Difference between revisions of "Jouissance"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Lacan’s concept of jouissance discloses the intricate interdependence between sexuality and the symbolic order; this interdependence subjects the biological body to a traversal by the signifier. Because the body is necessarily mediated by language, and the libidinal drive remains in excess of the limits of representation, jouissance tends to manifest itself symptomatically in the body as a kind of surplus meaning that resists symbolic mediation. In consequence, the subject tends to apprehend jouissance only in the Other’s body, and therefore as something beyond its grasp, something of which it has been deprived. Because jouissance for the subject is marked by such a lack, sexual relations between two subjects are always structured in relation to a missing third element—the phallus—that disallows the formation of a harmonious, complementary relationship. It was for this reason that Lacan made the notorious claim in his seminar Encore that "there is no sexual relation." The lack of relation between the sexes—or between any two subjects of either biological sex—distinguishes human sexuality from the instinctual satisfaction presumably at work in the animal realm. In the later stages of his career Lacan attempted to shed light on Freud’s notoriously unclear theories of femininity and sexual difference by introducing his concept of "sexuation." Lacan claimed that every neurotic subject experiences symbolic castration in one of only two possible ways. Though he qualified the modes of sexuation as "masculine" and "feminine," Lacan made clear that a subject’s sexuation need not correspond to its anatomical sex. This is so, for Lacan, because sexuation exposes a fundamental impasse or contradiction characteristic of human sexuality that results from the properly structural lack of adequation of the symbolic order with respect to the real.
 +
 +
==
  
 
'''''Jouissance''''' is a [[French language|French]] term which translated means "[[enjoyment]]" and is contrasted with ''[[plaisir]]''. In every sense of the word it is whatever "gets you off". Something that gives the [[subject]] a way out of its [[normative]] subjectivity through [[transcendent]] [[Bliss (feeling)|bliss]] whether that bliss or [[orgasmic]] [[rapture]] be found in [[text]]s, [[film]]s, works of [[art]] or [[sexual]] spheres; [[excess]] as opposed to [[utility]]. It is a popular term in [[postmodernism]] and [[queer theory]] used by [[Roland Barthes]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Judith Butler]], and others. [[Leo Bersani]] considers jouissance as intrinsically self-shattering, disruptive of a 'coherent [[self]]'.
 
'''''Jouissance''''' is a [[French language|French]] term which translated means "[[enjoyment]]" and is contrasted with ''[[plaisir]]''. In every sense of the word it is whatever "gets you off". Something that gives the [[subject]] a way out of its [[normative]] subjectivity through [[transcendent]] [[Bliss (feeling)|bliss]] whether that bliss or [[orgasmic]] [[rapture]] be found in [[text]]s, [[film]]s, works of [[art]] or [[sexual]] spheres; [[excess]] as opposed to [[utility]]. It is a popular term in [[postmodernism]] and [[queer theory]] used by [[Roland Barthes]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Judith Butler]], and others. [[Leo Bersani]] considers jouissance as intrinsically self-shattering, disruptive of a 'coherent [[self]]'.

Revision as of 18:58, 25 April 2006

Lacan’s concept of jouissance discloses the intricate interdependence between sexuality and the symbolic order; this interdependence subjects the biological body to a traversal by the signifier. Because the body is necessarily mediated by language, and the libidinal drive remains in excess of the limits of representation, jouissance tends to manifest itself symptomatically in the body as a kind of surplus meaning that resists symbolic mediation. In consequence, the subject tends to apprehend jouissance only in the Other’s body, and therefore as something beyond its grasp, something of which it has been deprived. Because jouissance for the subject is marked by such a lack, sexual relations between two subjects are always structured in relation to a missing third element—the phallus—that disallows the formation of a harmonious, complementary relationship. It was for this reason that Lacan made the notorious claim in his seminar Encore that "there is no sexual relation." The lack of relation between the sexes—or between any two subjects of either biological sex—distinguishes human sexuality from the instinctual satisfaction presumably at work in the animal realm. In the later stages of his career Lacan attempted to shed light on Freud’s notoriously unclear theories of femininity and sexual difference by introducing his concept of "sexuation." Lacan claimed that every neurotic subject experiences symbolic castration in one of only two possible ways. Though he qualified the modes of sexuation as "masculine" and "feminine," Lacan made clear that a subject’s sexuation need not correspond to its anatomical sex. This is so, for Lacan, because sexuation exposes a fundamental impasse or contradiction characteristic of human sexuality that results from the properly structural lack of adequation of the symbolic order with respect to the real.

==

Jouissance is a French term which translated means "enjoyment" and is contrasted with plaisir. In every sense of the word it is whatever "gets you off". Something that gives the subject a way out of its normative subjectivity through transcendent bliss whether that bliss or orgasmic rapture be found in texts, films, works of art or sexual spheres; excess as opposed to utility. It is a popular term in postmodernism and queer theory used by Roland Barthes, Jacques Lacan, Judith Butler, and others. Leo Bersani considers jouissance as intrinsically self-shattering, disruptive of a 'coherent self'.

For Barthes (1977, p.9) plaisir is, "a pleasure...linked to cultural enjoyment and identity, to the cultural enjoyment of identity, to a homogenising movement of the ego." As Richard Middleton (1990, p.261) puts it, "Plaisir results, then, from the operation of the structures of signification through which the subject knows himself or herself; jouissance fractures these structures."

The French ‘’jouissance’’ means basically ‘’enjoyment’’, but it has a sexual connotation (i.e. ‘orgasm’) lacking in the English word ‘enjoyment’, and is therefore left untranslated in most English editions of Lacan.

Lacan develops an opposition between ‘’jouissance’’ and pleasure. The pleasure principle functions as a limit to enjoyment; it is a law which commands the subject to ‘enjoy as little as possible.’

At the same time, the subject constantly attempts to transgress the prohibitions imposed on his enjoyment, to go ‘beyond the pleasure principle.’

However, the result of transgressing the pleasure principle is not more pleasure, but pain, since there is only a certainamount of pleasure that the subject can bear.

Beyond this limit, pleasure becomes pain, and this ‘painful pleasure’ is what Lacan calls ‘’jouissance’’: ‘’’jouissance’’ is suffering.”[1]

The term ‘’jouissance thus nicely expresses the paradoxical satisfaction that the subject derives from his symptom, or, to put it another way, the suffering that he derives from his own satisfaction.

The prohibition of ‘’jouissance’’ (the pleasure principle) is inherent in the symbolic structure of language, which is why ‘jouissance’’ is forbidden to him who speaks, as such.”[2] The subject’s entry into the symbolic Is conditional upon a certain initial renunciation of ‘’jouissance’’ in the castration complex, when the subject gives up his attempts to be the imaginary phallus for the mother.

The symbolic prohibition of enjoyment in the Oedipus complex (the incest taboo) is thus, paradoxically, the prohibition of something which is already impossible; its function is therefore to sustain the neurotic illusion that enjoyment would be attainable if it were not forbidden. The very prohibition creates the desire to transgress it, and ‘’jouissance’’ is therefore fundamentally transgressive.


The death drive is the name given to that constant desire in the subject to break through the pleasure principle towards the Thign and a certain excess ‘’jouissance’’; thus ‘’jouissance’’ is ‘the path towards death.”[3] Insofar as the drives are attempts to break through the pleasure principle in search of ‘’jouissance,’’ every drive is a death drive.


There are strong affinities between Lacan’sconcept of jouissance and Freud’s concept of the Libido. In keeping with Freud’s assertiont hat there is only one libido, which is masculine, Lacan states that jouissance is essentially phallic; “Jouissance, isnofar as it is sexual, is phallic, which means that it does not relate to the Other as such.”[4]

However in 1973 Lacan admits that there is a specificially feminine jouissance, a ‘supplementary jouissance’, which is beyond the pahllus’. A jouissance of the Other.[5] This feminine jouissance is ineffable.

In order to differentiate between these two forms of jouissance, Lacan introduces different algebraic symbols for each; Jd designates phallic jouissance, whereas JA designates the jouissance of the Other.

Kid A In Alphabet Land

Kida j.gif

Kid A In Alphabet Land Jumps Another Juicy 'Jaculator - That Jerk-Off, Jouissance!

You Displease Me, And You Think I Gain Pleasure From That! Heh! You Must Take Me For Some Masochistic Francophile! And You're The Substance I'm Paid With By My Lack Of Substance? You're Impossible! I'm Coming To Get You! - Fuck You, Jouissance!

  1. S7 184
  2. E 319
  3. s17 17
  4. S20 58
  5. S20, 58, 69)