* [[Au-delà du 'principe de réalité']]
The five pages analyzing the "[[revolution]] of the [[Freudian]] method" and "the [[phenomenological]] description of [[analytic]] [[experience]]" are enlightening."<ref>{{E}} pp. 81 - 85</ref>
* [[Au-delà du 'principe de réalité']]
The five pages analyzing the "revolution of the Freudian method" and "the phenomenological description of analytic experience" are enlightening."<ref>{{E}} pp. 81 - 85</ref>
[[Lacan]]'s [[thinking]] here is as close as possible to [[analytic experience]].
"[[Language]], before signifying something, signifies for someone": this expression as well as [[others]] announce the famous 1953 declarations in Rome (24). Finally, Lacanattributes [[Freud]]'s thinking here is innovative exploration to "the dcsire to curc"; he even adopts the expression as close as possible to analytic experiencehis maxim.
"Language, before signifying somethingThe rest of the [[text]] is a series of long didactic and polemical [[theoretical]] elaborations, signifies for someone": this expression related as well as others announce always to the famous 1953 dcclarations in Rome (24). Finally, Lacan attributes Freud's innovative exploration [[ambition]] to create a "the dcsire to curcnew [[psychological]] [[science]]" that would integrate "; he even adopts the expression as his maximphenomenological achievements of Freudism. "
Thc rest Written at the [[time]] of the setback in [[Marienbad]], this composite text is promises a series of long didactic second installment that never came to light. In 1966. Lacan made "gestaltism and polemical theorctical elaborations[[phenomenology]]" [[responsible]] for the fact that it was never written. In fact, related as always he had not yet found his own way to answer two qucstions that were already clearly raised here: How is [[reality]] constituted for the [[subject]]'? How is the ambition to create a "new psychological science" that would integrate "I, in which [[The Subject|the phenomenological achievements of Freudism." subject]] recognizes himself, constituted?
Written at the time of the setback in Marienbad, this composite text promises a second installment that never came to light. In 1966. Lacan made == References ==<div style="gestaltism and phenomenologyfont-size:11px" class="references-small" responsible for the fact that it was never writtcn. In fact, he had not yet found his own way to answer two qucstions that wcre already clearly raised here: How is reality constituted for thc subject'? How is the I, in which the subject recognizcs himself, constituted?><references/></div>
