Changes

==Jacques Lacan===Jean-Paul Sartre==[[Lacan]]'s first comments on the [[gaze]] appear in the first year of his [[seminar]], in reference to [[Jean-Paul Sartre]]'s [[phenomenology|phenomenological analysis]] of "[[gaze|the look]]."<ref>The fact that the [[English ]] translators of [[Sartre]] and [[Lacan]] have used different [[terms ]] obscures the fact that both use the same term in [[French]] - ''[[gaze|le regard]]''.</ref> For [[Sartre]], the [[gaze]] is that which permits the [[subject]] to realize that the [[Other]] is also a [[subject]].

===Jean<blockquote>My fundamental connection with the Other-as-Paul Sartre===For subject must be able to be referred back to my permanent possibility of ''[[Sartrebeing]], seen'' by the Other.<ref>[[gazeJean-Paul Sartre|Sartre, Jean-Paul]] is that which permits the . ''[[subjectJean-Paul Sartre|Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]] to realize that the '', trans. Hazel E. Barnes, [[OtherLondon]] is also a , Methuen, 1958 [[subject]1943].p. 256</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>My fundamental connection with ==Subject==When the Other-as-[[subject must be able to be referred back to my permanent possibility ]] is surprised by the [[gaze]] of ''being seen'' by the [[Other]], the [[subject]] is reduced to [[shame]].<ref>[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Sartre, Jean-Paul]]. ''[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]]'', trans. Hazel E. Barnes, London, Methuen, 1958 [1943]. p. 256261</ref> [[Lacan]] does not, at this point, develop his own [[concept]] of the [[gaze]], and seems to be in general agreement with [[Sartre]]'s views on the [[subject]].<ref>{{S1}} p. 215</blockquoteref> [[Lacan]] is especially taken with [[Sartre]]'s view that the [[gaze]] does not necessarily concern the [[organ]] of [[sight]]:

===Subject===When <blockquote>Of course what ''most often'' manifests a look is the convergence of two ocular globes in my direction. But the [[subject]] look will be given just as well on occasion when there is surprised by a rustling of branches, or the [[gaze]] sound of the a footstep followed by [[Othersilence]], or the [[subject]] is reduced to shameslight opening of a shutter, or a light movement of a curtain.<ref>[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Sartre, Jean-Paul]]. ''[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]]'', trans. Hazel E. Barnes, London, Methuen, 1958 [1943]. p. 261257</ref> [[Lacan]] does not, at this point, develop his own concept of the [[gaze]], and seems to be in general agreement with [[Sartre]]''s views on the [[subject]].<ref>{{S1}} p. 215</refblockquote> [[Lacan]] is especially taken with [[Sartre]]'s view that the [[gaze] does not necessarily concern the organ of sight:

<blockquote>Of course what ''most often'' manifests a look ==Object==It is the convergence of two ocular globes only in my direction. But 1964, with the look will be given just as well on occasion when there is a rustling [[development]] of branches, or the sound concept of ''[[objet petit a footstep followed by silence, or ]]'' as the slight opening [[cause]] of a shutter[[desire]], or a light movement that [[Lacan]] devlops his own [[theory]] of the [[gaze]], a curtaintheory which is quite distinct from [[Sartre]]'s.<ref>{{S11}}</ref> Whereas [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] had conflated the [[gaze]] with the [[gaze|Sartreact of looking]], Jean-Paul[[Lacan]]. ''now separates the two; the [[gaze]] becomes the [[object]] of the [[Jean-Paul Sartregaze|Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontologyact of looking]]'', transor, to be more precise, the [[object]] of the [[drive|scopic drive]]. Hazel E. Barnes The [[gaze]] is therefore, Londonin [[Lacan]]'s account, Methuen, 1958 no longer on the side of the [[subject]]; it is the [[gaze]] of the [[1943Other]]. p. 257</ref></blockquote>

===Object=Split==It is only in 1964And whereas [[Sartre]] had conceived of an essential reciprocity between seeing the [[Other]] and being-seen-by-him, with [[Lacan]] now conceives of an antinomic relation between the development of [[gaze]] and the concept of ''[[objet petit agaze|eye]]'' as : the [[causegaze|eye]] which looks is that of the [[desiresubject]], that while the [[Lacangaze]] devlops his own theory is on the side of the [[gazeobject]], a theory which and there is quite distinct no coincidence between the two, since "You never look at me from the [[Sartreplace]]'sat which I see you."<ref>{{S11}}p. 103</ref> Whereas [[Sartre]] had conflated When the [[gazesubject]] with the looks at an [[gaze|act of lookingobject]], [[Lacan]] now separates the two; the [[gazeobject]] becomes is always already gazing back at the [[objectsubject]] of , but from point at which the [[gaze|act of lookingsubject]], or, to be more precise, the cannot see it. This [[objectsplit]] of between the [[drivegaze|scopic driveeye]]. The and the [[gaze]] is therefore, in [[Lacannothing]]'s account, no longer on the side of other than the [[subjectsplit|subjective division]]; it is itself, expressed in the [[gaze]] field of the [[Othervision]].

===The Gaze and The Eye=Film Theory==And whereas [[Sartre]] had conceived The concept of an essential reciprocity between seeing the [[Othergaze]] and being-seen-was waken up by-him, [[Lacanpsychoanalytic]] now conceives of an antinomic relation between the [[gazeart|film criticism]] and in the 1970s, especially by [[gaze|eyefeminist]]: the [[gazeart|eyefilm critics]] which looks is that . However, many of the these critics have conflated [[subjectLacan]], while 's concept of the [[gaze]] is on the side of with the [[objectSartre]], and there is no coincidence between the two, since "You never look at me from the place at which I see you."<ref>{{S11}} p. 103</ref> When an concept of the [[subjectgaze]] looks at an and other [[objectideas]], the on vision such as [[objectFoucault]] is always already gazing back at the 's account of [[subjectFoucault|panopticism]], but from point at which the [[subject]] cannot see it. This Much of so-called "[[splitLacan]] between the ian [[gazeart|eye]] and the [[gazefilm theory]] " is nothing other than thus the site of great [[split|subjective divisionconceptual]] itself, expressed in the field of visionconfusion.

===Film Criticism===The concept of the [[gaze]] was waken up by [[psychoanalytic]] [[art|film criticism]] in the 1970s, especially by [[feminist]] [[art|film criticism|film critics]]. However, many of these critics have conflated [[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[gaze]] with the [[Sartre]]an concept of the [[gaze]] and other ideas on vision such as [[Foucault]]'s account of [[Foucault|panopticism]]. Much of so-called "[[Lacan]]ian [[art|film theory]]" is thus the site of great conceptual confusion. ==See Also==

==References==