Knowledge

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Revision as of 03:36, 5 September 2006 by Riot Hero (talk | contribs) (Imaginary Knowledge)
Jump to: navigation, search
French: connaissance/savoir

Jacques Lacan

The term "knowledge" has two meanings in Lacan's work:

Lacan distinguishes between two types of knowledge:

Symbolic Knowledge

Symbolic knowledge refers to both the knowledge of the subject's relation to the symbolic order, and also to that relation itself.

It is the articulation of signifiers in the subject's symbolic universe, the signifying chain (SS2.gif).

Unknown Knowledge

The "unconscious" is simply another name for symbolic knowledge insofar as it is an "unknown knowledge," a knowledge which the subject does not know it knows.

Absolute Knowledge

Psychoanalytic treatment involves a way to access symbolic knowledge, via a particular form of speech called free association.

The aim of psychoanalytic treatment is the progressive reveletion of symbolic knowledge to the subject, rather than "absolute knowledge," because the unconscious is irreducible; there is an inescapable division between the subject and knowledge.

Jouissance' of the Other

Symbolic knowledge is knowledge of the truth about one's unconscious desire.

In this sense, knowledge is a form of jouissance: "knowledge is the jouissance of the Other."[1]

Subject Supposed to Know

Symbolic knowledge does not reside in any particular subject, but is intersubjective.

However, this does not prevent one supposing that somewhere there is a subject who possesses this symbolic knowledge (the subject supposed to know).

The knowledge is attributed to the analyst by the analysand in psychoanalytic treatment.

The analysand attributes knowledge to the analyst in psychoanalytic treatment.

Imaginary Knowledge

Imaginary knowledge refers to the subject's self-knowledge of the subject in the imaginary order.

This self-knowledge, knowledge that the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), knowledge based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity, is constitutive of the ego.[2]

This self-knowledge, knowledge that the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity, is constitutive of the ego.[3]

This self-knowledge -- knowledge that the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity -- is constitutive of the ego.[4]

This illusory kind of self-knowledge -- knowledge that the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity -- is constitutive of the ego.[5]

This self-knowledge, which the subject acquires through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), knowledge based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity, is constitutive of the ego.[6]

This knowledge, which the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), knowledge based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity, is constitutive of the ego.[7]


This illusory kind of knowledge, which the subject acquires about himself through misunderstanding and misrecognition (méconnaissance), knowledge based on a fantasy of self-mastery and unity, is constitutive of the ego.[8]

"Paranoiac Knowledge"

Imaginary knowledge is called "paranoiac knowledge" by Lacan because it has the same structure as paranoia (both involve a delusion of absolute knowledge and mastery), and because one of the preconditions of all human knowledge is the "paranoiac alienation of the ego."[9]

Imaginary Obstacle to Symbolic Knowledge

Imaginary knowledge is an obstacle which hinders the subjects access to symbolic knowledge.

Psychoanalytic treatment must therefore continually subvert the subject's imaginary self-knowledge in order to reveal the symbolic self-knowledge which it blocks.

See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre XVII. L'envers de la psychanalyse, 19669-70. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p. 13
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  5. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  6. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  7. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  8. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 306
  9. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.2