Difference between revisions of "Death drive"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
In his later wrirings [[Freud]] posits the existence of two broad categories of [[life instinct]]s (''[[Lebenstriebe]]'', also known as "[[Eros]]") and [[death instinct]]s (''[[Todoestriebe]]'', sometimes known as ("[[Thanatos]]").
 
  
The former are concerned with the creation of cohesion and unity; the latter with the undoing of connections and the destruction of unity.
+
==Death Drive and Freud ==
 +
The [[death drive]] (French: ''[[pulsion de mort]]'') is first elaborated by [[Sigmund Freud]] in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'' (1920).
 +
Here [[Freud]] posits a basic opposition between the [[life drive]] (''[[Lebestriebe]]'' or ''[[Eros]]'') and the [[death drive]] (''[[Todestriebe]]'' or ''[[Thanatos]]'').
 +
The former is concerned with the creation of cohesion and unity; the latter with the undoing of connections and the destruction of unity.
 +
According to [[Freud]], the [[death drive]] exhibits the tendency of all living beings to return to an inorganic state.
 +
All drives are regressive in that they seek to return to an earlier state or to recover a lost [[object]].
 +
Initially inward-directed, the death drive first manifests its existence in the human tendency to self-destruction; as it subsequently turns to the outside world, it takes the form of [[aggressivity|aggressive]] or destructive behavior.
  
The fusion of the two results in [[sadism]].
+
The theory of the death drive is, by Freud's own admission, speculative, and is grounded in the ddescriptions of the [[compulsion to repeat]].
 +
The fact that Freucd describes the death drive as 'silent' makes it difficult to supply concrete clinical evidence for its existence and the notion remains controversal, even though Freud continues to uphold it in his very last writings.
 +
Many post-Freudian analysts dismiss the notion of a death drive as mere speculation on Freud's part, but Klein adopts it whole-heartedly, regarding the tyranny of the early [[superego]] as it crushes the young child's [[ego]] as the first clinical manifestation of its power.
 +
(The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts introduced by Freud, and many of his disciples rejected it, but Freud continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life. Of the non-Lacanian schools of psychoanalytic theory, only Kleinian psychoanalysis takes the concept seriously.)
  
 +
==Death Drive and Lacan==
 +
[[Jacques Lacan]] (following Freud) reaffirms the concept of the [[death drive]] as central to [[psychoanalysis]]. 
 +
[[Lacan]] wrote: "to ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely."<ref>E, 301</ref>
  
====Return====
+
In 1938, [[Lacan]] describes the [[death drive]] as a [[nostalgia]] for a [[lost harmony]], a [[desire]] to [[return]] to the [[preoedipal]] fusion with the [[mother]]'s [[breast]], the [[loss]] of which is marked on the [[psyche]] in the [[weaning complex]].<ref>Lacan, 1938: 35</ref>
 +
In 1946, [[Lacan]] associates the [[death drive]] with the [[suicide|suicidal tendency]] of [[narcissism]].<ref>Ec, 186</ref>
 +
In the 1950s, [[Lacan]] does not situate the [[death drive]] in the [[imaginary]] (despite its association with the [[preoedipal phase]] and [[narcissism]]), but rather in the [[symbolic]].
 +
In the 1954-5 seminar, ''[[The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis]]'', Lacan states that the [[death drive]] is simply the fundamental tendency of the [[symbolic]] [[order]] to produce [[repetition]].
 +
"The death instinct is only the mask of the symbolic order."<ref>S2, 326</ref>
  
All [[drive]]s are regressive in that they seek to return to an earlier state or to recover a lost [[object]], and the [[death drive]] expresses the tendency, which is said to be found in all living beings, to annul all tension by reverting to an inorganic state.
+
==Death Drive and Biology==
 +
For Freud, the [[death drive]] was closely bound up with [[biology]].
 +
[[Lacan]] situates the [[death drive]] in the [[symbolic]].
 +
[[Lacan]] articulates it with culture rather than nature.
 +
[[Lacan]] states that the death drive "is not a question of biology."<ref>E, 102</ref>
 +
The [[death drive]] is not the [[biology|biological]] [[instinct]] to return to the inanimate.<ref>S7, 211-12</ref>
  
Initially inward-directed, the [[death drive]]s first manfiest their existence in the human tenency to self-destruction; as they subsequently turn to the outside world, they take the form of aggressive or destructive behavior.
+
==Death Drive and Drives==
 +
Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964.
 +
Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives.
 +
[[Lacan]] rejects Freud's thesis of a duality of life and death drives.
 +
[[Lacan]] argues that the [[death drive]] is an aspect of every [[drive]].
 +
The [[death drive]] is an aspect of every [[drive]].
  
 +
"The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is - true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive."<ref>gl 20</ref>
  
===
+
[[Lacan]] writes that "every drive is virtually a death drive;"<ref>Ec, 844</ref> because
 +
# every [[drive]] pursues its own extinction,
 +
# every [[drive]] involves the subject in [[repetition]], and
 +
# every [[drive]] is an attempt to go [[beyond the pleasure principle]], to the realm of [[excess jouissance]] where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.
  
The theory of the death drive is, by Freud's own admission, speculative, and is groundedn in descriptions of the compulsion to repeat.
+
The death drive strives, in Lacan's view, to go beyond the [[pleasure principle]] and to attain the painful joys of [[jouissance]].
  
The fact that Freud describes the death drive as "silent" makes it difficult to supply concrete clinical evidence for its existence and the notion remains contrversial, even though Freud continues to uphold it in his very last writings.
+
==See Also==
 +
* [[Death]]
 +
* [[Drive]]
  
Many post-Freudian analysts mismis the notion of a death drive as mere speculation on freud's part.
+
==Look Up==
 +
<ref>3, 1, 64-5, 94, 135 Conversations.</ref>
  
lacan tends t reject freud's thesis of a duality of life and death drives, arugin tthat the death drive is an aspect or component of all drives.
+
==References==
 +
<references/>
  
the death drive strives, in lacna's view, to go beyondd the pp and to attain the painful joys ofo jouissance
+
[[Category:Terms]]
==Beyond the Pleasure Principle==
+
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
+
[[Category:Concepts]]
In ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'' (1920), [[Sigmund Freud]] introduces the concept of the [[death drive]].
+
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]
 
+
[[Category:Real]]
 
+
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
 
The concept of the [[death drive]] was first articulated by [[Sigmund Freud]] in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]'' (1920).
 
 
 
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 

Revision as of 08:56, 28 August 2006

Death Drive and Freud

The death drive (French: pulsion de mort) is first elaborated by Sigmund Freud in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920). Here Freud posits a basic opposition between the life drive (Lebestriebe or Eros) and the death drive (Todestriebe or Thanatos). The former is concerned with the creation of cohesion and unity; the latter with the undoing of connections and the destruction of unity. According to Freud, the death drive exhibits the tendency of all living beings to return to an inorganic state. All drives are regressive in that they seek to return to an earlier state or to recover a lost object. Initially inward-directed, the death drive first manifests its existence in the human tendency to self-destruction; as it subsequently turns to the outside world, it takes the form of aggressive or destructive behavior.

The theory of the death drive is, by Freud's own admission, speculative, and is grounded in the ddescriptions of the compulsion to repeat. The fact that Freucd describes the death drive as 'silent' makes it difficult to supply concrete clinical evidence for its existence and the notion remains controversal, even though Freud continues to uphold it in his very last writings. Many post-Freudian analysts dismiss the notion of a death drive as mere speculation on Freud's part, but Klein adopts it whole-heartedly, regarding the tyranny of the early superego as it crushes the young child's ego as the first clinical manifestation of its power. (The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts introduced by Freud, and many of his disciples rejected it, but Freud continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life. Of the non-Lacanian schools of psychoanalytic theory, only Kleinian psychoanalysis takes the concept seriously.)

Death Drive and Lacan

Jacques Lacan (following Freud) reaffirms the concept of the death drive as central to psychoanalysis. Lacan wrote: "to ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely."[1]

In 1938, Lacan describes the death drive as a nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning complex.[2] In 1946, Lacan associates the death drive with the suicidal tendency of narcissism.[3] In the 1950s, Lacan does not situate the death drive in the imaginary (despite its association with the preoedipal phase and narcissism), but rather in the symbolic. In the 1954-5 seminar, The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, Lacan states that the death drive is simply the fundamental tendency of the symbolic order to produce repetition. "The death instinct is only the mask of the symbolic order."[4]

Death Drive and Biology

For Freud, the death drive was closely bound up with biology. Lacan situates the death drive in the symbolic. Lacan articulates it with culture rather than nature. Lacan states that the death drive "is not a question of biology."[5] The death drive is not the biological instinct to return to the inanimate.[6]

Death Drive and Drives

Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964. Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives. Lacan rejects Freud's thesis of a duality of life and death drives. Lacan argues that the death drive is an aspect of every drive. The death drive is an aspect of every drive.

"The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is - true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive."[7]

Lacan writes that "every drive is virtually a death drive;"[8] because

  1. every drive pursues its own extinction,
  2. every drive involves the subject in repetition, and
  3. every drive is an attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle, to the realm of excess jouissance where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.

The death drive strives, in Lacan's view, to go beyond the pleasure principle and to attain the painful joys of jouissance.

See Also

Look Up

[9]

References

  1. E, 301
  2. Lacan, 1938: 35
  3. Ec, 186
  4. S2, 326
  5. E, 102
  6. S7, 211-12
  7. gl 20
  8. Ec, 844
  9. 3, 1, 64-5, 94, 135 Conversations.