Difference between revisions of "Formalization"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The [[translation]] of a proposition or [[body]] of propositions into a more more [[language]], such as that of [[mathematics]] or symbolic [[logic]], usually in [[order]] to clarify or explicate the information [[content]], as in the [[matheme]] of [[Lacan]].
  
The translation of a proposition or body of propositions into a more more language, such as that of [[mathematics]] or symbolic logic, usually in order to clarify or explicate the information content, as in the [[matheme]] of [[Lacan]].
 
  
[[category:Jacques lacan]]
+
 
 +
===Formalization of Psychoanalysis===
 +
 
 +
[[Three]] main reasons lie behind this attempt at [[formalization]].
 +
 
 +
:1. [[Formalization]] is necessary for [[psychoanalysis]] to acquire [[scientific]] status.
 +
 
 +
:Just as [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] uses quasi-[[mathematical]] [[formulae]] in an attempt to set [[anthropology]] on a more [[scientific]] footing, [[Lacan]] attempts to do the same for [[psychoanalysis]]
 +
 
 +
:[[Lacan]] used quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set [[psychoanalysis]] on a more [[scientific]] footing.
 +
 
 +
:2. [[Formalization]] can provide a core of [[psychoanalytic theory]] which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced [[psychoanalytic treatment]].
 +
 
 +
:The [[matheme|formulae]] thus become an essential aspect of the [[training]] of [[psychoanalysis]] which take their [[place]] alongside [[training|training analysis]] as a medium for the transmission of [[psychoanalytic]] [[knowledge]].
 +
 
 +
:3. [[Formalization]] of [[psychoanalytic theory]] in [[terms]] of [[algebraic]] [[symbols]] is a means of preventing [[knowledge|intuitive understanding]], which [[Lacan]] regards as an [[imaginary]] [[lure]] which hinders access to the [[symbolic]].
 +
 
 +
:Rather than [[being]] [[understood]] in an intuitive way, the [[algebraic]] [[symbols]] are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.<ref>{{E}} p.313</ref>
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
* [[Algebra]]
 +
* [[List of algebraic symbols]]
 +
* [[Matheme]]
 +
* [[Formalization]]
 +
* [[Science]]
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 +
[[Category:Science]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Science]]
 +
[[Category:Terms]]

Latest revision as of 02:40, 24 May 2019

The translation of a proposition or body of propositions into a more more language, such as that of mathematics or symbolic logic, usually in order to clarify or explicate the information content, as in the matheme of Lacan.


Formalization of Psychoanalysis

Three main reasons lie behind this attempt at formalization.

1. Formalization is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status.
Just as Claude Lévi-Strauss uses quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to do the same for psychoanalysis
Lacan used quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set psychoanalysis on a more scientific footing.
2. Formalization can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced psychoanalytic treatment.
The formulae thus become an essential aspect of the training of psychoanalysis which take their place alongside training analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.
3. Formalization of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards as an imaginary lure which hinders access to the symbolic.
Rather than being understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.[1]

See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.313

See Also