# Difference between revisions of "Formalization"

Line 34: | Line 34: | ||

[[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||

[[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | ||

− | |||

[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||

[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||

[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] |

## Revision as of 15:54, 17 August 2006

The translation of a proposition or body of propositions into a more more language, such as that of mathematics or symbolic logic, usually in order to clarify or explicate the information content, as in the matheme of Lacan.

### Formalization of Psychoanalysis

Three main reasons lie behind this attempt at formalization.

- 1. Formalization is necessary for psychoanalysis to acquire scientific status.

- Just as Claude Lévi-Strauss uses quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set anthropology on a more scientific footing, Lacan attempts to do the same for psychoanalysis

- Lacan used quasi-mathematical formulae in an attempt to set psychoanalysis on a more scientific footing.

- 2. Formalization can provide a core of psychoanalytic theory which can be transmitted integrally even to those who have never experienced psychoanalytic treatment.

- The formulae thus become an essential aspect of the training of psychoanalysis which take their place alongside training analysis as a medium for the transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge.

- 3. Formalization of psychoanalytic theory in terms of algebraic symbols is a means of preventing intuitive understanding, which Lacan regards as an imaginary lure which hinders access to the symbolic.

- Rather than being understood in an intuitive way, the algebraic symbols are to be used, manipulated and read in various different ways.
^{[1]}

## See Also

## References

- ↑ Lacan, Jacques.
*Écrits: A Selection*. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.313