Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Defence

667 bytes added, 05:14, 24 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
{{Topp}}défense{{Bottom}}
==Sigmund Freud==
From his earliest works, [[Freud]] situated the [[concept]] of [[defence]] at the heart of his [[theory]] of [[neurosis]].
"[[defenceDefence]]" (refers to the reaction of the [[Frego]]. ''to certain interior stimuli which the [[défenseego]]'')perceives as dangerous.
From his earliest works==Defense Mechanisms==Although [[Freud]] later came to argue that there were different "mechanisms of defence" in addition to [[repression]], <ref>{{F}} ''[[Works of Sigmund Freud|The Question of Lay-Analysis]]'', 1926d. [[SE]] XX, 179</ref> he makes it clear that [[repression]] situated is unique in the concept of [[defencesense]] at that it is constitutive of the heart of his theory of [[neurosisunconscious]].
[[DefenceAnna Freud]] refers attempted to the reaction classify some of the these mechanisms in her book ''[[ego]] to certain interior stimuli which Anna Freud|The Ego and the [[egoMechanisms of Defence]] perceives as dangerous'' (1936).
Although ==Jacques Lacan==[[FreudLacan]] later came to argue that there were different "mechanism is very critical of defence" the way in addition to which [[repressionAnna Freud]],<ref>and [[Freudego-psychology]]. 1926d.</ref> he makes it clear that [[repressioninterpret]] is unique in the sense that it is constitutive concept of the [[unconsciousdefence]].
He argues that they confuse the concept of [[Anna Freuddefence]] attempted to classify some of these mechanisms in her book ''The Ego and with the Mechanisms concept of Defence[[resistance]] (1936).<ref>{{Ec}} p. 335</ref>
--For this [[reason]], [[Lacan]] urges caution when discussing the concept of [[defence]], and prefers not to center his concept of [[psychoanalytic treatment]] around it.
==Resistance==When he does discuss [[Lacandefence]], he opposes it to [[resistance]]; whereas [[resistances]] are transitory [[imaginary]] is very critical responses to intrusions of the way in which [[Anna Freudsymbolic]] and are on the side of the [[ego-psychologyobject]] interpret the concept , defences are more permanent [[symbolic]] [[structure]]s of [[subjectivity]] (which [[Lacan]] usually calls [[fantasy]] rather than [[defence]]).
He argues This way of distinguishing between [[resistance]] and [[defence]] is quite different from that of [[other]] [[school]]s of [[psychoanalysis]], which, if they confuse the concept of have distinguished between [[defence]] and [[resistance]] at all, have generally tended to [[regard]] [[defence with the concept of ]]s as transitory phenomena and [[resistance]]s as more [[stable]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.335</ref>
For this reason, ==Desire and Defence==The opposition between [[Lacandesire]] urges caution when discussing the concept of and [[defence]]is, and prefers not to center his concept of for [[Lacan]], a [[psychoanalytic treatmentdialectic]] around ital one.
When Thus he does discuss [[defence]]argues in 1960 that, he opposes it to [[resistance]]; whereas [[resistances]] are transitory imaginary responses to intrusions of like the [[symbolicneurotic]] and are on the side of , the [[objectpervert]], defences are more permanent "[[symbolicdefends]] himself in his [[structuredesire,]]s of " since "desire is a defence (''défense''), a [[subjectivityprohibition]] (which ''défense'') against going beyond a certain [[Lacanlimit]] usually calls in ''[[fantasyjouissance]] rather than [[defence]])''.<ref>{{E}} p.322</ref>
This way of distinguishing between [[resistance]] and In 1964 he goes on to argue:<blockquote>"To desire involves a defensive [[defencephase]] is quite different from that of other [[school]]s of [[psychoanalysis]], which, if they have distinguished between [[defence]] and [[resistance]] at all, have generally tended makes it identical with not wanting to regard [[defence]]s as transitory phenomena and [[resistance]]s as more stabledesire."<ref>{{S11}} p. 235</ref></blockquote>
==See Also=={{See}}* [[Ego--psychology]]* [[Fantasy]]||* [[Neurosis]]* [[Perversion]]||* [[Repression]]* [[Resistance]]||* [[Structure]]* [[Subject]]||* [[Treatment]]* [[Unconscious]]{{Also}}
The opposition between [[desire]] and [[defence]] is, for [[Lacan]], a [[dialectic]]al one.
Thus he argues in 1960 that, like the [[neurotic]], the [[pervert]] ==References==<div style="font-size:11px"defends himself in his desire,class=" since references-small"desire is a defence (''''), a prohibition ('''') against going beyond a certain limit in ''jouissance''.><refreferences/>{{E}} p.322</refdiv>
In 1964 he goes on to argue[[Category:Freudian psychology]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Treatment]][[Category:Practice]]{{OK}}
<blockquote>"To desire involves a defensive phase tht makes it identical with not wanting to desire."<ref>{{S11}} p.235</ref></blockquote>__NOTOC__
Anonymous user
Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/Special:MobileDiff/10821...45327"

Navigation menu