24,656
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{SSeminarsNavBar|RightPrevLink=Seminar IV|RightPrevText=Seminar IV|RightNextLink=Seminar VI|RightNextText=Seminar VI}}
{| stylealign="line-height:2.0em;width:100%;text-align:justify;border-spacing:8px;center"|style="width:100%600px;border:0px 1px solid #cccccc;background-color:#ffffffaaa;vertical-align:top"|{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:justifyleft;verticalline-alignheight:top2.0em;backgroundpadding-colorleft:#ffffff10px;"
|-
|style="width:100px;text-align:justifyleft; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"| 1957 - 1958| style="width:100px;colortext-align:#000left;line-height:2.5em0em; padding-left:10px;"| [[Seminar V]]| style="width:300px;text-align:justifyleft; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|''[[Seminar V|Les formations de l'inconscient]]''<BR><big>[[Seminar V|The Formations of the Unconscious]]</big>{{|} [[Image:Sem.V}}.jpg|border|300px|right]]The [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] are those circumstances in which the [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]] are most discernible: the [[joke]], the [[dream]], the [[symptom]], the [[lapsus]] ([[parapraxis]]). [[Freud]] referred to the fundamental mechanisms involved in the [[formation]]s of the [[unconscious]] as [[condensation]] and [[displacement]], which [[Lacan]] redefines as [[metaphor]] and [[metonymy]]. With the former, the play of [[signifier]]s creates [[sense]] in nonsense in relation to [[truth]]. The latter reveals the [[lack]] of a [[word]], "an item of waste sent like a ball between [[code]] and [[message]]." In this [[lack]] [[substitute]] [[word]]s appear and function like "the [[metonymic]] ruins of the [[object]]." At the junction between [[psychoanalysis]] and [[linguistics]], [[Lacan]] wants to [[formalize]] the primordial [[law]]s of the [[unconscious]] that [[Freud]] had uncovered. His [[project]] is to define a [[topology]] of the levels of functioning of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the [[graph]]s that, under the generic [[name]] of [[Graph of Desire]], will be at the core of "[[The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]]" written in 1960 and published in 1966 in <i>[[Écrits]]</i>. Here the key [[concept]] is that of [[desire]], and [[Lacan]]'s [[dialectic]] of [[desire]] is quite distinct from [[Hegel]]'s. The Graph of Desire will serve as a [[topology]] of the different steps constitutive of the [[subject]]. "It is precisely because desire is articulated that it is not articulable" in a [[signifying chain]]. [[Slavoj Zizek]] commenting on this formulation argues that [[subject]] is not substance, "it has not substantial positive [[being]] in itself, being caught between 'not yet' and 'no longer'. The [[subject]] never is, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here, since there is only a trace of its [[absence]]." The [[subject]] is dependent on the [[recognition]] of the [[Other]] who embodies "the legitimacy of the code," he alone can ratify a word as a [[joke]], as stupidity or as [[madness]]. With the [[Other]], [[Lacan]] moves on to the [[analysis]] of the [[Oedipus complex]]. [[Three]] [[stages]] [[structure]] the [[constitution]] of the [[subject]]. First, the [[paternal metaphor]] [[acts]] intrinsically on account of the primacy given to the [[phallus]] by [[culture]]. Then, the father intervenes as the one who deprives the [[mother]]: to her he addresses the [[message]] "You will not reintegrate your product" - the [[child]] as [[phallic]] [[object]]. The [[child]] receives "a [[message]] on the [[message]]," in the [[form]] of "You will not [[sleep]] with your mother" that liberates and deprives him of the object of his [[desire]]. From the alternative "To be or not to be the [[phallus]]," he can move to the alternative "To have it or not to have it." The [[third]] [[moment]] - the exit out of the [[Oedipus complex]] - requires the [[intervention]] of the permissive and generous father who, preferred over the [[mother]], gives [[birth]] to the [[idea]] of the [[ego]]. It is in this context that the problems of becoming boy or [[girl]] - of the inverted [[Oedipus complex]] are raised. [[Lacan]] plays with the term "[[insistence]]" in [[order]] to [[recall]] [[repetition]], the characteristic of the [[signifying chain]] in the [[unconscious]]. "The unconscious is neither primordial nor [[instinctual]]; what it [[knows]] [[about]] the elementary is but the elements of the signifier." In a previous [[writing]], "[[The Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since Freud]]," he defines the unconscious as a [[memory]] that can be compared to that of modern [[thinking]]-machines where the chain that insists on reproducing itself in the [[transference]] can be found, and which is the [[chain]] of [[dead]] [[desire]]. In "[[The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious]]," written in 1960, [[Lacan]] states that "it is not the law that bars the [[subject]]'s access to <i>[[jouissance]]</i> but [[pleasure]]." In 1966 he will add a final [[sentence]]: "[[Castration]] means that <i>[[jouissance]]</i> must be refused, so that it can be reached on the inverted ladder (<i>échelle inversée</i>) of the [[Law]] of [[desire]]."
"The formations [[signification]] of the unconscious are those circumstances in which the laws of the unconscious are most discerniblephallus" (<i>[[Écrits: the joke, the dream, the symptom, the lapsus (parapraxisA Selection]]</i>). Freud referred to is a lecture given at the fundamental mechanisms involved Max Planck Institute in the formations of the unconscious as condensation and displacement, which Lacan redefines as metaphor and metonymyMunich in 1958. With All the former, the play of signifiers creates sense in nonsense in research accomplished during <i>La relation to truth. The latter reveals the lack of a word, "an item of waste sent like a ball between code and message." In this lack substitute words appear and function like "the metonymic ruins of the object."d'[[objet]]<br/i>At the junction between psychoanalysis and linguistics, Lacan wants to formalize the primordial laws of the unconscious that Freud had uncovered. His project is to define a topology of the levels of functioning of the signifier in the subject by elaborating the graphs that, under the generic name of Graph of Desire, will be at the core of "The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious" written in 1960 and published in 1966 in <i>ÉcritsLes [[formations]] de l'[[inconscient]]</i>. Here the key concept is that of desireculminates here, and Lacan's dialectic of desire is quite distinct from Hegel's. The Graph of Desire will serve serves as a topology of the different steps constitutive of the subjectan introduction to <i>Le [[désir]] et son [[interpretation]]. "It is precisely because desire is articulated that it is not articulable" in a signifying chain. Slavoj Zizek commenting on this formulation argues that subject is not substance, "it has not substantial positive being in itself, being caught between 'not yet' and 'no longer'. The subject never is, it will have been - either it is not yet here or it is no longer here, since there is only a trace of its absence."</i><br>
The subject is dependent on alternative seems ineluctable: either the recognition of [[Mother]] or the Other who embodies "the legitimacy of the code," he alone can ratify a word as a joke, as stupidity or as madness[[Father]]. With To choose the Other, Lacan moves on [[Mother]] means to be condemned to the analysis dependency of [[demand]], while the Oedipus complex. Three stages structure [[Father]] constitutes the constitution of the subject. Firstaccess to [[desire]], the paternal metaphor acts intrinsically on account of the primacy given hence to the phallus by culturesalvation. Then, If the father intervenes as the one who deprives the mother: [[Father]] must be preferred to her he addresses the message "You will not reintegrate your product" - [[Mother]], if the child as phallic object. The child receives "a message on [[Father]] is the message," in origin and the form [[representative]] of "You will not sleep with your mother" that liberates [[culture]] (and deprives him of the object of his desire. From the alternative "To be or not to be [[Law]]), it is because he possesses the [[phallus," ]] that he can move to the alternative "To have it give or not to have itrefuse." The third moment absolute primacy of the [[phallus]] - the exit out single emblem of the Oedipus complex Man - requires has become a [[real]] doctrinal (perhaps dogmatic) basis of [[Lacanian]] [[theory]]: "The [[phallus]] is the intervention [[signifier]] of the permissive and generous father who[[signifier]]s, preferred over the mother, gives birth to privileged signifier of that mark in which the idea [[role]] of the ego. It [[logos]] is joined with the advent of [[desire]]," its function "touches on its most profound rapport: that in this context that which the problems of becoming boy or girl - of Ancients embodied the inverted Oedipus complex are raised.<bri>Nous</i>Lacan plays with , the [[Mind]], and the term <i>Logos</i>, [[discourse]], [[reason]]."insistenceWhy such a privilege? " This [[signifier]] is chosen as the most tangible element in order to recall repetition, the characteristic real of [[sexual]] copulation; it is the signifying chain most [[symbolic]] in the unconscious. literal sense," since "The unconscious is neither primordial nor instinctual; what it knows about the elementary is but the elements of equivalent to the signifier[[logical]] copula." In a previous writing Moreover, "The Agency by virtue of the Letter in the Unconscious or Reason since Freudits turgidity," he defines it epitomizes the unconscious as a memory that can be compared to that [[image]] of modern thinking-machines where the chain that insists on reproducing itself vital flow as it is transmitted in the transference can be foundgeneration." [[Freud]] says, and which there is the chain of dead desire.<br>In "The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconsciousonly one [[libido]]," written [[masculine]] in 1960[[nature]]. Later, [[Lacan states ]] will assert that "it [[there is not the law that bars the subject's access to no such thing as sexual rapport]]," <i>jouissance</i> but pleasure." In 1966 he will add [[il n'y a final sentence: "Castration means that <i>jouissancepas de rapport sexuel]]</i> must be refused, so that it can be reached on in the inverted ladder (<i>échelle inversée</i>) sense of proportion or relation: one sex counts for both [[sexes]]. Thus the Law of desire[[phallus]] can only appear as veiled."
==French==
{| class="toccolours floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px; clear: right; margin: 0 0 0.5em 1em;"
|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1em;" |
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| colspan="3" style="background: #CCCCCC;" align="center" |'''Download''' [https://mega.nz/#F!bW4QxCyT!fsfKX3uBscmVA7jzO34QAQ ALL]
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
|
{| width="100%" style="valign:top" valign="top"
|
* [https://mega.nz/#!rP4H0KqL!9ak-tFmhyuPR9s_VbsMKKnatjutEDl9Mv_EU0bouSh0 1957.11.06]
* [https://mega.nz/#!qaxzHIIR!DeNLRUgC3Owzf9NPeREXWjauQdZq5cuA4Yg4YaEVDB0 1957.11.13]
* [https://mega.nz/#!nOh1HaST!1x_EhuNh8qVy6sNAGAqyHNbvTDLHCUL2PeybVskDH50 1957.11.20]
* [https://mega.nz/#!DWpVWYSJ!1RL2kOEwSCx2RuYHuesBDBoO6UFqz1sVemT0tiELEs0 1957.11.27]
* [https://mega.nz/#!PewRGa5a!nCZVK2NCIHFRCCyyx90zvB1ntWusiAawY6Jskr5erL4 1957.12.04]
* [https://mega.nz/#!TTxXjaJD!O8Y6JxMSkC67U29e644QNKD14IuhyabLGItualXsj6Q 1957.12.11]
||
* [https://mega.nz/#!OGoliC5C!wHQeFcIXDdUkoR8rb7DMa-4-via0F_3aRvaVqXXW9XY 1957.12.18]
* [https://mega.nz/#!iWxVWKpY!YG7h8zN_XVbpVMkSe4C1HCGQy4wTf8zkuqWpUPoo3T8 1958.01.08]
* [https://mega.nz/#!eHplwaBY!5Mo38u1g-7uWJ0yRJvd40KQyokKUIzT6iZJH3SN0Vcc 1958.01.15]
* [https://mega.nz/#!uXo1AA6a!bNKj9oIev1I1Qt5seIs1MVIEzmh7WCygBMvSZmnSbZY 1958.01.22]
* [https://mega.nz/#!rGhVzCgJ!ewMgHhihOcglkYs_8-5TOPverhDluS63P-Ya_JrCj_k 1958.01.29]
* [https://mega.nz/#!DHxXgahA!TNiS9696jsCFJued9bP7F_u1N9cfJImcWnkky94FdY4 1958.02.05]
||
* [https://mega.nz/#!je4BxC4I!wIHUmJ_2XtRtQMLsT6NsxukuULWIWfm-XrrNxqVKjXg 1958.02.12]
* [https://mega.nz/#!yKoxwa4a!pI_9ACzn8ULL0mWZT_rccxMyU0Iu4IKzkaCmlKutRu0 1958.03.05]
* [https://mega.nz/#!WSwlgKBa!sriBkzXcgf0WEvWcfe0JyzA8ELSafkadmhviM9JuCws 1958.03.12]
* [https://mega.nz/#!3DpnlAoC!McI5jdeemozModSudZ2XrxIT361PVrDJMu1w4_fzopE 1958.03.19]
* [https://mega.nz/#!LH5TxI7I!Vl5gF3m5n9EmS-c1mz4_SKdTT4l85R3oh9hc4Rn5fKU 1958.03.26]
* [https://mega.nz/#!mWhFhSTZ!uR7VcyNl_FnhesiiGYlqhBCBtiMXDTIecDQXJsSBJ_4 1958.04.09]
||
* [https://mega.nz/#!DehnAaxK!91OdtBaeBc2aW566bWTMW7OCmfjudyqZihx7cfeARYc 1958.04.16]
* [https://mega.nz/#!TegnAIbA!YvAae-tPKpbO53NMmxrEU-TtXmnW3U_SNJnhG_XznM0 1958.04.23]
* [https://mega.nz/#!eG51DK7Z!Q02-fuuRWNRmG0BLL0pOI0-6CBAoKeVNnwl90T5e9zg 1958.05.07]
* [https://mega.nz/#!2PpxCATR!Xnjmp2bCuxZ6duJzVUMPXBsUVXaTpNWckkZ8GNuNSXY 1958.05.14]
* [https://mega.nz/#!KP5H2CyA!EbuKA3ATnXNvoqKDLGrQJEHrnfJUEDwyiTnVNfJ8l88 1958.05.21]
* [https://mega.nz/#!HWgFRIKQ!GvELfjTBf94kyYjbbqCktBppIyx-3ofGURmFYunskbU 1958.06.04]
||
* [https://mega.nz/#!PeplxSyI!IVJzaYujjdcLyEVwxyXQO1RT5f3hArOHszHWRwf4Mlg 1958.06.11]
* [https://mega.nz/#!eb4jEKbT!WowRSo4dahMuPUul2lFFhq6dyEuj7N9Zr5yQ_j6RFpA 1958.06.18]
* [https://mega.nz/#!yDoFnKYZ!HuUrVsRTzobt1dJlns2EdOBdALKLjGeG23gHM1wtdHw 1958.06.25]
* [https://mega.nz/#!Hag1ySBT!TP0JMuS_qN3vTSqki9oKEkVxCVYIY4GkuR6QUshhx9M 1958.07.02]
* [https://mega.nz/#F!bW4QxCyT!fsfKX3uBscmVA7jzO34QAQ Download all]
|}
|}
French versions of [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[Seminars]] Source: http://ecole-lacanienne.net
* [[:File:Seminaire_05.pdf|Download]]
<BR><pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_05.pdf</pdf>
<!--
1957-1958
<b>Le séminaire, Livre V: Les formations de [[l'inconscient]].</b><br>[[French]]: (texte établi par Jacques-[[Alain ]] [[Miller]]), [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1998.<br>[[English]]: unpublished.
{| style="width:100%; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
|width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book II : The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955 (Seminar of Jacques Lacan)]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Trans. [[Sylvana Tomaselli]]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991. Paperback, [[Language]]: English, ISBN: 0393307093. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393307093/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small>
|}
<BR>
|width="100%"| [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. [[Seminar I|Le séminaire, Livre II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse]]. Ed. [[Jacques-Alain Miller]]. Paris: Seuil, 1977. 374 pages, Language: French, ISBN: 2020047276. <small><small>Buy it at [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubject-20/ Amazon.com], [http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub07-20/ Amazon.ca], [http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub-21/ Amazon.de], [http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosubjencyofl-21/ Amazon.co.uk] or [http://www.amazon.fr/exec/obidos/ASIN/2020047276/nosub04-21/ Amazon.fr].</small></small>
|}