Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Depersonalization

32 bytes added, 21:51, 27 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
addressed, that is through the question of "derealization," which can be considered the result of a type of depersonalization.
[[Paul]] Schilder was one of the first authors to take an interest in depersonalization. He saw it as a function of the [[libido]]'s [[withdrawal]] of [[cathexis]] from the [[image]] of the [[body]]. Paul Federn believed it corresponded to an alteration of the distribution of [[narcissistic]] libido throughout the body and its boundaries. Hermann Nunberg associated it with the [[loss]] of a significant [[object]]. Clarence Oberdorf emphasized the polymorphism of the clinical situations in which it could be observed and Andrew Peto investigated the [[role]] of the precocious loss of [[introjection]]. Maurice Bouvet, in an important study entitled "Dépersonalisation et relation d'[[objet]]," demonstrated the similarity of [[structure]] between states of depersonalization in their various clinical forms and treated "depersonalization as a [[state]] of weakened ego structure." He insisted on the importance of a "rapprochement" with the object, that is a decrease in the creation of [[psychic]] distance to the object, whereby the object returns to the [[position]] it held in [[The Subject|the subject]]'s [[unconscious]] [[fantasies]]. He also pointed out the [[character]] of the [[object relation]] that made it a narcissistic object since "the maintenance of the ego structure . . . depends on its unconditional and absolute possession." Bouvet also noted the importance of the [[conflict]] between the [[need]] to [[introject]] the object and the [[fear]] of this introjection.
PAUL DENIS
* [[Freud, Sigmund]]. (1919h). [[The Uncanny|The uncanny]]. SE, 17: 217-256.
* ——. (1936a). A disturbance of memory on the Acropolis. SE, 22: 239-248.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu