Difference between revisions of "Algebra"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
algebra (algËbre)                 Algebra is a branch of MATHEMATICS Which reduces the
+
[[Algebra]] (''algèbre'') is a branch of [[mathematics]] which reduces the solution of problems to manipulations of symbolic expressions. Lacan begins to use algebraic symbols in his work in 1955 (see [[schema L]]), in an attempt to formalise psychoanalysis. Three main reasons lie behind this attempt at formalisation:
  
    solution of problems to manipulations of symbolic expressions. Lacan begins
+
1. Formalisation is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status (see [[science]]). Just as [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] uses quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to do the same for psychoanalysis.
  
    to use algebraic symbols in his work in 1955 (see scHEMA L), in an attempt to
+
2. Formalisation can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have      never experienced psychoanalytic treatment. The formulae thus become an essential aspect of the training of psychoanalysts which take their place alongside the training analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.
  
    formalise psychoanalysis. Three main        reasons lie behind this attempt at
+
3. Formalisation of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards as an imaginary lure which hinders access to the symbolic. Rather than being understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.<ref>see E, 313</ref>
  
    formalisation:
+
Most English translations of Lacan also translate the algebraic symbols which appear in his work. For example, Alan Sheridan, in his translation of Ecrits, renders the symbol A (for Autre) as O (for Other). However, Lacan was opposed to such a practice, as Sheridan himself points out.<ref>Sheridan, 1977: xi</ref>
 +
In this dictionary, in line with Lacan's own preference, the algebraic symbols are left as they are in the original French texts.
  
      1. Formalisation is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status
+
The algebraic symbols used by Lacan, which appear principally in the MATHEMES, SCHEMA L and the GRAPH OF DESIRE, are listed below, together with their most common meaning. However, it is important to remember that the symbols do not always refer to the same concept throughout Lacan's work, but are used in different ways as his work develops. The most important example of such a shift in meaning is the use of the symbol a, which is used in radically different ways in the 1950s and in the 1960s. However, even other symbols which are relatively stable in meaning are occasionally used in very different ways; for example, s nearly always designates the signified, but is used in one algorithm to denote the subject supposed to know (see Lacan, 1967). Therefore some caution should be exercised when referring to the following list of equivalences.
 
 
    (see SCIENCE). Just as Claude LÈvi-Strauss uses quasi-mathematical formulae in
 
 
 
    an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to
 
 
 
    do the same for psychoanalysis.
 
 
 
      2. Formalisation can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be
 
 
 
    transmitted integrally  even to those who have      never experienced psycho-
 
 
 
analytic treatment. The formulae thus become            an essential aspect of the
 
 
 
training of psychoanalysts which take their place alongside the training
 
 
 
analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.
 
 
 
      3. Formalisation of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a
 
 
 
    means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards              as  an
 
 
 
imaginary lure which hinders            access to the symbolic. Rather than being
 
 
 
    understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipu-
 
 
 
    lated and read in various different ways (see E, 313).
 
 
 
      Most English translations of Lacan also translate the algebraic symbols
 
 
 
    which appear in his work. For example, Alan Sheridan, in his translation of
 
 
 
    Ecrits, renders the symbol A (for Autre) as O (for Other). However, Lacan was
 
 
 
    opposed to such a practice, as Sheridan himself points out (Sheridan, 1977: xi).
 
 
 
    In this dictionary, in line with Lacan's own preference, the algebraic symbols
 
 
 
    are left as they are in the original French texts.
 
 
 
        The algebraic symbols used by Lacan, which appear principally in the
 
 
 
    MATHEMES, SCHEMA L and the GRAPH OF DESIRE, are listed below, together with
 
 
 
    their most common meaning. However, it is important to remember that the
 
 
 
    symbols do not always refer to the same concept throughout Lacan's work, but
 
 
 
    are used in different ways as his work develops. The most important example
 
 
 
    of such a shift in meaning is the use of the symbol a, which is used in radically
 
 
 
    different ways in the 1950s and in the 1960s. However, even other symbols
 
 
 
    which are relatively stable in meaning are occasionally used in very different
 
 
 
    ways; for example, s nearly always designates the signified, but is used in one
 
 
 
    algorithm to denote the subject supposed to know (see Lacan, 1967). Therefore
 
 
 
    some caution should be exercised when referring to the following list of
 
 
 
    equivalences.
 
  
 
A        = the big Other
 
A        = the big Other
 +
A        = the barred Other
 +
a        = (see objet petit a)
 +
a'        = (see objet petit a)
 +
S          =
 +
1. (before 1957) the subject
 +
2. (from 1957 on) the signifier
 +
3. (in the schemas of Sade) the raw subject of pleasure
 +
S          = the barred subject
 +
Si        = the master signifier
 +
S2        = the signifying chain/knowledge
 +
s          = the signified (in the Saussurean algorithm)
 +
S(A)    = the signifier of a lack in the Others
 +
(A)    = the signification of the Other (the messagelsymptom)
 +
D        = demand
 +
d          = desire
 +
m        = the ego (moi)
 +
i          = the specular image (schema R)
 +
i(a)      =
 +
1. the specular image (graph of desire)
 +
2. the ideal ego (optical model)
 +
I          = the ego-ideal (schema R)
 +
I(A)    = the ego-ideal (graph of desire)
 +
H        = the real phallus
 +
<fi        = the symbolic phallus [upper-case phi]
 +
9          = the imaginary phallus [lower-case phi]
 +
(-9)    = castration [minus phi]
 +
S          = the symbolic order (schema R)
 +
R        = the field of reality (schema R)
 +
I          = the imaginary order (schema R)
 +
P        = the symbolic father/Name-of-the-Father
 +
p          = the imaginary father
 +
M      = the symbolic mother
 +
J        = jouissance
 +
Je        = phallic jouissance
 +
JA      = the jouissance of the other
 +
E        = the statement
 +
e        = the enunciation
 +
V        = the will to enjoy (volontÈ de jouissance)
  
      A        = the barred Other
+
The typographical details and diacritics are extremely important in Lacanian algebra. The difference between upper- and lower-case symbols, the difference between italicised and non-italicised symbols, the use of the apostrophe, the minus sign, and subscripts; all these details play their part in the algebraic system. For example the upper-case letters usually refer to the symbolic order, whereas the lower-case letters usually refer to the imaginary. The use of the bar is also important, and varies even within the same formula.
 
 
      a        = (see objet petit a)
 
 
 
      a'        = (see objet petit a)
 
 
 
      S          = 1. (before 1957) the subject
 
 
 
                    2. (from 1957 on) the signifier
 
 
 
                      3. (in the schemas of Sade) the raw subject of pleasure
 
 
 
      S          = the barred subject
 
 
 
      Si        = the master signifier
 
 
 
      S2        = the signifying chain/knowledge
 
 
 
      s          = the signified (in the Saussurean algorithm)
 
 
 
      S(A)    = the signifier of a lack in the Other
 
 
 
      s(A)    = the signification of the Other (the messagelsymptom)
 
 
 
      D        = demand
 
 
 
      d          = desire
 
 
 
      m        = the ego (moi)
 
 
 
      i          = the specular image (schema R)
 
 
 
      i(a)      = 1. the specular image (graph of desire)
 
 
 
                      2. the ideal ego (optical model)
 
 
 
      I          = the ego-ideal (schema R)
 
 
 
      I(A)    = the ego-ideal (graph of desire)
 
 
 
      H        = the real phallus
 
 
 
      <fi        = the symbolic phallus [upper-case phi]
 
 
 
      9          = the imaginary phallus [lower-case phi]
 
 
 
      (-9)    = castration [minus phi]
 
 
 
      S          = the symbolic order (schema R)
 
 
 
      R        = the field of reality (schema R)
 
 
 
      I          = the imaginary order (schema R)
 
 
 
      P        = the symbolic father/Name-of-the-Father
 
 
 
      p          = the imaginary father
 
 
 
      M      = the symbolic mother
 
 
 
      J        = jouissance
 
 
 
      Je        = phallic jouissance
 
 
 
      JA      = the jouissance of the other
 
 
 
      E        = the statement
 
 
 
      e        = the enunciation
 
 
 
      V        = the will to enjoy (volontÈ de jouissance)
 
 
 
  The typographical details and diacritics are extremely important in Lacanian
 
 
 
algebra. The difference between upper- and lower-case symbols, the difference
 
 
 
  between italicised and non-italicised symbols, the use of the apostrophe, the
 
 
 
  minus sign, and subscripts; all these details play their part in the algebraic
 
 
 
system. For example the upper-case letters usually refer to the symbolic order,
 
 
 
  
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
  
  
 +
==See Also==
  
whereas the lower-case letters usually refer to the imaginary. The use of the
 
  
bar is also important, and varies even within the same formula.
+
[[Category:Terms]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Science]]
 +
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]

Revision as of 03:53, 22 May 2006

Algebra (algèbre) is a branch of mathematics which reduces the solution of problems to manipulations of symbolic expressions. Lacan begins to use algebraic symbols in his work in 1955 (see schema L), in an attempt to formalise psychoanalysis. Three main reasons lie behind this attempt at formalisation:

1. Formalisation is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status (see science). Just as Claude Lévi-Strauss uses quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to do the same for psychoanalysis.

2. Formalisation can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced psychoanalytic treatment. The formulae thus become an essential aspect of the training of psychoanalysts which take their place alongside the training analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.

3. Formalisation of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards as an imaginary lure which hinders access to the symbolic. Rather than being understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.[1]

Most English translations of Lacan also translate the algebraic symbols which appear in his work. For example, Alan Sheridan, in his translation of Ecrits, renders the symbol A (for Autre) as O (for Other). However, Lacan was opposed to such a practice, as Sheridan himself points out.[2] In this dictionary, in line with Lacan's own preference, the algebraic symbols are left as they are in the original French texts.

The algebraic symbols used by Lacan, which appear principally in the MATHEMES, SCHEMA L and the GRAPH OF DESIRE, are listed below, together with their most common meaning. However, it is important to remember that the symbols do not always refer to the same concept throughout Lacan's work, but are used in different ways as his work develops. The most important example of such a shift in meaning is the use of the symbol a, which is used in radically different ways in the 1950s and in the 1960s. However, even other symbols which are relatively stable in meaning are occasionally used in very different ways; for example, s nearly always designates the signified, but is used in one algorithm to denote the subject supposed to know (see Lacan, 1967). Therefore some caution should be exercised when referring to the following list of equivalences.

A = the big Other A = the barred Other a = (see objet petit a) a' = (see objet petit a) S = 1. (before 1957) the subject 2. (from 1957 on) the signifier 3. (in the schemas of Sade) the raw subject of pleasure S = the barred subject Si = the master signifier S2 = the signifying chain/knowledge s = the signified (in the Saussurean algorithm) S(A) = the signifier of a lack in the Others (A) = the signification of the Other (the messagelsymptom) D = demand d = desire m = the ego (moi) i = the specular image (schema R) i(a) = 1. the specular image (graph of desire) 2. the ideal ego (optical model) I = the ego-ideal (schema R) I(A) = the ego-ideal (graph of desire) H = the real phallus <fi = the symbolic phallus [upper-case phi] 9 = the imaginary phallus [lower-case phi] (-9) = castration [minus phi] S = the symbolic order (schema R) R = the field of reality (schema R) I = the imaginary order (schema R) P = the symbolic father/Name-of-the-Father p = the imaginary father M = the symbolic mother J = jouissance Je = phallic jouissance JA = the jouissance of the other E = the statement e = the enunciation V = the will to enjoy (volontÈ de jouissance)

The typographical details and diacritics are extremely important in Lacanian algebra. The difference between upper- and lower-case symbols, the difference between italicised and non-italicised symbols, the use of the apostrophe, the minus sign, and subscripts; all these details play their part in the algebraic system. For example the upper-case letters usually refer to the symbolic order, whereas the lower-case letters usually refer to the imaginary. The use of the bar is also important, and varies even within the same formula.

References

  1. see E, 313
  2. Sheridan, 1977: xi


See Also