Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Defence

646 bytes added, 05:14, 24 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
{{TopTopp}}défense{{Bottom}}
==Sigmund Freud==
From his earliest works, [[Freud]] situated the [[concept]] of [[defence]] at the heart of his [[theory]] of [[neurosis]].
From his earliest works, [[FreudDefence]] situated refers to the concept reaction of the [[defenceego]] at to certain interior stimuli which the heart of his theory of [[neurosisego]]perceives as dangerous.
==Defense Mechanisms==Although [[DefenceFreud]] refers later came to the reaction argue that there were different "mechanisms of defence" in addition to [[repression]],<ref>{{F}} ''[[Works of Sigmund Freud|The Question of Lay-Analysis]]'', 1926d. [[SE]] XX, 179</ref> he makes it clear that [[repression]] is unique in the [[egosense]] to certain interior stimuli which that it is constitutive of the [[egounconscious]] perceives as dangerous.
Although [[Anna Freud]] later came attempted to argue that there were different "mechanism classify some of defence" these mechanisms in addition to [[repression]],<ref>her book ''[[Anna Freud]]. 1926d.</ref> he makes it clear that [[repression]] is unique in |The Ego and the sense that it is constitutive Mechanisms of the [[unconsciousDefence]]'' (1936).
==Jacques Lacan==[[Lacan]] is very critical of the way in which [[Anna Freud]] attempted to classify some of these mechanisms in her book ''The Ego and [[ego-psychology]] [[interpret]] the Mechanisms concept of Defence'' (1936)[[defence]].
==More==He argues that they confuse the concept of [[defence]] with the concept of [[resistance]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 335</ref>
For this [[Lacanreason]] is very critical of the way in which , [[Anna FreudLacan]] and urges caution when discussing the concept of [[ego-psychologydefence]] interpret the , and prefers not to center his concept of [[defencepsychoanalytic treatment]]around it.
He argues that they confuse ==Resistance==When he does discuss [[defence]], he opposes it to [[resistance]]; whereas [[resistances]] are transitory [[imaginary]] responses to intrusions of the concept [[symbolic]] and are on the side of defence with the concept [[object]], defences are more permanent [[symbolic]] [[structure]]s of [[resistancesubjectivity]] (which [[Lacan]] usually calls [[fantasy]] rather than [[defence]]).<ref>{{Ec}} p.335</ref>
For this reason, This way of distinguishing between [[resistance]] and [[defence]] is quite different from that of [[other]] [[Lacanschool]] urges caution when discussing the concept s of [[psychoanalysis]], which, if they have distinguished between [[defence]]and [[resistance]] at all, have generally tended to [[regard]] [[defence]]s as transitory phenomena and prefers not to center his concept of [[psychoanalytic treatmentresistance]]s as more [[stable]] around it.
When he does discuss ==Desire and Defence==The opposition between [[defence]], he opposes it to [[resistance]]; whereas [[resistances]] are transitory imaginary responses to intrusions of the [[symbolicdesire]] and are on the side of the [[objectdefence]]is, defences are more permanent [[symbolic]] [[structure]]s of [[subjectivity]] (which for [[Lacan]] usually calls [[fantasy]] rather than , a [[defencedialectic]])al one.
This way of distinguishing between Thus he argues in 1960 that, like the [[resistanceneurotic]] and , the [[defencepervert]] is quite different from that of other "[[schooldefends]]s of himself in his [[psychoanalysisdesire,]]" since "desire is a defence (''défense''), which, if they have distinguished between a [[defenceprohibition]] and (''défense'') against going beyond a certain [[resistancelimit]] at all, have generally tended to regard in ''[[defencejouissance]]s as transitory phenomena and [[resistance]]s as more stable''.<ref>{{E}} p. 322</ref>
==More==In 1964 he goes on to argue:<blockquote>"To desire involves a defensive [[phase]] that makes it identical with not wanting to desire."<ref>{{S11}} p.235</ref></blockquote>
The opposition between ==See Also=={{See}}* [[desireEgo-psychology]] and * [[defenceFantasy]] is, for ||* [[LacanNeurosis]], a * [[dialecticPerversion]]al one.||* [[Repression]]* [[Resistance]]||* [[Structure]]* [[Subject]]||* [[Treatment]]* [[Unconscious]]{{Also}}
Thus he argues in 1960 that, like the [[neurotic]], the [[pervert]] "defends himself in his desire," since "desire is a defence (''''), a prohibition ('''') against going beyond a certain limit in ''jouissance''.<ref>{{E}} p.322</ref>
In 1964 he goes on to argue==References==<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small"><references/></div>
<blockquote>"To desire involves a defensive phase tht makes it identical with not wanting to desire."<ref>[[Category:Freudian psychology]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Practice]]{{S11OK}} p.235</ref></blockquote>
[[Category:Dictionary]]__NOTOC__
Anonymous user
Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/Special:MobileDiff/13992...45327"

Navigation menu