Changes

With his prior experience with =Jacques Lacan===Jean-Paul Sartre==[[Lacan]]'s first comments on the [[gaze ]] appear in hypnosis and with the first year of his invention of the analytic couch[[seminar]], Freud showed that he was acutely aware in reference to [[Jean-Paul Sartre]]'s [[phenomenology|phenomenological analysis]] of "[[gaze|the important axis look]]."<ref>The fact that ran from the eye [[English]] translators of the analyst to the look of the analysand [[Sartre]] and of [[Lacan]] have used different [[terms]] obscures the perceptual asymmetry that resulted from it. He openly declared fact that he could not bear to spend his entire working day being stared at by both use the patients he was treatingsame term in [[French]] - ''[[gaze|le regard]]''. Contrary to Jean Martin Charcot</ref> For [[Sartre]], he dispensed with the omnipotent look in treatment and even came [[gaze]] is that which permits the [[subject]] to consider it a kind of mistake. By characterizing realize that the look as an element of the scopic drive, he opened the way to [[Other]] is also a series of reflections preserved in his metapsychology, most notably, his study of the voyeur/exhibitionist opposition[[subject]].

The Gaze in Lacan refers to ==Subject==When the uncanny sense that the object of our eye's look or glance [[subject]] is somehow looking back at us, a feeling that affects us in surprised by the same way as castration anxiety (reminding us [[gaze]] of the lack at [[Other]], the heart of the symbolic order)[[subject]] is reduced to [[shame]]. We may believe that we are in control of our eye's look; however<ref>[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Sartre, any feeling of scopophilic power is always undone by the fact that the the materiality of existence (the Real) always exceeds the meaning structures of the symbolic orderJean-Paul]]. Lacan's favorite example for the Gaze is Hans Holbein's The Ambassadors (pictured here)[[Jean-Paul Sartre|Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]]'', trans. Hazel E. When you look at the paintingBarnes, London, it at first gives you a sense that you are in control of your look; howeverMethuen, you then notice a blot at the bottom of the canvas1958 [1943]. p. 261</ref> [[Lacan]] does not, which you can only make out if you look at the painting from the sidethis point, from which point you can make out that develop his own [[concept]] of the blot is[[gaze]], and seems to be in fact, a skull staring back at you. By having the object of our eyegeneral agreement with [[Sartre]]'s look look back at us, we are reminded of our own lack, of the fact that the symbolic order is separated only by a fragile border from views on the materiality of the Real[[subject]]. The symbols of power in Holbein's painting (wealth, power, ambition) are thus completely undercut<ref>{{S1}} p. The magical floating object "reflects our own nothingness, in the figure of the death215</ref> [[Lacan]] is especially taken with [[Sartre]]'s head" (Lacan, Four Fundamental 92). See view that the Lacan module on [[gaze]] does not necessarily concern the Gaze.[[organ]] of [[sight]]:

The ==Object==It is only in 1964, with the [[development]] of the concept of '''gaze''' (often also called '[[objet petit a]]''as the gaze''' or, in French, ''le regard''), in analysing [[Visual perception|visualcause]] of [[Mass media|mediadesire]], is one that deals with how an audience views other people presented. The concept [[Lacan]] develops his own [[theory]] of the [[gaze became popular with the rise of postmodern philosophy and social ]], a theory and was first discussed by which is quite distinct from [[1960sSartre]] 's.<ref>{{S11}}</ref> Whereas [[France|FrenchSartre]] had conflated the [[intellectualsgaze]] with the [[gaze|act of looking]], namely [[FoucaultLacan]]'s description of now separates the two; the [[medical gaze]] and becomes the [[Lacanobject]]'s analysis of the [[gaze's role in |act of looking]], or, to be more precise, the [[mirror stageobject]] development of the human [[psychedrive|scopic drive]]. This concept The [[gaze]] is extended therefore, in [[Lacan]]'s account, no longer on the framework side of the [[Feminism|feministsubject]] theory, where ; it can deal with how is the [[man|mengaze]] look at of the [[woman|womenOther]], how women look at themselves and other women, and the effects surrounding this.

== Forms of gaze Split==And whereas [[Image:Gericault_Insane.jpg|thumb|right|Sartre]] had conceived of an essential reciprocity between seeing the [[Théodore GéricaultOther]]'s ''Insane'' and being-seen-by-him, [[Lacan]]The now conceives of an antinomic relation between the [[gaze can be characterized by who is doing ]] and the looking[[gaze|eye]]: * the spectator's [[gaze: |eye]] which looks is that of the spectator who is viewing [[subject]], while the text. This [[gaze]] is often us, on the audience side of a certain text,* intra-the [[diegesis|diegeticobject]] gaze, where one person depicted in the text who and there is looking at another person or object in no coincidence between the texttwo, such as another character looking since "You never look at another,* extra-diegetic gaze, where me from the person depicted in [[place]] at which I see you."<ref>{{S11}} p. 103</ref> When the text [[subject]] looks at the spectator, such as an aside[[object]], or an acknowledgement of the [[fourth wallobject]], or* is always already gazing back at the camera's gaze[[subject]], but from a point at which is the gaze of the camera or the director's gaze[[subject]] cannot see it. These are not This [[split]] between the only forms of gaze. Other forms include the gaze of an audience within a "text within the text", such as [[Lisa Simpsongaze|eye]] and the [[Bart Simpsongaze]] watching the cartoon-within-a-cartoon ''is [[Itchy and Scratchynothing]]'' on ''other than the [[The Simpsonssplit|subjective division]]''itself, or editorial gaze, whereby a certain aspect of expressed in the text is given emphasis, such as in photography, where a caption or a cropping field of an image depicting one thing can emphasize a completely different idea[[vision]].

Other theorists such as Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen provide the idea ==Film Theory==The concept of the [[gaze as a relationship between offering and demanding gaze: indirect gaze is an offer ]] was taken up by [[psychoanalytic]] [[art|film criticism]] in the spectator1970s, especially by [[feminist]] [[art|film critics]]. However, where we initiate many of these critics have conflated [[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[gaze, and ]] with the subject is not aware [[Sartre]]an concept of this, the [[gaze]] and direct gaze other [[ideas]] on vision such as [[Foucault]]'s account of [[Foucault|panopticism]]. Much of so-called "[[Lacan]]ian [[art|film theory]]" is a demand by thus the subject, who looks at us, demanding our gazesite of great [[conceptual]] confusion.

Gaze can also be further categorized into the direction of the gaze, where the subjects are looking at each other, apart, at the same object, or where one is gazing at another who is gazing at something else.<br clear=all> == Effects of gaze =See Also=[[Image:Peleliu stare.jpg|right|250px|thumbnail|[[Tom Lea]]'s depiction of the "[[thousand yard stare]]" on [[Peleliu|Bliliou]] at the [[Battle of Peleliu]]]]{{See}}Gazing and seeing someone gaze upon another provides us with a lot of information about our relationship to the subjects, or the relationships between the subjects upon whom we gaze, or the situation in which the subjects are doing the gazing. The mutuality of the gaze can reflect power structure, or the nature of a relationship between the subjects, as proposed by * [[Catherine LutzDesire]] and [[Jane Collins]], where this "tell[s] us who has the right and/or need to look at whom". Gazing can often reflect emotion without speech - in Western culture, continued staring upon another can be quite unsettling upon the subject.  Although it may appear that "gaze" is merely looking at, * [[Jonathan SchroederDrive]] tells us that "it signifies a psychological relationship of power, in which the gazer is superior to the object of the gaze". The gaze characterizes and displays the relationships between the subjects by looking. This idea forms a basis of feminist analysis of texts. === Gaze and feminist theory ===The gaze is used in feminist theory as a means to demonstrate power asymmetries by what is termed ''male gaze'', whereby a man gazes at a woman. Such feminist theorists posit that since it is almost always the female who is being gazed upon by the male, the man exhibits power over the woman.  This form of gaze can be the sexual gaze by a man towards a woman (so called "taking a pass"), or the gazing of an image of a woman in some text or in the media. [[Laura Mulvey]], identifies the action of ''possessing'' a gaze as being an intrinsically male (the "'''male gaze'''"), and identifies the action of being gazed upon with the female. This harks back to binaries of male/active, female/passive. This idea of power relationships within the gaze can be continued to analyse gendered power relationships in the depictions of women in advertising. Some advertising presents women in a sexual manner, and it is argued that this degrades women because of the power that the gaze provides for heterosexual men viewing these advertisements. Furthermore, [[Erving Goffman]] in ''Gender Advertisements'' describes that in his study the placement of men was higher than that of women in an advertisement. This positioning forces the gaze asymmetrically, the male must look down to the woman, and the female up to the man. === Responses to "male gaze" ===Male gaze in relation to feminist theory presents asymmetrical gaze as a means of exhibiting an asymmetrical power relationship, that is, the male gazing upon a female renders the female having an unwanted gaze upon her. However, this may not necessarily be the case; many societies have women who enjoy being gazed upon, [[model (art)|models]] and [[beauty pageant]]s in Western society for example, have women who are willing to be gazed upon. Some second-wave feminist viewpoints would argue whether the women are actually willing or not. Women may be merely seeking to conform to the hegemonic norms constructed to the benefit of male interests that further underline the power of the male gaze. Evolutionary biological explanations for the male gaze also exist.| The question of whether a ''female'' gaze exists in contrast to the male one arises naturally in considering the so-called male gaze. Mulvey, the originator of the phrase "male gaze", argues that "the male figure cannot bear the burden of sexual objectification. Man is reluctant to gaze...". [[Nalini Paul]] describes '* 'Wide Sargasso Sea'', where the character Antoinette views Rochester and places a garland upon him to appear as a hero, and "Rochester does not feel comfortable with having this role enforced upon him; thus he rejects it by removing the garland and crushing the flowers." In the perspective of male gaze as merely possessing a gaze, the position of a female possessing the gaze is then the female assuming the male gaze. [[Eva-Maria Jacobsson]] supports this by describing a "female gaze" as "a mere cross identification with masculinity". However, disregarding the viewpoint of gendered possession of gaze as proposed by Mulvey above, there is Objet petit a lot of evidence to support a view of a female gaze, an objectification of men in some texts, such as in some advertisements and teenage magazines. The view that men are somehow reluctant to be gazed upon is also not necessarily supported, for example, at an exhibition called ''The Female Gaze'', where female artists study the male form, [[Therese Mulligan]] mentioned "To get these men who had leered at her on the street to strike these poses was amazing. And you could tell that they loved being looked at by her. These guys aren't attractive, but they sure think they are." The gaze can also be directed toward members of the same gender for several reasons, not all of which are sexual, such as in comparison of body image or in clothing. === Gaze and psychology ===[[Jacques Lacan]], early and influential theorist into [[child development]], found the concept of the gaze important in what he termed "the mirror stage", whereupon children gaze upon their own image and present themselves as the ideal ego.  == References ==* Felluga, Dino. "Modules on Lacan: On the Gaze." Introductory Guide to Critical Theory - see External links.* Jacobsson, Eva-Maria: ''A Female Gaze?'' (1999) - see External links* Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen: Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. (1996)* Lutz, Catherine & Jane Collins: ''The Photograph as an Intersection of Gazes: The Example of National Geographic''. (1994)* Mulvey, Laura: ''Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema'' (1975, 1992)* Notes on The Gaze (1998) - see External links.* Paul, Nalini: ''The Female Gaze'' - see External links* Schroeder, Jonathan E: ''Consuming Representation: A Visual Approach to Consumer Research''. == See also ==* [[Film theoryOptical model]]* [[Eye tracker]]||* [[Eye contactOther]]* [[Evil eyeJean-Paul Sartre]]* [[Staring contest]] == External links ==||* [http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/gaze/gaze.html Notes on The Gaze]* [http://www.staleywise.com/collection/doisneau/doisneau_1.html Robert Doisneau, ''Un regard Oblique'', 1948] - another effective photograph illustrating gaze * [http://www.ltcconline.net/lukas/gender/pages/gaze.htm The Male GazeSplit], with photographs of several advertisements.* [http://www.sla.purdue.edu/academic/engl/theory/psychoanalysis/lacangaze.html Modules on Lacan: On the Gaze]* [http://cid.nada.kth.se/pdf/cid_51.pdf A Female Gaze?] (.[[PDF file]Subject])* [http://www.sharp.arts.gla.ac.uk/e-sharp/articles/spring_2004/Nalini_Paul-Female_Gaze.htm The Female Gaze]* [http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2003/01/30/gaze/index_np.html Salon Life - The Female Gaze]* [http://www.rochestercontemporary.org/dc798.html Review of ''The Female Gaze: Women Look at Men'']{{Also}}

[[Category:Filmtheory]]