Difference between revisions of "Beyond the 'Reality Principle'"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(fixed references and a few typos)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
 
* [[Au-delà du 'principe de réalité']]
 
* [[Au-delà du 'principe de réalité']]
  
Line 8: Line 6:
 
Lacan's thinking here is as close as possible to analytic experience.  
 
Lacan's thinking here is as close as possible to analytic experience.  
  
"Language, before signifying something, signifies for someone": this expression as well as others announce the famous 1953 dcclarations in Rome (24).  
+
"Language, before signifying something, signifies for someone": this expression as well as others announce the famous 1953 declarations in Rome (24).  
 
Finally, Lacan attributes Freud's innovative exploration to "the dcsire to curc"; he even adopts the expression as his maxim.  
 
Finally, Lacan attributes Freud's innovative exploration to "the dcsire to curc"; he even adopts the expression as his maxim.  
  
Thc rest of the text is a series of long didactic and polemical theorctical elaborations, related as always to the ambition to create a "new psychological science" that would integrate "the phenomenological achievements of Freudism."  
+
The rest of the text is a series of long didactic and polemical theoretical elaborations, related as always to the ambition to create a "new psychological science" that would integrate "the phenomenological achievements of Freudism."  
 +
 
 +
Written at the time of the setback in Marienbad, this composite text promises a second installment that never came to light. In 1966. Lacan made "gestaltism and phenomenology" responsible for the fact that it was never written. In fact, he had not yet found his own way to answer two qucstions that were already clearly raised here: How is reality constituted for the subject'? How is the I, in which the subject recognizes himself, constituted?
  
Written at the time of the setback in Marienbad, this composite text promises a second installment that never came to light. In 1966. Lacan made "gestaltism and phenomenology" responsible for the fact that it was never writtcn. In fact, he had not yet found his own way to answer two qucstions that wcre already clearly raised here: How is reality constituted for thc subject'? How is the I, in which the subject recognizcs himself, constituted?
+
== References ==
 +
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
 +
<references/>
 +
</div>

Revision as of 16:09, 17 March 2007

The five pages analyzing the "revolution of the Freudian method" and "the phenomenological description of analytic experience" are enlightening."[1]


Lacan's thinking here is as close as possible to analytic experience.

"Language, before signifying something, signifies for someone": this expression as well as others announce the famous 1953 declarations in Rome (24). Finally, Lacan attributes Freud's innovative exploration to "the dcsire to curc"; he even adopts the expression as his maxim.

The rest of the text is a series of long didactic and polemical theoretical elaborations, related as always to the ambition to create a "new psychological science" that would integrate "the phenomenological achievements of Freudism."

Written at the time of the setback in Marienbad, this composite text promises a second installment that never came to light. In 1966. Lacan made "gestaltism and phenomenology" responsible for the fact that it was never written. In fact, he had not yet found his own way to answer two qucstions that were already clearly raised here: How is reality constituted for the subject'? How is the I, in which the subject recognizes himself, constituted?

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. pp. 81 - 85