Difference between revisions of "Handbook of Inaesthetics"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(tag)
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Book Description==
 
==Book Description==
Didacticism, romanticism, and classicism are the possible schemata for the knotting of art and philosophy, the third term in this knot being the education of subjects, youth in particular. What characterizes the century that has just come to a close is that, while it underwent the saturation of these three schemata, it failed to introduce a new one. Today, this predicament tends to produce a kind of unknotting of terms, a desperate dis-relation between art and philosophy, together with the pure and simple collapse of what circulated between them: the theme of education.
+
Didacticism, romanticism, and classicism are the possible [[schemata]] for the knotting of art and [[philosophy]], the [[third]] term in this [[knot]] [[being]] the education of [[subjects]], youth in [[particular]]. What characterizes the century that has just come to a close is that, while it underwent the saturation of these [[three]] schemata, it failed to introduce a new one. Today, this predicament tends to produce a kind of unknotting of [[terms]], a desperate dis-relation between art and philosophy, together with the pure and simple collapse of what circulated between [[them]]: the theme of education.
  
Whence the thesis of which this book is nothing but a series of variations: faced with such a situation of saturation and closure, we must attempt to propose a new schema, a fourth type of knot between philosophy and art.
+
Whence the [[thesis]] of which this book is [[nothing]] but a series of variations: faced with such a [[situation]] of saturation and closure, we must attempt to propose a new [[schema]], a fourth type of knot between philosophy and art.
  
Among these “inaesthetic” variations, the reader will encounter a sustained debate with contemporary philosophical uses of the poem, bold articulations of the specificity and prospects of theater, cinema, and dance, along with subtle and provocative readings of Fernando Pessoa, Stéphane Mallarmé, and Samuel Beckett.
+
Among these “inaesthetic” variations, the reader will [[encounter]] a sustained debate with contemporary [[philosophical]] uses of the [[poem]], bold articulations of the specificity and prospects of theater, [[cinema]], and dance, along with subtle and provocative readings of Fernando Pessoa, Stéphane Mallarmé, and Samuel Beckett.

Latest revision as of 23:11, 24 May 2019

Books by Alain Badiou

Handbook of Inaesthetics.jpg

Book Description

Didacticism, romanticism, and classicism are the possible schemata for the knotting of art and philosophy, the third term in this knot being the education of subjects, youth in particular. What characterizes the century that has just come to a close is that, while it underwent the saturation of these three schemata, it failed to introduce a new one. Today, this predicament tends to produce a kind of unknotting of terms, a desperate dis-relation between art and philosophy, together with the pure and simple collapse of what circulated between them: the theme of education.

Whence the thesis of which this book is nothing but a series of variations: faced with such a situation of saturation and closure, we must attempt to propose a new schema, a fourth type of knot between philosophy and art.

Among these “inaesthetic” variations, the reader will encounter a sustained debate with contemporary philosophical uses of the poem, bold articulations of the specificity and prospects of theater, cinema, and dance, along with subtle and provocative readings of Fernando Pessoa, Stéphane Mallarmé, and Samuel Beckett.