Difference between revisions of "Death drive"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(51 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Image:Kida_d.gif|right|frame|[[Kid A In Alphabet Land]]]]
 +
{{Top}}[[pulsion]] de [[mort]]]]''
 +
|-
 +
|| [[German]]: ''[[Todestrieb{{Bottom}}
  
 +
==Sigmund Freud==
 +
[[Sigmund Freud|Freud]] introduced the [[concept]] of the [[death drive]] in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'' (1920).
  
−
death drive (pulsion de mort)                     Although intimations of the concept of
+
Here he established a fundamental opposition between [[death drive|life drive]]s (''[[eros]]''), conceived of as a tendency towards [[cohesion]] and [[unity]], and the [[death drive]]s, which operate in the opposite direction, [[undoing]] connections and destroying things.
  
−
  the death drive (Todestrieb) can be found early on in Freud's work, it was only
+
The concept of the [[death drive]] was one of the most controversial [[:category:concepts|concepts]] introduced by [[Freud]], and many of his disciples rejected it, but [[Freud]] continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his [[life]].
  
−
  in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920g) that the concept was fully articu-
+
==Jacques Lacan==
 +
===Psychoanalysis===
 +
[[Lacan]] follows [[Freud]] in reaffirming the concept of the [[death drive]] as central to [[psychoanalysis]]:
 +
<blockquote>"To ignore the [[death instinct]] in his [Freud's] [[doctrine]] is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely."<ref>{{E}} p. 301</ref></blockquote>
  
−
  lated. In this work Freud established a fundamental opposition between life
+
===Nostalgia===
 +
In [[Lacan]]'s first remarks on the [[death drive]], in 1938, he describes it as a [[nostalgia]] for a [[preoedipal|lost harmony]], a [[desire]] to [[return]] to the [[preoedipal|preoedipal fusion]] with the [[mother]]'s [[breast]], the [[castration|loss]] of which is marked on the [[psyche]] in the [[complex|weaning complex]].<ref>{{1938}} p. 35</ref>
  
−
  drives (eros), conceived of as a tendency towards cohesion and unity, and the
+
===Narcissism===
 +
In 1946 he [[links]] the [[death drive]] to the [[narcissism|suicidal tendency]] of [[narcissism]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 186</ref>.
  
−
  death drives, which operate in the opposite direction, undoing connections and
+
By linking the [[death drive]] with the [[preoedipal phase]] and with [[narcissism]], these early remarks would [[place]] the [[death drive]] in what [[Lacan]] later comes to call the [[imaginary order]].
  
−
destroying things. However, the life drives and the death drives are never
+
===Symbolic Order===
 +
However, when [[Lacan]] begins to develop his concept of the [[order|three orders]] of [[imaginary]], [[symbolic]] and [[real]], in the 1950s, he does not situate the [[death drive]] in the [[imaginary]] but in the [[symbolic]].
  
−
  found in a pure state, but always mixed/fused together in differing proportions.
+
===Repetition===
 +
In the [[seminar]] of 1954-5, for example, he argues that the [[death drive]] is simply the fundamental tendency of the [[symbolic order]] to produce [[repetition]]:
  
−
Indeed, Freud argued that were it not for this fusion with erotism, the death
+
<blockquote>"The [[death drive|death instinct]] is only the mask of the [[symbolic order]]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 326</ref></blockquote>
  
−
  drive would elude our perception, since in itself it is silent (Freud, 193÷a
+
===Biological Instincts===
 +
This shift also marks a [[difference]] with [[Freud]], for whom the [[death drive]] was closely bound up with [[biology]], representing the fundamental tendency of every [[living]] [[thing]] to return to an inorganic [[state]].
  
 +
By situating the [[death drive]] firmly in the [[symbolic]], [[Lacan]] articulates it with [[culture]] rather than [[nature]]; he states that the [[death drive]] "is not a question of biology,"<ref>{{E}} p. 102</ref>, and must be distinguished from the [[biological]] [[instinct]] to return to the inanimate.<ref>{{S7}} p. 211-12</ref>
  
 +
===Sexual Drives===
 +
[[Another]] difference between [[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[death drive]] and [[Freud]]'s emerges in 1964.
  
−
      The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts
+
[[Freud]] opposed the [[death drive]] to the [[sexual]] [[drive]]s, but now [[Lacan]] argues that the [[death drive]] is not a [[separate]] [[drive]], but is in fact an aspect of every [[drive]].
  
−
introduced by Freud, and many of his disciples rejected it (regarding it as mere
+
<blockquote>"The [[distinction]] between the [[death drive|life drive]] and the [[death drive]] is - [[true]] in as much as it manifests two aspects of the [[drive]]."<ref>{{S11}} p. 257</ref></blockquote>
  
−
poetry or as an unjustifiable incursion into metaphysics), but Freud continued
+
Hence [[Lacan]] writes that "every [[drive]] is virtually a [[death drive]]" because:
 +
# every [[drive]] pursues its own extinction,
 +
# every [[drive]] involves the [[subject]] in [[repetition]], and
 +
# every [[drive]] is an attempt to go beyond the [[pleasure principle]], to the realm of [[excess]] ''[[jouissance]]'' where [[enjoyment]] is experienced as [[sadism|suffering]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 844</ref>
  
−
  to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life. Of the non-Lacanian schools of
+
==See Also==
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [[Biology]]
 +
* [[Death]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Drive]]
 +
* [[Imaginary]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Instinct]]
 +
* ''[[Jouissance]]''
 +
||
 +
* [[Kleinian psychoanalysis]]
 +
* [[Narcissism]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Nature]]
 +
* [[Pleasure principle]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Repetition]]
 +
* [[Symbolic]]
 +
{{Also}}
  
−
psychoanalytic theory, only          Kleinian psychoanalysis takes        the concept
+
==References==
 +
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
 +
<references/>
 +
</div>
  
−
seriously.
+
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]
 +
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Symbolic]]
 +
[[Category:Real]]
 +
[[Category:Subject]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 +
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Terms]]
  
−
      Lacan follows Freud in reaffirming the concept of the death drive as central
+
__NOTOC__
−
 
 
−
  to psychoanalysis: 'to ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to
 
−
 
 
−
misunderstand that doctrine entirely' (E, 301).
 
−
 
 
−
      In Lacan's first remarks on the death drive, in 1938, he describes it as a
 
−
 
 
−
nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the
 
−
 
 
−
  mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning
 
−
 
 
−
complex (Lacan, 1938: 35). In 1946 he links the death drive to the suicidal
 
−
 
 
−
tendency of narcissism (Ec, 186). By linking the death drive with the pre-
 
−
 
 
−
oedipal phase and with narcissism, these early remarks would place the death
 
−
 
 
−
drive in what Lacan later comes to call the imaginary order.
 
−
 
 
−
      However, when Lacan begins to develop his concept of the three orders of
 
−
 
 
−
imaginary, symbolic and real, in the 1950s, he does not situate the death drive
 
−
 
 
−
  in the imaginary but in the symbolic. In the seminar of 1954-5, for example, he
 
−
 
 
−
  argues that the death drive is simply the fundamental tendency of the symbolic
 
−
 
 
−
order to produce REPETITION; 'The death instinct is only the mask of the
 
−
 
 
−
symbolic order' (S2, 326). This shift also marks a difference with Freud, for
 
−
 
 
−
whom the death drive was closely bound up with biology, representing the
 
−
 
 
−
fundamental tendency of every living thing to return to an inorganic state. By
 
−
 
 
−
situating the death drive firmly in the symbolic, Lacan articulates it with
 
−
 
 
−
culture rather than nature; he states that the death drive 'is not a question of
 
−
 
 
−
bjology' (E, 102), and must be distinguished from the biological instinct to
 
−
 
 
−
return to the inanimate (S7, 211-12).
 
−
 
 
−
      Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's
 
−
 
 
−
emerges in 1964. Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives, but now
 
−
 
 
−
Lacan argues that the death drive is not a separate drive, but is in fact an aspect      -
 
−
 
 
−
of every DRIVE. 'The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is          -
 
−
 
 
−
  true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive' (gl 20). Hence
 
−
 
 
−
Lacan writes that 'every drive is virtually a death drive' (Ec, 844); because (i)
 
−
 
 
−
every drive pursues its own extinction, (ii) every drive involves the subject in
 
−
 
 
−
repetition, and (iii) every drive is          an attempt to go beyond the pleasure
 
−
 
 
−
principle, to the realm of exceSS JOUISSANCE where enjoyment is experienced
 
−
 
 
−
  as suffering.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
== ''Pulsion de mort'' ==
 
−
In ''Beyond the Pleasure Principle'' (1920) Freud established a fundamental opposited between life and drives (eros), conceived of as a tendency towards cohesion and unity, and the death drives, which operate in the opposite direction, undoing connections and destroying things.  However the life drives and the death drives are never found in a pure state, but always mixed/fused together in differing proportions.  Indeed, Freud argued that were it not for this fusuion with rotism, the death drive would elude our perception, since in itself it is silent.<ref>Freud 1930a: Se XXI, 120</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts introduced by Freud, and many of his disciplies rejected it, but Freud continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life.
 
−
 
 
−
Lacan follows Freud in reaffirming the concept of the death drive as central to psychoanalysis.  "To ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely.'<ref> e 310</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
In Lacan's first remarks on the death drive, in 1938, he describes it as a nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning complex.
 
−
 
 
−
In 1946 he links the death drive to the suicidal tendency of narcissism.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
However when Lacan begins to develop his concept of the three orders, in the 1950s, he does not situate the death drive in the imaginary but in the symbolic.
 
−
He argues that th death drive is simply the fundamental tendency of the symbolic order to produce [[repetition]].
 
−
 
 
−
"the death instinct is only the mask of the symbolic order."<ref>s2 326</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
This shift also marks a difference with Freud, for whom the death drive was closely bound up with biiology, representing the fundamental tendency of every living thing to return to an inorganic state.
 
−
 
 
−
by situating the death drive firmly in the symbolic Lacan articulates it with cultural rather than nature; he states that the death drive "is not a question of biology," and must be distinguished from the biological instinct to return to the inanimate.<ref>E 102; s7 211-12</ref>
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964.
 
−
 
 
−
Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives, but now Lacan argues that the death drive is not a separate drive, but is in fact an aspect of every drive.
 
−
Hence Lacan writes that "every drive is virutally a death drive" because every drive pursures its own extinction, involves the subject in repetition, and constitutes an attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle, to the realm of excss ''jouissance'' where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.
 

Latest revision as of 05:11, 24 May 2019

Kid A In Alphabet Land
French: [[pulsion de mort]]
German: Todestrieb

Sigmund Freud

Freud introduced the concept of the death drive in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920).

Here he established a fundamental opposition between life drives (eros), conceived of as a tendency towards cohesion and unity, and the death drives, which operate in the opposite direction, undoing connections and destroying things.

The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts introduced by Freud, and many of his disciples rejected it, but Freud continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life.

Jacques Lacan

Psychoanalysis

Lacan follows Freud in reaffirming the concept of the death drive as central to psychoanalysis:

"To ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely."[1]

Nostalgia

In Lacan's first remarks on the death drive, in 1938, he describes it as a nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning complex.[2]

Narcissism

In 1946 he links the death drive to the suicidal tendency of narcissism.[3].

By linking the death drive with the preoedipal phase and with narcissism, these early remarks would place the death drive in what Lacan later comes to call the imaginary order.

Symbolic Order

However, when Lacan begins to develop his concept of the three orders of imaginary, symbolic and real, in the 1950s, he does not situate the death drive in the imaginary but in the symbolic.

Repetition

In the seminar of 1954-5, for example, he argues that the death drive is simply the fundamental tendency of the symbolic order to produce repetition:

"The death instinct is only the mask of the symbolic order."[4]

Biological Instincts

This shift also marks a difference with Freud, for whom the death drive was closely bound up with biology, representing the fundamental tendency of every living thing to return to an inorganic state.

By situating the death drive firmly in the symbolic, Lacan articulates it with culture rather than nature; he states that the death drive "is not a question of biology,"[5], and must be distinguished from the biological instinct to return to the inanimate.[6]

Sexual Drives

Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964.

Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives, but now Lacan argues that the death drive is not a separate drive, but is in fact an aspect of every drive.

"The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is - true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive."[7]

Hence Lacan writes that "every drive is virtually a death drive" because:

  1. every drive pursues its own extinction,
  2. every drive involves the subject in repetition, and
  3. every drive is an attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle, to the realm of excess jouissance where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.[8]

See Also

References

  1. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 301
  2. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Les complexes familiaux dans la formation de l'individu. Essai d'analyse d'une fonction en psychologie, Paris: Navarin, 1984 [1938]. p. 35
  3. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 186
  4. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p. 326
  5. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 102
  6. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 211-12
  7. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 257
  8. ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 844


Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/index.php?title=Death_drive&oldid=45324"