Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Code

681 bytes added, 04:11, 24 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
[[Jacques Lacan]] borrows the term 'code' (''code'') from [[Roman Jakobson]]'s theory of [[communication]]. Jakobson presents his opposition 'code vs message' as an equivalent of [[Saussure]]'s ''[[langue]]'' vs ''[[parole]]''.However, Lacan draws an important distinction between the concepts of [[language]] and {{Top}}codes|code.<ref>see E, 84</ref> Codes are the province of animal communication, not of [[intersubjective communication]]. Whereas the elements of a language are [[signifier]]s, the elements of a code are ''indices'' (see [[index]]). The fundamental difference is that there is a fixed bi-univocal (one-to-one) relationship between an index and its [[referent]], whereas there is no such relationship between a [[signifier]] and a referent or between a signifier and a [[signified]]. Because of the bi-univocal relation of indices and referents, codes lack what Lacan regards as the fundamental feature of human languages: the potential for ambiguity and equivocation.<ref>see Lacan, 1973b</ref>{{Bottom}}
<ref>Lacan is not always consistent in maintaining this opposition between code and language. In the seminar of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the elementary cell of the =====Roman Jakobson=====[[graph of desireLacan]], he designates one point as the code, which he also designates as the place of the Other and the battery of signifiers. In this case, it is clear that borrows the term '"[[code]]" from [[Roman Jakobson]]' is being used in the same sense as the term 'language', namely, to designate the set s [[theory]] of signifiers available to the subject[[communication]].</ref>
[[Jakobson]] presents his opposition "[[code]] vs [[message]]" as an equivalent of [[Saussure]]'s ''[[langue]]'' vs ''[[parole]]''. =====Jacques Lacan==========Code and Language=====However, [[Lacan]] draws an important [[distinction]] between the [[concepts]] of [[language]] and [[code]].<ref>{{E}} p. 84</ref>  [[Code]]s are the province of [[animal]] [[communication]], not of [[intersubjectivity|intersubjective]] [[communication]].  =====ReferencesIndex and Signifier=====Whereas the elements of a [[language]] are [[signifier]]s, the elements of a [[code]] are [[indices]]. The fundamental difference is that there is a fixed bi-univocal (one-to-one) relationship between an [[index]] and its [[referent]], whereas there is no such relationship between a [[signifier]] and a [[referent]] or between a [[signifier]] and a [[signified]].  =====Ambiguity and Equivocation=====Because of the bi-univocal relation of [[indices]] and [[referent]]s, [[code]]s [[lack]] what [[Lacan]] regards as the fundamental feature of [[human]] [[language]]s: the potential for ambiguity and equivocation.<ref>{{L}} (1973b) "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|L'Étourdit]]", ''[[Scilicet]]'', no. 4, 1973. pp. 5-52<references/ref[[Lacan]] is not always consistent in maintaining this opposition between [[code]] and [[language]].
In the [[seminar]] of 1958-9, for example, when presenting the [[elementary cell]] of the [[graph of desire]], he designates one point as the [[code]], which he also designates as the [[place]] of the [[Other]] and the battery of [[signifier]]s.
In this [[case]], it is clear that the term "[[code]]" is [[being]] used in the same [[sense]] as the term "[[language]]," namely, to designate the set of [[signifier]]s available to the [[subject]].
==See Also==
{{See}}
* [[Communication]]
* [[Index]]
||
* [[Intersubjectivity]]
* [[Language]]
||
* [[Signified]]
* [[Signifier]]
{{Also}}
==References==
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
 
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:Language]]
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:OK]]
 
__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu