Difference between revisions of "End of analysis"
(→Sigmund Freud) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Sigmund Freud== | ==Sigmund Freud== | ||
| − | In ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'' | + | In ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'' [1937], [[Freud]] asks: |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | In ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'', [[Freud]] asks: | ||
<blockquote>Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?<ref>{{F}} ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]''. 1937. [[SE]] XXIII p.209-253</ref> </blockquote> | <blockquote>Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?<ref>{{F}} ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]''. 1937. [[SE]] XXIII p.209-253</ref> </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 7 August 2006
Sigmund Freud
In Analysis Terminable and Interminable [1937], Freud asks:
In Analysis Terminable and Interminable, Freud asks:
Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?[1]
Freud discusses the question of whether it is ever possible to conclude an analysis, or whether all analyses are necessarily incomplete.
Is analysis terminable? How, and in what sense?
- ↑ Freud, Sigmund. Analysis Terminable and Interminable. 1937. SE XXIII p.209-253
