# Difference between revisions of "Formalization"

(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
|||

(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

+ | The [[translation]] of a proposition or [[body]] of propositions into a more more [[language]], such as that of [[mathematics]] or symbolic [[logic]], usually in [[order]] to clarify or explicate the information [[content]], as in the [[matheme]] of [[Lacan]]. | ||

− | |||

− | [[ | + | |

+ | ===Formalization of Psychoanalysis=== | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[Three]] main reasons lie behind this attempt at [[formalization]]. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :1. [[Formalization]] is necessary for [[psychoanalysis]] to acquire [[scientific]] status. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :Just as [[Claude Lévi-Strauss]] uses quasi-[[mathematical]] [[formulae]] in an attempt to set [[anthropology]] on a more [[scientific]] footing, [[Lacan]] attempts to do the same for [[psychoanalysis]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | :[[Lacan]] used quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set [[psychoanalysis]] on a more [[scientific]] footing. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :2. [[Formalization]] can provide a core of [[psychoanalytic theory]] which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced [[psychoanalytic treatment]]. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :The [[matheme|formulae]] thus become an essential aspect of the [[training]] of [[psychoanalysis]] which take their [[place]] alongside [[training|training analysis]] as a medium for the transmission of [[psychoanalytic]] [[knowledge]]. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :3. [[Formalization]] of [[psychoanalytic theory]] in [[terms]] of [[algebraic]] [[symbols]] is a means of preventing [[knowledge|intuitive understanding]], which [[Lacan]] regards as an [[imaginary]] [[lure]] which hinders access to the [[symbolic]]. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :Rather than [[being]] [[understood]] in an intuitive way, the [[algebraic]] [[symbols]] are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.<ref>{{E}} p.313</ref> | ||

+ | |||

+ | ==See Also== | ||

+ | * [[Algebra]] | ||

+ | * [[List of algebraic symbols]] | ||

+ | * [[Matheme]] | ||

+ | * [[Formalization]] | ||

+ | * [[Science]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | ==References== | ||

+ | <references/> | ||

+ | |||

+ | ==See Also== | ||

+ | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||

+ | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | ||

+ | [[Category:Science]] | ||

+ | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||

+ | [[Category:Science]] | ||

+ | [[Category:Terms]] |

## Latest revision as of 02:40, 24 May 2019

The translation of a proposition or body of propositions into a more more language, such as that of mathematics or symbolic logic, usually in order to clarify or explicate the information content, as in the matheme of Lacan.

### Formalization of Psychoanalysis

Three main reasons lie behind this attempt at formalization.

- 1. Formalization is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status.

- Just as Claude Lévi-Strauss uses quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to do the same for psychoanalysis

- Lacan used quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set psychoanalysis on a more scientific footing.

- 2. Formalization can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced psychoanalytic treatment.

- The formulae thus become an essential aspect of the training of psychoanalysis which take their place alongside training analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.

- 3. Formalization of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards as an imaginary lure which hinders access to the symbolic.

- Rather than being understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.
^{[1]}

## See Also

## References

- ↑ Lacan, Jacques.
*Écrits: A Selection*. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.313