Difference between revisions of "Aggressivity"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(agressivité)
+
{{Topp}}agressivité{{Bottom}}
  
Aggressivity is one of the central issues that Lacan deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.  
+
==Jacques Lacan==
The first point that should be noted is that Lacan draws a distinction between aggressivity and aggression, in that the latter refers only to [[violence|violent]] [[act]]s whereas the former is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such acts but many other phenomena also.<ref>see Sl, 177</ref>
+
[[Aggressivity]] is one of the central issues that [[Lacan]] deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.  
Thus aggressivity is just as present, Lacan argues, in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it "underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.<ref>E, 7</ref>
+
 
In taking this stance, Lacan is simply restating [[Freud]]'s concept of [[ambivalence]] (the interdependence of [[love]] and [[hate]]), which Lacan regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of [[psychoanalysis]].
+
==Ambivalence==
Lacan situates aggressivity in the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]].
+
[[Lacan]] draws a [[distinction]] between [[aggressivity]] and [[aggressivity|aggression]]: [[aggressivity|aggression]] refers only to [[violence|violent]] [[act]]s whereas [[aggressivity]] is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such [[acts]] but many [[other]] phenomena also.<ref>{{S1}} p. 177</ref> [[Lacan]] argues that [[aggressivity]] is just as [[present]] in apparently [[love|loving]] [[act]]s as in violent ones; it "underlies the [[activity]] of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.<ref>{{E}} p. 7</ref> [[Lacan]] is simply restating [[Freud]]'s [[concept]] of [[ambivalence]] -- the interdependence of [[love]] and [[hate]], which [[Lacan]] regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of [[psychoanalysis]].
In the [[mirror stage]], the [[infant]] sees its reflection in the mirror as a wholeness, in contrast with the uncoordination in the [[real]] [[body]]: this contrast is experienced as an aggressive tension between the [[specular image]] and the real body, since the wholeness of the [[image]] seems to threaten the body with disintegration and fragmentation (see [[fragmented body]]).
+
 
The consequent [[identification]] with the specular image thus implies an ambivalent relation with the counterpart, involving both [[eroticism]] and aggression.  
+
==Dual Relation==
This 'erotic aggression' continues as a fundamental ambivalence underlying all future forms of identification, and is an essential characteristic of [[narcissism]].  
+
[[Lacan]] situates [[aggressivity]] in the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]]. In the [[mirror stage]], the [[infant]] sees its [[reflection]] in the [[mirror]] as a [[wholeness]], in contrast with the uncoordination in the [[real]] [[body]]: this contrast is experienced as an [[aggressivity|aggressive tension]] between the [[specular image]] and the [[real]] [[body]], since the [[wholeness]] of the [[image]] seems to threaten the [[body]] with [[fragmented body|disintegration]] and [[fragmentation]].
Narcissism can thus easily veer from extreme self-love to the opposite extreme of 'narcissistic suicidal aggression' (''agression suicidaire narcissique'').<ref>Ec, 187</ref>
+
 
By linking aggressivity to the [[imaginary]] [[order]] of [[eros]], Lacan seems to diverge significantly from Freud, since Freud sees aggressivity as an outward manifestation of the [[death drive]] (which is, in Lacanian terms, situated not in the imaginary but in the symbolic order). Aggressivity is also related by Lacan to the [[Hegel]]ian concept of the [[fight to the death]], which is a stage in the [[dialectic]] of the [[master]] and the [[slave]].
+
==Narcissism==
Lacan argues that it is important to bring the [[analysand]]'s aggressivity into play early in the treatment by causing it to emerge as negative [[transference]].
+
The consequent [[identification]] with the [[specular image]] thus implies an [[ambivalence|ambivalent]] relation with the [[counterpart]], involving both [[eroticism]] and [[aggressivity|aggression]]. This "[[aggressivity|erotic aggression]]" continues as a fundamental [[ambivalence]] underlying all [[future]] forms of [[identification]], and is an essential characteristic of [[narcissism]]. [[Narcissism]] can thus easily veer from extreme [[love|self-love]] to the opposite extreme of "[[narcissism|narcissistic suicidal aggression]]" (''[[agression]] suicidaire narcissique'').<ref>{{Ec}} p. 187</ref>
This aggressivity directed towards the [[analyst]] then becomes "the initial knot of the analytic drama."<ref>E, 14</ref>
+
 
This phase of the [[treatment]] is very important since if the aggressivity is handled correctly by the analyst, it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the patient's deepest resistances.<ref>Lacan, 1951b: 13</ref>
+
==Imaginary==
 +
By linking [[aggressivity]] to the [[imaginary]] [[order]] of [[eros]], [[Lacan]] seems to diverge significantly from [[Freud]], since [[Freud]] sees [[aggressivity]] as an outward manifestation of the [[death drive]] (which is, in [[Lacan]]ian [[terms]], situated not in the [[imaginary]] but in the [[symbolic]] [[order]]). [[Aggressivity]] is also related by [[Lacan]] to the [[Hegel]]ian concept of the [[fight to the death]], which is a [[stage]] in the [[dialectic]] of the [[master]] and the [[slave]].
 +
 
 +
==Treatment==
 +
[[Lacan]] argues that it is important to bring the [[analysand]]'s [[aggressivity]] into play early in the [[treatment]] by causing it to emerge as [[negative]] [[transference]]. This [[aggressivity]] directed towards the [[analyst]] then becomes "the initial [[knot]] of the [[analytic]] drama."<ref>{{E}} p.14</ref> This [[phase]] of the [[treatment]] is very important since if the [[aggressivity]] is handled correctly by the [[analyst]], it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the [[patient]]'s deepest [[resistances]].<ref>{{L}} "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|Some Reflections on the Ego]]", ''Int. J. [[Psycho]]-[[Anal]]''., vol. 34, 1953: p. 13</ref>
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [[Analysand]]
 +
* [[Analyst]]
 +
* [[Counterpart]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Death drive]]
 +
* [[Dialectic]]
 +
* [[Fragmented body]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Imaginary]]
 +
* [[Identification]]
 +
* [[Master]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Mirror stage]]
 +
* [[Narcissism]]
 +
* [[Psychoanalysis]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Specular image]]
 +
* [[Transference]]
 +
* [[Treatment]]
 +
{{Also}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 +
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
</div>
  
== References ==
+
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
<references/>
+
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
 
 
[[Category:Imaginary]]
 
[[Category:Imaginary]]
[[Category:Lacan]]
+
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
+
{{OK}}
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
+
 
 +
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 01:10, 24 May 2019

French: agressivité

Jacques Lacan

Aggressivity is one of the central issues that Lacan deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.

Ambivalence

Lacan draws a distinction between aggressivity and aggression: aggression refers only to violent acts whereas aggressivity is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such acts but many other phenomena also.[1] Lacan argues that aggressivity is just as present in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it "underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.[2] Lacan is simply restating Freud's concept of ambivalence -- the interdependence of love and hate, which Lacan regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of psychoanalysis.

Dual Relation

Lacan situates aggressivity in the dual relation between the ego and the counterpart. In the mirror stage, the infant sees its reflection in the mirror as a wholeness, in contrast with the uncoordination in the real body: this contrast is experienced as an aggressive tension between the specular image and the real body, since the wholeness of the image seems to threaten the body with disintegration and fragmentation.

Narcissism

The consequent identification with the specular image thus implies an ambivalent relation with the counterpart, involving both eroticism and aggression. This "erotic aggression" continues as a fundamental ambivalence underlying all future forms of identification, and is an essential characteristic of narcissism. Narcissism can thus easily veer from extreme self-love to the opposite extreme of "narcissistic suicidal aggression" (agression suicidaire narcissique).[3]

Imaginary

By linking aggressivity to the imaginary order of eros, Lacan seems to diverge significantly from Freud, since Freud sees aggressivity as an outward manifestation of the death drive (which is, in Lacanian terms, situated not in the imaginary but in the symbolic order). Aggressivity is also related by Lacan to the Hegelian concept of the fight to the death, which is a stage in the dialectic of the master and the slave.

Treatment

Lacan argues that it is important to bring the analysand's aggressivity into play early in the treatment by causing it to emerge as negative transference. This aggressivity directed towards the analyst then becomes "the initial knot of the analytic drama."[4] This phase of the treatment is very important since if the aggressivity is handled correctly by the analyst, it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the patient's deepest resistances.[5]

See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book I. Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953-54. Trans. John Forrester. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 177
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 7
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 187
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.14
  5. Lacan, Jacques. "Some Reflections on the Ego", Int. J. Psycho-Anal., vol. 34, 1953: p. 13