1
edit
Changes
Gaze
,typos
{{Top}}regard{{Bottom}}
===Object=Split==It is only in 1964And whereas [[Sartre]] had conceived of an essential reciprocity between seeing the [[Other]] and being-seen-by-him, with [[Lacan]] now conceives of an antinomic relation between the development of [[gaze]] and the concept of ''[[objet petit agaze|eye]]'' as : the [[causegaze|eye]] which looks is that of the [[desiresubject]], that while the [[Lacangaze]] devlops his own theory is on the side of the [[gazeobject]], a theory which and there is quite distinct no coincidence between the two, since "You never look at me from the [[Sartreplace]]'sat which I see you."<ref>{{S11}}p. 103</ref> Whereas [[Sartre]] had conflated When the [[gazesubject]] with the looks at an [[gaze|act of lookingobject]], [[Lacan]] now separates the two; the [[gazeobject]] becomes is always already gazing back at the [[objectsubject]] of , but from a point at which the [[gaze|act of lookingsubject]], or, to be more precise, the cannot see it. This [[objectsplit]] of between the [[drivegaze|scopic driveeye]]. The and the [[gaze]] is therefore, in [[Lacannothing]]'s account, no longer on the side of other than the [[subjectsplit|subjective division]]; it is itself, expressed in the [[gaze]] field of the [[Othervision]].
===The Gaze and The Eye=Film Theory==And whereas [[Sartre]] had conceived The concept of an essential reciprocity between seeing the [[Othergaze]] and being-seen-was taken up by-him, [[Lacanpsychoanalytic]] now conceives of an antinomic relation between the [[gazeart|film criticism]] and in the 1970s, especially by [[gaze|eyefeminist]]: the [[gazeart|eyefilm critics]] which looks is that . However, many of the these critics have conflated [[subjectLacan]], while 's concept of the [[gaze]] is on the side of with the [[objectSartre]], and there is no coincidence between the two, since "You never look at me from the place at which I see you."<ref>{{S11}} p. 103</ref> When an concept of the [[subjectgaze]] looks at an and other [[objectideas]], the on vision such as [[objectFoucault]] is always already gazing back at the 's account of [[subjectFoucault|panopticism]], but from point at which the [[subject]] cannot see it. This Much of so-called "[[splitLacan]] between the ian [[gazeart|eye]] and the [[gazefilm theory]] " is nothing other than thus the site of great [[split|subjective divisionconceptual]] itself, expressed in the field of visionconfusion.
{{See}}
* [[Desire]]
{{Also}}
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Terms]]
__NOTOC__