Difference between revisions of "Aggressivity"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
  
  
 +
[[Aggressivity]] (French:''agressivité'') is one of the central issues that [[Lacan]] deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.
  
[[Aggressivity]] (French:''agressivité'') is one of the central issues that Lacan deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.  
+
[[Lacan]] draws a distinction between [[aggressivity ]]and [[aggression]].
  
 +
==Aggression==
 +
[[Aggression]] refers only to [[violence|violent]] [[act]]s whereas [[aggressivity]] is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such acts but many other phenomena also.<ref>{{Sl}} p.177</ref>
  
Lacan draws a distinction between aggressivity and aggression.
+
[[Lacan]] argues that [[aggressivity]] is just as present in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it "underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.<ref>{{E}} p.7</ref>
  
 +
[[Lacan]] is simply restating [[Freud]]'s concept of [[ambivalence]] (the interdependence of [[love]] and [[hate]]), which [[Lacan]] regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of [[psychoanalysis]].
  
[[Aggression]] refers only to [[violence|violent]] [[act]]s whereas [[aggressivity]] is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such acts but many other phenomena also.<ref>see Sl, 177</ref>
+
[[Lacan]] situates [[aggressivity]] in the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]].
 +
In the [[mirror stage]], the [[infant]] sees its [[reflection]] in the [[mirror]] as a [[wholeness]], in contrast with the uncoordination in the [[real]] [[body]]: this contrast is experienced as an aggressive tension between the [[specular image]] and the [[real]] [[body]], since the [[wholeness]] of the [[image]] seems to threaten the [[body]] with disintegration and [[fragmentation]] (see [[fragmented body]]).
  
Lacan argues that [[aggressivity]] is just as present in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it "underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.<ref>E, 7</ref>
+
The consequent [[identification]] with the [[specular image]] thus implies an [[ambivalent]] relation with the [[counterpart]], involving both [[eroticism]] and aggression.  
  
In taking this stance, Lacan is simply restating [[Freud]]'s concept of [[ambivalence]] (the interdependence of [[love]] and [[hate]]), which Lacan regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of [[psychoanalysis]].
+
This 'erotic aggression' continues as a fundamental [[ambivalence]] underlying all future forms of [[identification]], and is an essential characteristic of [[narcissism]].
 +
 +
[[Narcissism]] can thus easily veer from extreme [[self-love]] to the opposite extreme of 'narcissistic suicidal aggression' (''agression suicidaire narcissique'').<ref>{{Ec}} p.187</ref>
  
Lacan situates aggressivity in the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]].
+
By linking [[aggressivity]] to the [[imaginary]] [[order]] of [[eros]], [[Lacan]] seems to diverge significantly from [[Freud]], since [[Freud]] sees [[aggressivity]] as an outward manifestation of the [[death drive]] (which is, in [[Lacan]]ian terms, situated not in the imaginary but in the symbolic order).  
In the [[mirror stage]], the [[infant]] sees its reflection in the mirror as a wholeness, in contrast with the uncoordination in the [[real]] [[body]]: this contrast is experienced as an aggressive tension between the [[specular image]] and the real body, since the wholeness of the [[image]] seems to threaten the body with disintegration and fragmentation (see [[fragmented body]]).
+
 
The consequent [[identification]] with the specular image thus implies an ambivalent relation with the counterpart, involving both [[eroticism]] and aggression.
+
[[Aggressivity]] is also related by [[Lacan]] to the [[Hegel]]ian concept of the [[fight to the death]], which is a [[stage]] in the [[dialectic]] of the [[master]] and the [[slave]].
This 'erotic aggression' continues as a fundamental ambivalence underlying all future forms of identification, and is an essential characteristic of [[narcissism]].
+
 
Narcissism can thus easily veer from extreme self-love to the opposite extreme of 'narcissistic suicidal aggression' (''agression suicidaire narcissique'').<ref>Ec, 187</ref>
+
[[Lacan]] argues that it is important to bring the [[analysand]]'s [[aggressivity]] into play early in the [[treatment]] by causing it to emerge as negative [[transference]].
By linking aggressivity to the [[imaginary]] [[order]] of [[eros]], Lacan seems to diverge significantly from Freud, since Freud sees aggressivity as an outward manifestation of the [[death drive]] (which is, in Lacanian terms, situated not in the imaginary but in the symbolic order). Aggressivity is also related by Lacan to the [[Hegel]]ian concept of the [[fight to the death]], which is a stage in the [[dialectic]] of the [[master]] and the [[slave]].
+
 
Lacan argues that it is important to bring the [[analysand]]'s aggressivity into play early in the treatment by causing it to emerge as negative [[transference]].
+
This [[aggressivity]] directed towards the [[analyst]] then becomes "the initial knot of the analytic drama."<ref>{{E}} 14</ref>
This aggressivity directed towards the [[analyst]] then becomes "the initial knot of the analytic drama."<ref>E, 14</ref>
+
 
This phase of the [[treatment]] is very important since if the aggressivity is handled correctly by the analyst, it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the patient's deepest resistances.<ref>Lacan, 1951b: 13</ref>
+
This [[phase]] of the [[treatment]] is very important since if the [[aggressivity]] is handled correctly by the [[analyst]], it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the patient's deepest resistances.<ref>Lacan, 1951b: 13</ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 30: Line 40:
  
 
[[Category:Imaginary]]
 
[[Category:Imaginary]]
[[Category:Lacan]]
+
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]

Revision as of 15:33, 21 June 2006


Aggressivity (French:agressivité) is one of the central issues that Lacan deals with in his papers in the period 1936 to the early 1950s.

Lacan draws a distinction between aggressivity and aggression.

Aggression

Aggression refers only to violent acts whereas aggressivity is a fundamental relation which underlies not only such acts but many other phenomena also.[1]

Lacan argues that aggressivity is just as present in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it "underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer.[2]

Lacan is simply restating Freud's concept of ambivalence (the interdependence of love and hate), which Lacan regards as one of the fundamental discoveries of psychoanalysis.

Lacan situates aggressivity in the dual relation between the ego and the counterpart. In the mirror stage, the infant sees its reflection in the mirror as a wholeness, in contrast with the uncoordination in the real body: this contrast is experienced as an aggressive tension between the specular image and the real body, since the wholeness of the image seems to threaten the body with disintegration and fragmentation (see fragmented body).

The consequent identification with the specular image thus implies an ambivalent relation with the counterpart, involving both eroticism and aggression.

This 'erotic aggression' continues as a fundamental ambivalence underlying all future forms of identification, and is an essential characteristic of narcissism.

Narcissism can thus easily veer from extreme self-love to the opposite extreme of 'narcissistic suicidal aggression' (agression suicidaire narcissique).[3]

By linking aggressivity to the imaginary order of eros, Lacan seems to diverge significantly from Freud, since Freud sees aggressivity as an outward manifestation of the death drive (which is, in Lacanian terms, situated not in the imaginary but in the symbolic order).

Aggressivity is also related by Lacan to the Hegelian concept of the fight to the death, which is a stage in the dialectic of the master and the slave.

Lacan argues that it is important to bring the analysand's aggressivity into play early in the treatment by causing it to emerge as negative transference.

This aggressivity directed towards the analyst then becomes "the initial knot of the analytic drama."[4]

This phase of the treatment is very important since if the aggressivity is handled correctly by the analyst, it will be accompanied by "a marked decrease in the patient's deepest resistances.[5]


See Also

References

  1. Template:Sl p.177
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.7
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.187
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. 14
  5. Lacan, 1951b: 13

PAGE 24 HOMER