Difference between revisions of "Acting out"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The term "[[acting out]]" is used in the ''[[Standard Edition]]'' to translate the [[German]] word ''[[Agieren]]'' used by [[Freud]].
 
The term "[[acting out]]" is used in the ''[[Standard Edition]]'' to translate the [[German]] word ''[[Agieren]]'' used by [[Freud]].
  
In [[Freud]]'s [[{{LB}}|work]], "'''[[repetition|repeating]]'''" and "'''[[memory|remembering]]'''" are "contrasting ways of bringing the ''past'' into the ''present''."<ref>Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. ''The Language of Psycho-Analysis''. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4</ref>
+
In [[Freud]]'s [[{{LB}}|work]], "'''[[repetition|repeating]]'''" and "'''[[memory|remembering]]'''" are "contrasting ways of bringing the ''past'' into the ''present''."<ref>Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. ''The Language of Psycho-Analysis''. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4</ref> If ''past'' events are '''[[repression|repressed]]''' from '''[[memory]]''', they '''[[return]]''' in the ''present'' by expressing themselves in '''actions'''; when the '''[[subject]]''' does not '''[[remember]]''' the ''past'', therefore, he is condemned to '''[[repetition|repeat]]''' it by [[acting out|acting it out]]. Conversely, [[psychoanalytic treatment]] aims to break the cycle of [[repetition]] by helping the [[analysand|patient]] to [[remember]].
  
If ''past'' events are '''[[repression|repressed]]''' from '''[[memory]]''', they '''[[return]]''' in the ''present'' by expressing themselves in '''actions'''; when the '''[[subject]]''' does not '''[[remember]]''' the ''past'', therefore, he is condemned to '''[[repetition|repeat]]''' it by [[acting out|acting it out]].
+
Although an element of [[repetition]] can be found in almost every [[human]] [[action]], the term "[[acting out]]" is usually reserved for those [[action]]s which display "an impulsive aspect relatively out of harmony with the subject's usual motivational patterns" and which are therefore "fairly easy to isolate from the overall trends of his activity."<ref>Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. ''The Language of Psycho-Analysis''. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4</ref> The [[subject]] fails to understand his motives for the [[action]].
  
Conversely, [[psychoanalytic treatment]] aims to break the cycle of ''''[[repetition]]''' by helping the [[analysand|patient]] to '''[[remember]]'''.
+
From a [[Lacan]]ian perspective, this basic definition of "[[acting out]]" is true but incomplete; it ignores the dimension of the [[Other]]. Thus while [[Lacan]] maintains that [[acting out]] results from a failure to [[recollect]] the ''past'', he emphasizes the [[intersubjective]] dimension of [[recollection]]. In other words, [[recollection]] does not merely involve recalling something to [[consciousness]], but also [[communication|communicating]] this to an [[Other]] by means of [[speech]]. Hence [[acting out]] results when [[recollection]] is made impossible by the refusal of the [[Other]] to listen.
  
==Motivation==
+
When the [[Other]] has become "deaf," the [[subject]] cannot convey a [[message]] to him in words, and is forced to expressed the [[message]] in [[action]]s. The [[acting out]] is thus a ciphered [[message]] which the [[subject]] addresses to an [[Other]], although the [[subject]] himself is neither [[conscious]] of the content of this [[message]] nor even aware that his [[action]]s express a [[message]]. It is the [[Other]] who is entrusted with deciphering the [[message]]; yet it is impossible for him to do so.
Although an element of [[repetition]] can be found in almost every [[human]] [[action]], the term "[[acting out]]" is usually reserved for those [[action]]s which display "an impulsive aspect relatively out of harmony with the subject's usual motivational patterns" and which are therefore "fairly easy to isolate from the overall trends of his activity."<ref>Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. ''The Language of Psycho-Analysis''. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4</ref>
 
  
The [[subject]] fails to understand his motives for the [[action]].
+
=====See Also=====
 
 
==Jacques Lacan==
 
[[Lacan]], following a tradition in psychoanalytic writing, uses this term in [[English]].
 
 
 
From a [[Lacan]]ian perspective, this basic definition of "[[acting out]]" is true but incomplete; it ignores the dimension of the [[Other]].
 
 
 
==Recollection==
 
Thus while [[Lacan]] maintains that [[acting out]] results from a failure to [[recollect]] the past, he emphasizes the [[intersubjective]] dimension of [[recollection]].
 
 
 
In other words, [[recollection]] does not merely involve recalling something to [[consciousness]], but also [[communicating]] this to an [[Other]] by means of [[speech]].
 
 
 
Hence [[acting out]] results when [[recollection]] is made impossible by the refusal of the [[Other]] to listen.
 
 
 
==Communication==
 
When the [[Other]] has become "deaf," the [[subject]] cannot convey a [[message]] to him in words, and is forced to expressed the [[message]] in [[action]]s.
 
 
 
The [[acting out]] is thus a ciphered [[message]] which the [[subject]] addresses to an [[Other]], although the [[subject]] himself is neither [[conscious]] of the content of this [[message]] nor even aware that his [[action]]s express a [[message]].
 
 
 
It is the [[Other]] who is entrusted with deciphering the [[message]]; yet it is impossible for him to do so.
 
 
 
==See Also==
 
 
{{See}}
 
{{See}}
 
* [[Act]]
 
* [[Act]]
Line 50: Line 28:
 
{{Also}}
 
{{Also}}
  
== References ==
+
=====References=====
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
+
{{OK}}
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
 
[[Category:Practice]]
 
[[Category:Practice]]
 
[[Category:Treatment]]
 
[[Category:Treatment]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
{{OK}}
 
  
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 21:43, 11 September 2006

The term "acting out" is used in the Standard Edition to translate the German word Agieren used by Freud.

In Freud's work, "repeating" and "remembering" are "contrasting ways of bringing the past into the present."[1] If past events are repressed from memory, they return in the present by expressing themselves in actions; when the subject does not remember the past, therefore, he is condemned to repeat it by acting it out. Conversely, psychoanalytic treatment aims to break the cycle of repetition by helping the patient to remember.

Although an element of repetition can be found in almost every human action, the term "acting out" is usually reserved for those actions which display "an impulsive aspect relatively out of harmony with the subject's usual motivational patterns" and which are therefore "fairly easy to isolate from the overall trends of his activity."[2] The subject fails to understand his motives for the action.

From a Lacanian perspective, this basic definition of "acting out" is true but incomplete; it ignores the dimension of the Other. Thus while Lacan maintains that acting out results from a failure to recollect the past, he emphasizes the intersubjective dimension of recollection. In other words, recollection does not merely involve recalling something to consciousness, but also communicating this to an Other by means of speech. Hence acting out results when recollection is made impossible by the refusal of the Other to listen.

When the Other has become "deaf," the subject cannot convey a message to him in words, and is forced to expressed the message in actions. The acting out is thus a ciphered message which the subject addresses to an Other, although the subject himself is neither conscious of the content of this message nor even aware that his actions express a message. It is the Other who is entrusted with deciphering the message; yet it is impossible for him to do so.

See Also
References
  1. Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4
  2. Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Betrand. The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 1967. p.4