|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | [[German]]: ''[[Imaginäre{{Bottom}} | | | [[German]]: ''[[Imaginäre{{Bottom}} |
| | | | |
| − | =====Jacques Lacan=====
| |
| − | [[Lacan]]'s use of the term "[[imaginary]]" as a substantive dates back to 1936.<ref>{{Ec}} p. 81</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Illusion=====
| |
| − | From the beginning, the term has connotations of illusion, fascination and seduction, and relates specifically to the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[specular image]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It is important to note, however, that while the [[imaginary]] always retains connotations of [[illusion]] and [[lure]], it is not simply synonymous with "the illusory" insofar as the latter term implies something unnecessary and inconsequential.<ref>{{Ec}} p. 723</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] is far from inconsequential; it has powerful effects in the [[real]], and is not simply something that can be dispensed with or "overcome".
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Order=====
| |
| − | From 1953 on, the [[imaginary]] becomes one of the [[order|three orders]] which constitute the tripartite scheme at the centre of [[Lacan]]ian thought, being opposed to the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Ego Formation=====
| |
| − | The basis of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] continues to be the formation of the [[ego]] in the [[mirror stage]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Identification=====
| |
| − | Since the [[ego]] is formed by [[identifying]] with the [[counterpart]] or [[specular image]], [[identification]] is an important aspect of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] form the prototypical [[dual relation]]ship, and are interchangeable.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Alienation=====
| |
| − | This relationship whereby the [[ego]] is constituted by [[identification]] with the [[other|little other]] means that the [[ego]], and the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] itself, are both sites of a radical [[alienation]];
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <blockquote>"Alienation is constitutive of the imaginary order."<ref>{{S3}} p. 146</ref></blockquote>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Narcissism=====
| |
| − | The [[dual relation]]ship between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] is fundamentally [[narcissistic]], and [[narcissism]] is another characteristic of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Narcissism]] is always accompanied by a certain [[aggressivity]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Deception=====
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] is the realm of image and imagination, [[truth|deception]] and [[lure]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The principal illusions of the [[imaginary]] are those of [[gestalt|wholeness]], [[dialectic|synthesis]], [[autonomous ego|autonomy]], [[dual relation|duality]] and, above all, [[counterpart|similarity]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Structure=====
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] is thus the [[order]] of surface appearances which are deceptive, observable phenomena which hide underlying [[structure]]; the [[affect]]s are such phenomena.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, the opposition between the [[imaginary]] and the [[symbolic]] does not mean that the [[imaginary]] is lacking in [[structure]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | On the contrary, the [[imaginary]] is always already [[structure]]d by the [[symbolic order]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For example in his discussion of the [[mirror stage]] in 1949, [[Lacan]] speaks of the relations in [[imaginary]] space, which imply a [[symbolic]] [[structure|structuring]] of that space.<ref>{{E}} p. 1</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The expression "[[imaginary|imaginary matrix]]" also implies an [[imaginary]] which is [[structure|structured]] by the [[symbolic]],<ref>{{Ec}} p. 221</ref> and in 1964 [[Lacan]] discusses how the visual field is [[structure|structured]] by [[symbolic]] [[law]]s.<ref>{{S11}} p. 91-2</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Linguistic Dimension=====
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] also involves a [[linguistics|linguistic dimension]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Whereas the [[signifier]] is foundation of the [[symbolic order]], the [[signified]] and [[signification]] are part of [[imaginary|imaginary order]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thus [[language]] has both [[symbolic]] and [[imaginary]] aspects; in its [[imaginary]] aspect, [[language]] is the "wall of language" which inverts and distorts the [[discourse]] of the [[Other]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Captation=====
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] exerts a [[captation|captivating power]] over the [[subject]], founded in the almost hypnotic effect of the [[specular image]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] is thus rooted in [[subject]]'s relationship to his own body (or rather to the [[image]] of his body).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This [[captation|captivating/capturing power]] is both [[seductive]] (the [[imaginary]] is manifested above all on the sexual plane, in such forms as sexual display and courtship rituals)<ref>{{L}} "[[Situation de la psychanalyse et formation du psychanalyste en 1956]]." ''[[Écrits]]''. Paris: Seuil, 1966 [1956b]: 272</ref> and disabling: it imprisons the [[subject]] in series of static fixations.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Nature=====
| |
| − | The [[imaginary]] is the dimension of the [[human]] [[subject]] which is most closely linked to ethology and animal psychology.<ref>{{S3}} p. 253</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | All attempts to explain [[human]] [[subjectivity]] in terms of animal psychology are thus limited to the [[imaginary]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Although the [[imaginary]] represents the closest point of contact between [[human]] [[subjectivity]] and animal ethology,<ref>{{S2}} p. 166</ref> it is not simply identical; the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] in [[human]] [[being]]s is [[structure]]d by the [[symbolic]], and this means that "in man, the imaginary relation has deviated [from the realm of nature]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 210</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Imagination=====
| |
| − | [[Lacan]] has a Cartesian mistrust of the [[imaginary|imagination]] as a cognitive tool.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | He insists, like Descartes, on the supremacy of pure intellection, without dependence on images, as the only way of arriving at certain [[knowledge]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It is this that lies behind Lacan's use of [[topology|topological figures]], which cannot be represented in the [[imaginary|imagination]], to explore the [[structure]] of the [[unconscious]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This mistrust of the [[imaginary|imagination]] and the senses puts [[Lacan]] firmly the side of [[science|rationalism]] rather than [[science|empiricism]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Imaginary Reductionism=====
| |
| − | [[Lacan]] accused the major [[school|psychoanalytic schools]] of his day of reducing [[psychoanalysis]] to the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]: these psychoanalysts made [[identification]] with the [[analyst]] into the goal of [[treatment|analysis]], and reduced [[treatment|analysis]] to a [[dual relation]]ship.<ref>{{E}} p. 246-7</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Lacan]] sees this as a complete betrayal of [[psychoanalysis]], a deviation which can only eveer succeed in increasing the [[alienation]] of the [[subject]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Symbolic in Analysis=====
| |
| − | Against such [[imaginary]] reductionism, [[Lacan]] argues that the essence of [[psychoanalysis]] consists in its use of the [[symbolic]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This use of the [[symbolic]] is the only way to dislodge the disabling fixations of the [[imaginary]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thus the only way for the [[analyst]] to gain any purchase on the [[imaginary]] is by transforming the [[images]] into [[word]]s, just as [[Freud]] treats the [[dream]] as a rebus:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <blockquote>"The imaginary is decipherable only if it is rendered into [[symbol]]s."<ref>{{L}} "[[Situation de la psychanalyse et formation du psychanalyste en 1956]]." ''[[Écrits]]''. Paris: Seuil, 1966 [1956b]: 269</ref></blockquote>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This use of the [[symbolic]] is the only way for the [[treatment|analytic process]] "to cross the plane of identification."<ref>{{S11}} p. 273</ref>
| |
| | | | |
| | =====See Also===== | | =====See Also===== |
| Line 136: |
Line 44: |
| | | | |
| | __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| − |
| |
| − | {{Encore}}
| |
| − | :* [[Imaginary register]], 90, 95, 107, 133
| |
| − | :: [[object a]] and, 92-94
| |
