], [[split]].
In the early 1960s [[Lacan]] defines the [[subject]] as that which is represented by a [[signifier]] for [[another ]] [[signifier]]; in other [[words]], the [[subject]] is an effect of [[language]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.835</ref>. ---  Besides its place in [[linguistics]] and [[logic]], the term "[[subject]]" also has [[philosophical]] and [[legal]] connotations.  In [[philosophical]] [[discourse]], it denotes an individual self-[[consciousness]], whereas in [[legal]] [[discourse]], it denotes a person who is under the power of another (e.g. a person who is subject to the sovereign).
The fact that =====Philosophy and Law=====Besides its [[place]] in [[linguistics]] and [[logic]], the term possesses both these meanings means that it perfectly illustrates "[[Lacansubject]]'s thesis about the determination of " also has [[consciousnessphilosophical]] by the and [[symbolic orderlegal]]connotations.
<blockquote>"The subject In [[philosophical]] [[discourse]], it denotes an [[individual]] [[consciousness|self-consciousness]], whereas in [[legal]] [[discourse]], it denotes a person who is under the [[power]] of another (e.g. a person who is subject only by virtue of his subjection to the field of the Other."<ref>{{S2}} psovereign).188</ref></blockquote>
The fact that the term also functions in possesses both these meanings means that it perfectly illustrates [[legalLacan]] 's [[discoursethesis]] to designate about the support determination of action; the [[subjectconsciousness]] is one who can be held by the [[responsibility|responsiblesymbolic order]] for his [[act]]s.
----<blockquote>"The subject is a subject only by virtue of his subjection to the field of the Other."<ref>{{S2}} p. 188</ref></blockquote>
The term also functions in [[legal]] [[philosophicaldiscourse]] connotations to designate the support of the term are particularly emphasised by [[Lacanaction]], who links it with ; the [[Descartessubject]]'s is one who can be held [[philosophyresponsibility|responsible]] of the ''for his [[cogitoact]]'': s.
<blockquote>in the term =====Descartes's ''subjectCogito'' . . . I am not designating =====The [[philosophical]] connotations of the living substratum needed term are particularly emphasised by this phenomenon of the subject[[Lacan]], nor any sort who [[links]] it with [[Descartes]]'s [[philosophy]] of substance, nor any being possessing knowledge in his pathos . . . nor even some incarnated logos, but the Cartesian subject, who appears at the moment when doubt is recognised as certainty.<ref>{{S11}} p.126</ref></blockquote>''[[cogito]]'':
--<blockquote>in the term ''subject'' . . . I am not designating the [[living]] substratum needed by this phenomenon of the subject, nor any sort of substance, nor any being possessing [[knowledge]] in his pathos . . . nor even some incarnated [[logos]], but the [[Cartesian]] subject, who appears at the [[moment]] when [[doubt]] is recognised as [[certainty]].<ref>{{S11}} p. 126</ref></blockquote>
=====Subject of the Unconscious=====
The fact that the [[symbol]] of the [[subject]], '''S''', is a homophone of the [[Freud]]'s term ''[[Es]]'' ('[[Id]]') illustrates that for [[Lacan]], the true [[subject]] is the [[subject]] of the [[unconscious]].
In 1957 [[Lacan]] strikes through this [[symbol]] to produce the [[symbol]] '''$''', the "[[subject|barred subject]]," thus illustrating the fact that the [[subject]] is essentially [[divided]].
 =====See Also====={{See}}* [[Analysand]]
* ''[[Cogito]]''
||
* [[Enunciation]]
* [[Ego]]
||
* [[Language]]
* [[Law]]
||
* [[Linguistics]]
* [[Philosophy]]
||
* [[Split]]
* [[Statement]]
||
* [[Symbol]]
* [[Unconscious]]
{{Also}}
===== References =====<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu