Changes

{{Top}}[[discours]]{{Bottom}}

Thus =====Discourse of the famous Other=====The term "[[Lacan|Lacanian formuladiscourse]], "the unconscious is used by [[Lacan]] to emphasize the discourse of the Other" designates the ''[[unconsciousintersubjectivity|transindividual]] as the effects on the '' [[subjectnature]] of '''[[speechlanguage]] ''', the fact that is addressed to him from elsewhere; by another '''[[subjectspeech]] who has been forgotten, by another ''' always implies [[scene|psychic localityanother]] (the other [[scenesubject]]), an interlocutor.

===Social Bond===In 1969, The '''[[Lacanunconscious]] begins to use ''' is the term "[[discourse|discourse of the Other]]" in a slightly different way, though one that still carries with it the stress effect on the [[subject]] of [[speech]] that is addressed to that [[subject]] from elsewhere, by another [[subject]] (who has been [[memory|forgotten]]), by an [[scene|other scene]] or [[intersubjectivityscene|psychic locality]].

From this point on =====Social Bond=====In 1969, [[Lacan]] begins to use the term designates "[[discourse]]" to denote a "[[discourse|social bond]], founded in [[language]]."<ref>{{S20}} p. 21</ref>

He [[Lacanidentifies]] identifies ''four possible '' types of [[discourse|social bondbonds]], four possible articulations of the [[symbolic order|symbolic network]] which regulates [[intersubjectivity|intersubjective relations]].

=====Four Discourses=====These "[[discourse|four discourses]]" are the [[discourse|discourse of the master]], the [[discourse|discourse of the university]], the [[discourse|discourse of the hysteric]], and the [[discourse|discourse of the analyst]].

* the [[discourse]] of the '''[[master]]''',* the [[Lacandiscourse]] represents each of the '''[[four discoursesuniversity]] by an ''',* the [[matheme|algorithmdiscourse]]: each of the '''[[matheme|algorithmhysteric]] contains four ''', and* the [[algebraicdiscourse]] of the '''[[symbolanalyst]]s'''.

=====Four Algorithms=====[[Image:Lacan-fourdiscourselettersLetdis.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[Algebra]]ic [[symbol]]s from the [[Four Discourses]]]]

===Four Positions===What distinguishes Each of the [[discourse|four discourses]] from one another is the positions of these represented by an [[matheme|algorithm]] which contains ''four '' [[algebraic]] [[symbol]]s.

There are The names of these ''four positions in the '' [[matheme|algorithmsymbol]]s of are shown to the [[four discoursesright]], each of which is designated by a different name.

The names of the ''four positions are shown below; '' [[Lacansymbol]] gives s correspond to ''four'' different names to these [[discourse|positions at different points ]] in his work, and this figure is taken from each [[matheme|algorithm]] of the 1972-3 seminar.<ref>{{S20}} p[[discourse|four discourses]]. 21</ref>

Each [[Image:Lacan-structurefourdiscourses.jpgmatheme|thumbalgorithm]] of the [[discourse|250pxfour discourses]] has ''four'' different [[discourse|right|The structure of positions]] with which the ''four discourses'' [[symbol]]s correspond.

Each [[discourse]] is defined by writing Image:Discourse-Structure.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The structure of the four [[algebraicdiscourses]] [[symbol]]s in a different position.

The [[discourse|position]] of the ''four'' [[symbol]]s always remain in the same order, so each [[discoursematheme|algorithm]] is simply the result of rotating what distinguishes the [[symboldiscourse|four discourses]]s a quarter turnfrom one another.

The top-left position ("[[discourse|the agentfour discourses]]") is the dominant position which defines are distinguished from one another by the [[discourse|positions]] of these ''four'' [[symbol]]s in each [[matheme|algorithm]].

In addition to Each of the four [[symboldiscourse|four discourses]]s, each is defined by the [[mathemediscourse|algorithmposition]] also contains an arrow going from of the ''four'' [[discourse|agentsymbol]] to the s in its [[discoursematheme|otheralgorithm]].

The names of the ''four'' [[four discoursesdiscourse|positions]] are shown in the figure to the right.<ref>{{S20}} p. 21</ref>

=====Discourse of the Master=====[[Image:Lacan-fourdiscoursesMadis.jpg|thumb|right|[[Discourse]] of the [[Master]]]]The four discourses[[discourse]]of the [[master]] is the basic [[discourse]] from which the other [[three]] [[discourse]]s are derived.

===Arrows===In 1971, The '''dominant [[Lacanposition]] proposes that ''' is occupied by the position of [[master signifier]] ([[Image:SS1.gif]]), which represents the [[discoursesubject]] ('''S''') for another [[signifier]] or, more precisely, for all other [[signifiers]] ([[Image:SS2.gif]]); however, in this [[signification|agentsignifying operation]] there is also the position of the always a [[surplus]], namely, ''[[semblanceobjet petit a]]''.

In 1972, [[Lacan]] inscribes two arrows in the [[matheme|formula]]s instead of one; one arrow (which [[Lacan]] labels "impossibility") goes from the [[discourse|agent]] to the [[discourse|other]], and the other arrow (which The point is labelled "powerlessness") goes from [[discourse|production]] that all attempts at totalization are doomed to [[discourse|truth]].<ref>{{S20}} pfailure.21</ref>

==Discourse of the Master==[[Image:MASTERDISCOURSE.jpg|thumb|right|[[Discourse]] of the [[Master]]]]The [[discourse]] of the [[master]] is "masks the basic [[discoursedivision]] from which of the other three [[discoursesubject]]s are derived. "<ref>{{S17}} p. 118</ref>

The dominant position is occupied by the [[master signifierdiscourse]] (also illustrates clearly the [[Image:SS1.gifstructure]]), which represents of the [[subjectdialectic]] ('''S''') for another of the [[signifiermaster]] or, more precisely, for all other and the [[signifiers]] ([[Image:SS2.gif]]); however, in this signifying operation there is always a [[surplus]], namely, ''[[objet petit amaster|slave]]''.

The point [[master]] ([[Image:SS1.gif]]) is the [[discourse|agent]] who puts the [[slave]] ([[Image:SS2.gif]]) to [[work]]; the result of this work is a [[surplus]] (''[[objet (petit) a|a]]'') that all the [[master]] attempts at totalisation are doomed to failureappropriate.

The [[discourse]] of the [[master]] "masks the division of the subject."<ref>{{S17}} p. 118</ref>  The [[discourse]] also illustrates clearly the [[structure]] of the [[dialectic]] of the [[master]] and the [[slave]].  The [[master]] ([[Image:SS1.gif]]) is the [[discourse|agent]] who puts the [[slave]] ([[Image:SS2.gif]]) to work; the result of this work is a [[surplus]] (''[[objet (petit) a|a]]'') that the [[master]] attempts to appropriate.  ===The ==Discourse of the University=====[[Image:UNIVERSITYDISCOURSEUnidis.jpg|thumb|right|[[Discourse]] of the [[University]]]]

The [[discourse]] of the [[university]] represents the [[hegemony ]] of [[knowledge]], particularly [[visible ]] in [[modernity ]] in the [[form ]] of the hegemony of [[science]].

===The ==Discourse of the Hysteric=====[[Image:HYSTERICDISCOURSEHysdis.jpg|thumb|right|[[Discourse]] of the [[Hysteria|Hysteric]]]]

This [[discourse]] is that which points the way towards [[knowledge]].<ref>{{S17}} p. 23</ref>.

[[Psychoanalytic treatment]] involves "the [[structural intro- duction ]] introduction of the [[discourse ]] of the '''[[hysteric ]]''' by means of artificial [[conditions]]"; in other [[words]], the [[analyst]] "[[hysteria|hystericises]]" the [[patient]]'s [[discourse]].<ref>{{S17}} p. 35</ref>

===The ==Discourse of the Analyst=====[[Image:ANALYSTDISCOURSEAnadis.jpg|thumb|right|[[Discourse]] of the [[Analyst]]]]

The position of the [[discourse|agent]], which is the position occupied by the [[analyst]] in the [[treatment]], is occupied by ''[[objet (petit) a|objet petit a]]''; this illustrates the fact that the [[analyst]] must, in the course of the [[treatment]], become the [[cause]] of the [[analysand]]'s [[desire]].<ref>{{Sl7S17}} p. 41</ref> The fact that this [[discourse]] is the [[inverse]] of the [[discourse]] of the [[master]] emphasises that, for [[Lacan]], [[psychoanalysis]] is an essentially subversive [[practice]] which undermines all attempts at domination and [[master]]y.

The fact that this =====Discourse of the Capitalist=====In a few parts of his teaching (notably in his discourse in Milano), Lacan talked [[about]] a new kind of discoursewhich caracterizes our post-modern [[society]] is : the inverse discourse of the [[discoursecapitalist]] . The position of the [[agent]], is occupied by the [[subject]] ('''S'''), who does not address the other, but the [[truth]] (this position is now occupied by the [[mastersignifier]] ([[Image:SS1.gif]]), the [[Market]]). Through the Market, the [[subject]] ('''S''') can ask the [[knowledge]](''[[savoir] emphasises that]''), for ([[LacanImage:SS2.gif]]), Science and [[Technology]] to produce [[objects]] to be consumed (''[[objet petit a]]''). This objects are made to never feed completely the [psychoanalysis[subject's desire]] .This discourse is not part of the [[social]] bond [[theory]]. We notice that, in this discourse (contrary to the [[four discourses]]), an essentially subversive practice arrow hits the position of the truth. With the Discourse of the Capitalist, Lacan tried to account for a new kind of social bonds in which undermines all attempts at domination and [[masterThe Subject|the subject]]ybecome more and more individualistic, egoistic. The Market is here the new Truth which cannot be contradicted.<ref>

__NOTOC__</ref>