Difference between revisions of "Being"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
=====Metaphysical and Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory=====
 
=====Metaphysical and Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory=====
 
=====Metaphysics and Philosophy=====
 
=====Metaphysics and Philosophy=====
[[Lacan]]'s use of the term "[[being]]" introduces a metaphysical note to his discourse that distinguishes it from most other [[school]]s of [[psychoanalytic theory]], which refuse to engage with their metaphysical and philosophical foundations.<ref>{{E}} p.228</ref>
+
[[Lacan]]'s use of the term "[[being]]" introduces a metaphysical note to his [[discourse]] that distinguishes it from most other [[school]]s of [[psychoanalytic theory]], which refuse to engage with their metaphysical and [[philosophical]] foundations.<ref>{{E}} p.228</ref>
  
 
=====Analyst in Relation to Being=====
 
=====Analyst in Relation to Being=====
[[Lacan]] argues that it is necessary for [[psychoanalyst]]s to engage with such concerns, for when the [[analyst]] intervenes his action "goes to the heart of [the analysand's] being," and this also affects his own [[being]], since he cannot "remain alone outside the field of play."<ref>{{E}} p. 228</ref>  Hence "it is certainly in the relation to being that the analyst has to find his operating level."<ref>{{E}} p.252</ref>
+
[[Lacan]] argues that it is necessary for [[psychoanalyst]]s to engage with such concerns, for when the [[analyst]] intervenes his [[action]] "goes to the heart of [the analysand's] being," and this also affects his own [[being]], since he cannot "remain alone [[outside]] the field of play."<ref>{{E}} p. 228</ref>  Hence "it is certainly in the relation to being that the analyst has to find his operating level."<ref>{{E}} p.252</ref>
  
 
=====Psychoanalytic Treatment=====
 
=====Psychoanalytic Treatment=====
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
=====Martin Heidegger=====
 
=====Martin Heidegger=====
[[Lacan]]'s discussion of [[being]] is clearly influenced by the ideas of [[Martin Heidegger]].
+
[[Lacan]]'s [[discussion]] of [[being]] is clearly influenced by the [[ideas]] of [[Martin Heidegger]].
  
 
=====Symbolic Order=====
 
=====Symbolic Order=====
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
=====Being and Existence=====
 
=====Being and Existence=====
Whenever [[Lacan]] opposes [[being]] to [[existence]], it is with [[existence]] in the [[real]], which contrasts with the [[symbolic]] function of [[being]].  Something may thus ''be'' without ''[[existence|existing]]'', when it is constructed from [[speech]] but finds no correlate in the [[real]] (e.g. the complete [[Other]]).  Conversely, something may ''[[existence|exist]]'' without ''[[being]]'', such as the "ineffable, stupid existence" of the [[subject]], which cannot be completely reduced to a signifying articulation.<ref>{{E}} p.194</ref>
+
Whenever [[Lacan]] opposes [[being]] to [[existence]], it is with [[existence]] in the [[real]], which contrasts with the [[symbolic]] function of [[being]].  Something may thus ''be'' without ''[[existence|existing]]'', when it is constructed from [[speech]] but finds no correlate in the [[real]] (e.g. the [[complete]] [[Other]]).  Conversely, something may ''[[existence|exist]]'' without ''[[being]]'', such as the "ineffable, stupid existence" of the [[subject]], which cannot be completely reduced to a signifying articulation.<ref>{{E}} p.194</ref>
  
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
==More==
 
==More==
[[Lacan]] coins the neologism '''[[parlêtre]]''' from the verbal noun ''[[être]]'' ("[[being]]") and the verb ''[[speech|parler]]'' ("[[speech|to speak]]") to emphasize his point that [[being]] is constituted in and through [[language]].  A [[human]] [[being]] is above all a [[parlêtre|speaking being]].
+
[[Lacan]] coins the neologism '''[[parlêtre]]''' from the [[verbal]] noun ''[[être]]'' ("[[being]]") and the verb ''[[speech|parler]]'' ("[[speech|to speak]]") to emphasize his point that [[being]] is constituted in and through [[language]].  A [[human]] [[being]] is above all a [[parlêtre|speaking being]].
 
-->
 
-->
  

Latest revision as of 02:41, 24 May 2019

French: être
Jacques Lacan
Metaphysical and Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalytic Theory
Metaphysics and Philosophy

Lacan's use of the term "being" introduces a metaphysical note to his discourse that distinguishes it from most other schools of psychoanalytic theory, which refuse to engage with their metaphysical and philosophical foundations.[1]

Analyst in Relation to Being

Lacan argues that it is necessary for psychoanalysts to engage with such concerns, for when the analyst intervenes his action "goes to the heart of [the analysand's] being," and this also affects his own being, since he cannot "remain alone outside the field of play."[2] Hence "it is certainly in the relation to being that the analyst has to find his operating level."[3]

Psychoanalytic Treatment
Loss of Being

Lacan also argues that during the course of the treatment the analyst is subjected to a progressive loss of being (désêtre), as he is gradually reduced to being a mere object for the analysand.

Martin Heidegger

Lacan's discussion of being is clearly influenced by the ideas of Martin Heidegger.

Symbolic Order

Being belongs to the symbolic order, since it is "the relation to the Other in which being finds its status."[4]

Lack of Being
Desire for Being

This relation, like the Other itself, is marked by a lack (manque), and the subject is constituted by this lack of being (manque-à-être), which gives rise to desire, a want-to-be (manque-à-être); desire is thus essentially a desire for being.

Being and Existence

Whenever Lacan opposes being to existence, it is with existence in the real, which contrasts with the symbolic function of being. Something may thus be without existing, when it is constructed from speech but finds no correlate in the real (e.g. the complete Other). Conversely, something may exist without being, such as the "ineffable, stupid existence" of the subject, which cannot be completely reduced to a signifying articulation.[5]


See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.228
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 228
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.252
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.251
  5. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.194