Changes
The Act
,The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{TopTopp}}[[acte]]{{Bottom}}[[Image:Kida_a.gif |right|frame]]
=Jacques Lacan=
==Behavior==
An "[[Lacanact]] draws a distinction between " is not mere "[[act|behavior]]" -- which such as that of all '''[[nature|animals engage in ]]''' -- and an but a uniquely [[act|''human'' act]], "since to our [[actsknowledge]]" -- which are there is no [[symbolicother]] and can only be ascribed to [[humanact]] but the [[subjectshuman]]one."<ref>{{S11}} p.50</ref>
==ResponsibilityEthics of Psychoanalysis==A fundamental quality of an The "[[act]] " is that the actor can be held an '''[[responsibleethics|ethical concept]] for it; the concept of ''' insofar as the '''[[actsubject]] is thus an ''' can be held '''[[ethical]] [[conceptresponsibility|responsible]]''' for it.
The [[psychoanalytic]] [[concept ]] of '''[[responsibility]] ''' is complicated in [[psychoanalysis]] by the discovery that, in addition to his [[conscious]] plans, the '''[[subject]] ''' also has '''[[unconscious]] [[intention]]s'''. Hence someone may well commit an [[act]] which he claims was un[[intention]]al, but which [[analysis]] reveals to be the expression of an '''[[unconscious]] [[desire]]'''.
==Analysand==In '''[[Freudpsychoanalytic]] called these [[acttreatment]]''' the [[subject]] is faced with the '''[[ethical]] [[duty]]''' of assuming '''[[responsibility]]''' even for the '''[[unconscious]]s "[[parapraxesdesire]]," or "s''' expressed in his '''[[bungled actionsaction]]s'''."
==ResponsibilityAnalyst==In The '''[[psychoanalyticethics]] of [[treatmentpsychoanalysis]] ''' enjoin the [[subject]] is faced with the [[ethical]] [[dutyanalyst]] of assuming to assume [[responsibility]] even for the his or her [[unconscious]] [[desireact]]s expressed (i.e. interventions in his the [[actiontreatment]]s).
[[Lacan]] dedicates a year of his [[seminar]] to discussing further the [[nature]] of the [[act|psychoanalytic act]].<ref>[[Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. ''[[Seminar XI|Le Séminaire. Livre XV. L'acte psychanalytique, 1967-68]]''. Unpublished.</ref> ==Ethics of PsychoanalysisConclusion==The A '''[[ethicsbungled action]] ''' is, as has been stated, successful from the point of view of the [[unconscious]]. Nevertheless, this success is only [[partial]] because the [[unconscious]] [[desire]] is expressed in a distorted [[psychoanalysisform]] enjoin . It follows that, when it is fully and [[conscious]]ly assumed, "[[suicide]] is the only completely successful act."<ref>[[analystLacan|Lacan, Jacques]] . ''[[Television|Télévision]]'', [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1973. ''[[Television|Television: A Challenge to assume the Psychoanalytic Establishment]]'', ed. [[responsibilityJoan Copjec]] for his or her , trans. Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss and Annette Michelson, New York: Norton, 1990]. p.66-7</ref> The [[act]]s expresses completely an [[intention]] which is both [[conscious]] and [[unconscious]], the [[conscious]] assumption of the '''[[unconscious]] [[death drive]]''' (ion the other hand, a sudden impulsive suicide attempt is not a true [[act]], but probably a '''[[passage to the act]]''').e. interventions The '''[[death drive]]''' is thus closely connected with the [[ethics|ethical domain]] in the [[treatmentLacan]]'s [[thought]]).
= In the work of Slavoj Žižek =The Act (also referred to as an ethical Act or authentic Act) is a foundational concept in Žižek’s [[philosophy]] and serves as the key to [[analystunderstanding]] must be guided (the [[political]] and ethical dimensions of his thought. Th e term first appears in these interventions) ''[[The Sublime Object of Ideology]]'', where Žižek distinguishes pragmatic-political [[acts]] from the more [[formal]] “act before act”, by an appropriate which the subject “[[structures]] his [[perception]] of the [[world]] in advance in a way that opens the [[desirespace]]for his intervention”, and which allows him [[retroactively]] to posit the very presuppositions of his [[activity]] (''SO'': 247). It is this [[Hegelian]] concept of “positing the presuppositions” that Žižek revisits throughout his oeuvre, combining it with [[Lacanian]] psychoanalysis and the philosophy of [[Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling]] to conceive of the Act within a formal [[structure]] of [[paradox]]. “An act accomplishes what, within the given symbolic [[Lacanuniverse]] calls , appears to be ‘impossible’, yet it changes its [[conditions]] so that it creates retroactively the conditions of its own possibility” (''CHU'': 121). An Act short-circuits the realms of [[contingency]] and [[necessity]], immanence and transcendence, [[desire politics]] and ethics and [[cause]] and effect, for it is made without strategic calculations or consideration of outcomes; it opens a [[moment]] when absolute [[freedom]] coincides with an unconditional necessity, a moment when the analystsubject is suspended between its [[being]] and [[meaning]].
Because an Act is grounded only in itself, it appears as mad or even monstrous according to the norms of the socio-[[Lacansymbolic order]] dedicates a year of his ; but once enacted it serves to reconfigure what is taken as mad, ethical and even [[seminarreal]] to discussing further . Thus: <blockquote>act is therefore not “abyssal” in the nature [[sense]] of the an [[irrational]] gesture that eludes all [[rational]] criteria; it can and should be judged by [[act|psychoanalytic actuniversal]]rational criteria, the point is only that it changes (re-creates) the very criteria by which it should be judged … it does more than intervene in reality in the sense of “having actual consequences” – it redefines what counts as reality.(T?: 171–2)<ref/blockquote>But an Act does even more than [[Lacan|Lacanchange]] what counts as reality, Jacquesbecause it further exposes how reality itself is not totally ontologically [[complete]]. ''Th at is, at its most fundamental, an Act reveals a deadlock or [[inconsistency]] at the core of the socio-symbolic order; it exposes how reality is [[Seminar XI|Le Séminairesplit]] from within. Livre XVOr, in Žižek’s [[words]], “an act disturbs the symbolic field into which it intervenes not out of nowhere, but precisely from the standpoint of this inherent [[impossibility]], stumbling block, which is its hidden, disavowed [[structuring]] principle” (''CHU'': 125). L'acte psychanalytiqueŽižek offers te example of Tito, 1967who in [[1948]] declared [[Yugoslavia]] a non-68aligned [[state]] and thus accomplished “the impossible”, for his Act revealed a crack in the Stalinist world [[communist]]movement by [[another]] communist (''E!'': 46). UnpublishedSimilarly, Lenin’s [[contingent]] Act of [[revolution]] in [[Russia]] in 1917 opened the space (retroactively) to mobilize the [[working]] [[class]] to form a new majority under [[communism]] and exposed the exploitation of the previous Tsarist rule (''LC'': 311).</ref>
==See Also==
{{See}}||
* [[Analyst]]
* [[Consciousness]]
||
* [[Ethics]]
* [[Inherent transgression]]
* [[Law]]
||
* [[Schelling]]
* [[Subject]]
* [[Symbolic]]
||
* [[Treatment]]
* [[Unconscious]]{{Also}} == References ==<references/> [[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]]{{OK}}
[[Category:Practice]]
[[Category:Treatment]]
[[Category:Zizek Dictionary]][[Category:Concepts]][[Category:Terms]]{{OK}}__FORCETOC____NOTOC__<references />