Difference between revisions of "Lalangue"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
In the early 1970s, [[Lacan]] turned his attention more and more to the [[place]] of ''jouissance'' in [[human]] [[sexuality]], the field he had discussed with such subtety in the late 1950s with the [[theoretical]] tools of [[desire]] and the [[phallus]].  Whereas [[language]] and ''[[jouissance]]'' had remained distinct in mot of his formulations until now, Lacan argued that '''there is a side to language which is itself a [[form]] of ''jouissance'''.  If language was traditionally seen as made up of [[signifier]]s, each of which was linked to [[another]] [[signifier]], he now proposed that there was a [[signifier]] without such [[links]]... a One, which makes up "[[lalangue]]", an amalgam of [[libido]] and [[signifier]]s.
  
 +
[[Language]] is now shown to have not only effects of [[meaning]] and [[signification]], but direct effects of ''[[jouissance]]''.  These [[ideas]] complicated the received [[notion]] that the [[libido]] and ''[[jouissance]]'' were different in [[nature]] from [[linguistic]] elements.
  
 
{{Encore}} pp. 44, 84, 101, 106, 132, 138-39, 141-42, 143
 
{{Encore}} pp. 44, 84, 101, 106, 132, 138-39, 141-42, 143
 +
 +
{{OK}}

Latest revision as of 20:06, 25 May 2019

In the early 1970s, Lacan turned his attention more and more to the place of jouissance in human sexuality, the field he had discussed with such subtety in the late 1950s with the theoretical tools of desire and the phallus. Whereas language and jouissance had remained distinct in mot of his formulations until now, Lacan argued that there is a side to language which is itself a form of jouissance. If language was traditionally seen as made up of signifiers, each of which was linked to another signifier, he now proposed that there was a signifier without such links... a One, which makes up "lalangue", an amalgam of libido and signifiers.

Language is now shown to have not only effects of meaning and signification, but direct effects of jouissance. These ideas complicated the received notion that the libido and jouissance were different in nature from linguistic elements.

Index