Difference between revisions of "Decathexis"
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Decathexis describes both the action and the result of withdrawing psychic energy—usually libido—away from where it had been attached to a psychic formation, a bodily phenomenon, or an object. | + | Decathexis describes both the [[action]] and the result of withdrawing [[psychic]] energy—usually libido—away from where it had been attached to a psychic [[formation]], a [[bodily]] phenomenon, or an [[object]]. |
| − | The idea of decathexis, or withdrawal of cathexis, is linked to the notion of psychic energy and occurs very early on in Freud's work, although the term itself or its equivalents are not explicitly used. As early as "The Neuro-Psychoses of Defence" (1894a), Freud outlines certain mechanisms for repressing representations when he writes that we have "an approximate fulfilment of the task if the ego succeeds in turning this powerful idea into a weak one, in robbing it of the affect—the sum of excitation—with which it is loaded" (1894a, p. 48). In fact the notion of decathexis first appears as a means of repression in his work on the paranoia of Justice Schreber: "It is quite possible that a detachment of the libido is the essential and regular mechanism of every repression" (1911c [1910], p. 71). But the important role eventually attributed to energy in the very constitution of the psyche would make decathexis a central notion, independent of the mechanism of repression. The nature of decathected mental structures or objects, the more or less massive modalities of the decathexis, and the fate of the withdrawn energy, all would have serious consequences. As Freud writes: "the liberated libido will be kept in suspension within his mind, and will there give rise to tensions and color his mood" (1911c [1910], p. 72), until it finds another attachment. In the case of paranoia it will hypercathect the ego. In "Mourning and Melancholia" (1916-17f [1915]), Freud studied the progressive withdrawal of cathexis from the lost object, this being necessary for the reality of loss to be finally acceptable. | + | The [[idea]] of decathexis, or [[withdrawal]] of [[cathexis]], is linked to the [[notion]] of psychic [[energy]] and occurs very early on in [[Freud]]'s [[work]], although the term itself or its equivalents are not explicitly used. As early as "The Neuro-[[Psychoses]] of [[Defence]]" (1894a), Freud outlines certain mechanisms for repressing representations when he writes that we have "an approximate fulfilment of the task if the ego succeeds in turning this powerful idea into a weak one, in robbing it of the affect—the sum of excitation—with which it is loaded" (1894a, p. 48). In fact the notion of decathexis first appears as a means of [[repression]] in his work on the [[paranoia]] of Justice [[Schreber]]: "It is quite possible that a detachment of the [[libido]] is the essential and regular [[mechanism]] of every repression" (1911c [1910], p. 71). But the important [[role]] eventually attributed to energy in the very [[constitution]] of the [[psyche]] would make decathexis a central notion, independent of the mechanism of repression. The [[nature]] of decathected [[mental]] [[structures]] or [[objects]], the more or less massive modalities of the decathexis, and the fate of the withdrawn energy, all would have serious consequences. As Freud writes: "the liberated libido will be kept in suspension within his [[mind]], and will there give rise to tensions and color his mood" (1911c [1910], p. 72), until it finds [[another]] attachment. In the [[case]] of paranoia it will hypercathect the ego. In "[[Mourning]] and [[Melancholia]]" (1916-17f [1915]), Freud studied the progressive withdrawal of cathexis from the [[lost object]], this [[being]] necessary for the [[reality]] of [[loss]] to be finally acceptable. |
| − | PAUL DENIS | + | [[Paul|PAUL]] DENIS |
| − | See also: Boredom; Cathexis; ; Dead mother complex; Dismantling; Fusion/defusion of the instincts. Repression; Sleep/wakefulness; Transference depression. | + | See also: Boredom; Cathexis; ; [[Dead]] [[mother]] [[complex]]; [[Dismantling]]; Fusion/defusion of the [[instincts]]. Repression; [[Sleep]]/wakefulness; [[Transference]] [[depression]]. |
| − | Bibliography | + | [[Bibliography]] |
| − | * Freud, Sigmund. (1894a). The neuro-psychoses of defence. SE, 3 : 41-61. | + | * [[Freud, Sigmund]]. (1894a). The neuro-psychoses of defence. SE, 3 : 41-61. |
| − | * ——. (1911c [1910]). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82. | + | * ——. (1911c [1910]). [[Psycho]]-[[analytic]] [[notes]] on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia ([[dementia]] paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82. |
| − | * ——. (1914c). On narcissism: an introduction. SE, 14: 67-102. | + | * ——. (1914c). On [[narcissism]]: an introduction. SE, 14: 67-102. |
* ——. (1915e). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82. | * ——. (1915e). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82. | ||
| − | * ——. (1916-17f [1915]). A metapsychological supplement to the theory of dreams. SE, 14: 217-235. | + | * ——. (1916-17f [1915]). A metapsychological [[supplement]] to the [[theory]] of [[dreams]]. SE, 14: 217-235. |
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:12, 24 May 2019
Decathexis describes both the action and the result of withdrawing psychic energy—usually libido—away from where it had been attached to a psychic formation, a bodily phenomenon, or an object.
The idea of decathexis, or withdrawal of cathexis, is linked to the notion of psychic energy and occurs very early on in Freud's work, although the term itself or its equivalents are not explicitly used. As early as "The Neuro-Psychoses of Defence" (1894a), Freud outlines certain mechanisms for repressing representations when he writes that we have "an approximate fulfilment of the task if the ego succeeds in turning this powerful idea into a weak one, in robbing it of the affect—the sum of excitation—with which it is loaded" (1894a, p. 48). In fact the notion of decathexis first appears as a means of repression in his work on the paranoia of Justice Schreber: "It is quite possible that a detachment of the libido is the essential and regular mechanism of every repression" (1911c [1910], p. 71). But the important role eventually attributed to energy in the very constitution of the psyche would make decathexis a central notion, independent of the mechanism of repression. The nature of decathected mental structures or objects, the more or less massive modalities of the decathexis, and the fate of the withdrawn energy, all would have serious consequences. As Freud writes: "the liberated libido will be kept in suspension within his mind, and will there give rise to tensions and color his mood" (1911c [1910], p. 72), until it finds another attachment. In the case of paranoia it will hypercathect the ego. In "Mourning and Melancholia" (1916-17f [1915]), Freud studied the progressive withdrawal of cathexis from the lost object, this being necessary for the reality of loss to be finally acceptable.
PAUL DENIS
See also: Boredom; Cathexis; ; Dead mother complex; Dismantling; Fusion/defusion of the instincts. Repression; Sleep/wakefulness; Transference depression. Bibliography
- Freud, Sigmund. (1894a). The neuro-psychoses of defence. SE, 3 : 41-61.
- ——. (1911c [1910]). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82.
- ——. (1914c). On narcissism: an introduction. SE, 14: 67-102.
- ——. (1915e). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). SE, 12: 1-82.
- ——. (1916-17f [1915]). A metapsychological supplement to the theory of dreams. SE, 14: 217-235.
