Changes
Absence
,The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
{{Top}}[[absent]]|absence{{Bottom}}
==Symbolic==
The [[symbolic order]] is characterized by a binary opposition between [[absence]] and [[absence|presence]].<ref>{{S4}} p.67-8</ref>
<blockquote>"In [[the symbolic]] [[order]] nothing [[exists]] except upon an assumed foundation of absence. Nothing exists except insofar as it does not [[exist]]."<ref>{{Ec}} p.392</ref></blockquote>
==Real==
This is a basic [[difference]] between the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].
<blockquote>"There is no absence in [[The Real|the real]]. There is only absence if you [[suggest]] that there may be a presence there where there isn't one."<ref>{{S2}} p.313</ref></blockquote>
== The Symbolic Order Linguistics==According to As [[Jacques LacanRoman Jakobson]]showed with his [[analysis]] of [[phoneme]]s,all [[linguistic]] phenomena may be entirely characterized in [[terms]] of the [[absence|presence]] or [[absence]] of certain distinctive features.
==Fort/Da==
[[Lacan]] sees the [[game]] of ''[[fort-da|fort!/da!]]'', which [[Freud]] describes in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'', as a [[primitive]] phonemic opposition representing the child's entry into the [[symbolic order]]. The two sounds made by the [[development|child]], O/A, are "a pair of sounds modulated on presence and absence, and these sounds are related "to the presence and absence of persons and things."<ref>{{E}} p.65, 109, n.46</ref>
[[Lacan]] [[notes]] that the [[word]] is "a [[absence|presence]] made of [[absence]]" because:
# the [[symbol]] is used in the [[absence]] of the [[thing]] and
# [[signifiers]] only exist insofar as they are opposed to [[other]] [[signifiers]].<ref>{{E}} p.65</ref>
<!-- There is [[loss]] in the word. [[Language]] can operate only by designating an [[object]] in its ''[[absence]]''. [[Lacan]] argues that [[symbolization]] turns on the [[object]] as ''[[absence]]''. -->
==Presence==
Because of the mutual implication of [[absence]] and [[absence|presence]] in the [[symbolic order]], [[absence]] can be said to have an equally positive [[existence]] in the [[symbolic]] as [[absence|presence]]. This is what allows [[Lacan]] to say that "the nothing" (''le rien'') is in itself an [[object]] (a [[partial object]]).<ref>{{S4}} p.184-5</ref>
==See Also==
{{See}}* [[Existence]]* [[Fort-Da]]||* [[Linguistics]]* [[Object]]||* [[symbolicPhallus]]* [[presenceSexual difference]]||* [[objectSignifier]]* [[fort-daSymbol]]||* [[Symbolic]]* [[childReal]]{{Also}}
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
[[Ecrits]] is the essential source for anyone who seeks to [[understand]] this seminal thinker and hisinfluence influence on contemporary [[thought]] and [[culture]].
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:PsychoanalysisLanguage]][[Category:Linguistics]] __NOTOC__