Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Code

602 bytes added, 04:11, 24 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
{{Top}}codes|code{{Bottom}}
=====Roman Jakobson=====
[[Lacan]] borrows the term "[[code]]" from [[Roman Jakobson]]'s [[theory]] of [[communication]].
[[Jacques LacanJakobson]] borrows the term 'presents his opposition "[[code]]vs [[message]]" as an equivalent of [[Saussure]]'s '' from [[Roman Jakobsonlangue]]'s theory of ' vs ''[[communicationparole]]''.
[[Jakobson]] presents his opposition 'code vs message' as an equivalent of [[Saussure]]'s ''[[langue]]'' vs ''[[parole]]''.=====Jacques Lacan==========Code and Language=====However, [[Lacan]] draws an important [[distinction ]] between the [[concepts ]] of [[language]] and [[code]].<ref>see {{E, }} p. 84</ref>
[[Code]]s are the province of [[animal]] [[communication]], not of [[intersubjectivity|intersubjective ]] [[communication]].
=====Index and Signifier=====Whereas the elements of a [[language]] are [[signifier]]s, the elements of a [[code]] are ''[[indices]]''.
The fundamental difference is that there is a fixed bi-univocal (one-to-one) relationship between an [[index]] and its [[referent]], whereas there is no such relationship between a [[signifier]] and a [[referent]] or between a [[signifier]] and a [[signified]].
=====Ambiguity and Equivocation=====Because of the bi-univocal relation of [[indices]] and [[referent]]s, [[code]]s [[lack ]] what [[Lacan]] regards as the fundamental feature of [[human]] [[language]]s: the potential for ambiguity and equivocation.<ref>see {{L}} (1973b) "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|L'Étourdit]]", ''[[Scilicet]]'', 1973bno. 4, 1973. pp. 5-52</ref>
<ref>[[Lacan ]] is not always consistent in maintaining this opposition between [[code ]] and language. In the seminar of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the elementary cell of the [[graph of desirelanguage]], he designates one point as the code, which he also designates as the place of the Other and the battery of signifiers. In this case, it is clear that the term 'code' is being used in the same sense as the term 'language', namely, to designate the set of signifiers available to the subject.</ref>
In the [[seminar]] of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the [[elementary cell]] of the [[graph of desire]], he designates one point as the [[code]], which he also designates as the [[place]] of the [[Other]] and the battery of [[signifier]]s.
 
In this [[case]], it is clear that the term "[[code]]" is [[being]] used in the same [[sense]] as the term "[[language]]," namely, to designate the set of [[signifier]]s available to the [[subject]].
==See Also==
{{See}}
* [[Communication]]
* [[Index]]
||
* [[Intersubjectivity]]
* [[Language]]
||
* [[Signified]]
* [[Signifier]]
{{Also}}
==References==
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
 
 
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Language]]
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:OK]]
 
__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu