Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Imaginary

2,057 bytes added, 00:10, 25 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
{| align="[[right]]" style="line-height:2.0em;margin-left:10px;align:right;text-align:right;background-color:#fcfcfc;border:1px solid #aaa"
| [[French]]: ''[[imaginaire]]''
|-
| [[German]]: ''[[Imaginäre{{Bottom}}
==Jacques Lacan==In the [[Jacques Lacan:Bibliography|work]] of [[Jacques Lacan]], the [[real]], the [[symbolic]], and the [[imaginary]] are a central [[order|set of references]]. The [[imaginary]] is the [[order|field]] of the [[ego]].<!--
In the [[Jacques Lacan:Bibliography|work]] of [[Jacques Lacan]], the [[real]], the [[symbolic]], and the [[imaginary]] are a central [[order|set of references]]. The [[imaginary]] is the [[order|field]] of the [[ego]].
-->==Jacques Lacan==<!--
=====History=====
[[Lacan]]'s use of the term "[[imaginary]]" as a substantive dates back to [[{{Y}}|1936]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 81</ref> The term relates to the [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[specular image]]. From [[{{Y}}|1953 ]] on, the [[imaginary]] becomes one of the [[order|three orders]] which constitute the [[order|tripartite scheme ]] at the centre center of [[Lacan]]ian [[thought]], being opposed to the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]]. --><!--It took Lacan twenty years to restore the imaginary to its [[full]] [[place]] alongside the real and [[the symbolic]], which he did within the topic of the Borromean [[knot]] (a set of [[three]] interlinked rings that come apart if any one is removed).--><!-- In his 1936 essay "Au-delà du 'principe de réalité"' (Beyond the [[reality ]] [[principle]]), Lacan noted that [[Freud ]] discovered a [[meaning ]] in [[patients]]' complaints that [[other ]] physicians considered imaginary and thus [[illusory]]. In his first [[reading ]] of Freud's [[work]], Lacan emphasized the [[notion ]] of the image by highlighting its function: reflecting the subject's discrete behaviors in [[unified ]] [[images]]. In the [[mirror ]] [[stage]], the subject [[identifies ]] with these images and develops an ego [[concept ]] in relation to [[another]]. -->=====Ego=====The [[imaginary|imaginary order]] is based on the [[formation]] of the [[ego]] in the [[mirror stage]]by [[identification]] with the [[counterpart]] (or [[specular image]]). The [[dual relation]] between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] is characterized by [[alienation]] and [[narcissism]].<!-- The basis of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] is based on the [[mirror stage]], in which whereby the [[subjectego]] is constituted by [[identification|identifies]] with its the [[counterpartother|little other]] or [[specular image] and develops an ego concept in relation to another.  Since the The [[ego]] is [[formation|formed ]] by [[identification|identifying]] with the [[counterpart]] or [[specular image]]. Thus, [[identification]] is an important aspect of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]. The [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] [[form ]] the prototypical [[dual relation]]ship, and are interchangeable. identification is essential to the structure of the imaginary [[order]] and to the [[development]] of the human ego.</i> The basis of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] is the [[mirror stage]], in which the [[subject]] [[identification|identifies]] with its [[counterpart]] or [[specular image] and develops an ego concept in relation to another. ((Since the [[ego]] is formed by [[identifying]] with the [[counterpart]] or [[specular image]], [[identification]] is an important aspect of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]. ))--><!--
This relation­ship whereby the [[ego]] is constituted by [[identification]] with the [[other|little other]] means that the [[ego]], and the [[imaginary|imaginary order]] itself, are both sites of a radical [[alienation]]; "Alienation is constitutive of the imaginary order."<ref>{{S3}} p. 146</ref>
The [[dual relation]]ship between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] is fundamentally [[narcissistic]], and [[narcissism]] is another characteristic of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]. [[Narcissism]] is always accompanied by a certain [[aggressivity]].
-->
The [[dual relation]]ship between the [[ego]] and the [[counterpart]] is fundamentally [[narcissistic]], and [[narcissism]] is another characteristic of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]. [[Narcissism]] is always accompanied by a certain [[aggressivity]].  =====Image=====
The [[imaginary]] is the realm of [[image]] and [[imagination]], [[truth|deception]] and [[lure]]. The principal illusions of the [[imaginary]] are those of [[gestalt|wholeness]], [[dialectic|synthesis]], [[autonomous ego|autonomy]], [[dual relation|duality]] and, above all, [[counterpart|similarity]].
<!--
The [[imaginary]] exerts a [[captation|captivating power]] over the [[subject]], founded in the almost hypnotic effect of the [[specular image]]. The [[imaginary]] is thus rooted in [[subject]]'s [[relationship]] to his own [[body]] (or rather to the [[image]] of his body). This [[captation|captivating/capturing power]] is both [[seductive]] (the [[imaginary]] is manifest­ed above all on the [[sexual]] plane, in such forms as sexual display and courtship [[rituals]])<ref>{{L}} "[[Situation de la psychanalyse et formation du psychanalyste en 1956]]." ''[[Écrits]]''. [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1966 [1956b]: 272</ref> and disabling: it imprisons the [[subject]] in series of static fixations.
-->
=====Psychology=====The [[imaginary]] exerts a is the [[captation|captivating powerdimension]] over of the [[human]] [[subject]] which is most closely linked to [[animal]] [[psychology]], yet it is [[structure]]d by the [[symbolic]], founded and this means that "in man, the imaginary relation has deviated [from the almost hypnotic effect realm of nature]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 210</ref><!--the [[specular imageimaginary]] represents the closest point of contact between [[human]]. The [[imaginarysubjectivity]] is thus rooted in and [[subjectanimal]]'s relationship to his own body (or rather to the [[imageethology]] of his body),<ref>{{S2}} p. This 166</ref> it is not simply identical; the [[captationimaginary|captivating/capturing powerimaginary order]] in [[human]] [[being]] s is both [[seductivestructure]] (d by the [[imaginarysymbolic]] is manifest­ed above all on the sexual plane, and this means that "in such forms as sexual display and courtship rituals)man, the imaginary relation has deviated [from the realm of nature]."<ref>{{LS2}} "p. 210</ref>All attempts to explain [[human]] [[subjectivity]] in [[terms]] of [[animal]] [[psychology]] are thus limited to the [[Situation de la psychanalyse et formation du psychanalyste en 1956imaginary]]." '' Although the [[imaginary]] represents the closest point of contact between [[human]] [[subjectivity]] and [[Écritsanimal]]''. Paris: Seuil, 1966 [1956b[ethology]: 272],<ref>{{S2}} p. 166</ref> and disabling: it imprisons is not simply identical; the [[subjectimaginary|imaginary order]] in [[human]] [[being]]s is [[structure]]d by the [[symbolic]] , and this means that "in series man, the imaginary relation has deviated [from the realm of static fixationsnature]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 210</ref>-->
===Psychology==Criticism=====The [[imaginaryLacan]] is the dimension of accused the major [[humanschool|psychoanalytic schools]] of reducing [[subjectpsychoanalysis]] which is most closely linked to the [[ethologyimaginary|imaginary order]] and .<!--[[animalLacan]] accused the major [[psychologyschool|psychoanalytic schools]].<ref>{{S3}} p. 253</ref> All attempts to explain of his day of reducing [[humanpsychoanalysis]] to the [[subjectivityimaginary|imaginary order]] in terms of : these [[animalpsychoanalysts]] made [[psychologyidentification]] are thus limited to with the [[imaginaryanalyst]]. Although into the [[imaginarygoal]] represents the closest point of contact between [[human]] [[subjectivitytreatment|analysis]] , and reduced [[animaltreatment|analysis]] to a [[ethologydual relation]],ship.<ref>{{S2E}} p. 166246-7</ref> it is not simply identical; the [[imaginary|imaginary orderLacan]] in sees this as a [[humancomplete]] [[beingbetrayal]]s is of [[structurepsychoanalysis]]d by , a deviation which can only eveer succeed in increasing the [[symbolicalienation]], and this means that "in man, of the imaginary relation has deviated [from the realm of nature[subject]]."<ref>{{S2}} p. 210</ref-->
===Criticism===
[[Lacan]] accused the major [[school|psychoanalytic schools]] of his day of reducing [[psychoanalysis]] to the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]: these psychoanalysts made [[identification]] with the [[analyst]] into the goal of [[treatment|analysis]], and reduced [[treatment|analysis]] to a [[dual relation]]ship.<ref>{{E}} p. 246-7</ref> [[Lacan]] sees this as a complete betrayal of [[psychoanalysis]], a deviation which can only eveer succeed in increasing the [[alienation]] of the [[subject]].
==See Also==
[[Category:Imaginary]]
[[Category:Development]]
__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu