24,656
edits
Changes
no edit summary
==Introduction==
[[Žižek]]'s account of [[law]] is built upon the reiteration of the idea that ''[[law]] is [[split]]'' or that ''there is a [[parallax view|parallax]] [[gap]] between the '''[[public]] [[letter]]''' and its '''[[obscene]] [[superego]] [[supplement]]'''''.<ref>{{Z}} ''[[The Parallax View]]''. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. p. 10.</ref>
(This chapter focuses on the split in law, drawing out its repercussions for thinking about law more generally.)
For [[Žižek]], ''[[law]] is '''necessary''' and potentially '''liberatory'''''.
Appearing in mutiple arrangements - the [[symbolic]] [[law]] of [[language]] and [[law|norms]], the [[public]] [[law]] of [[state]]s and [[state|regimes]], the [[transgressive]] "[[obscene|nightly]]" [[law]] of [[superego]], as well as the [[religion|religious]] [[law]] of [[Judaism]] and the [[Pauline]] [[law]] of [[faith]] - [[law]] persists as a constituent element of human practical experience.
Yet ''[[law]] as such is [[lack|incomplete]]''.
==Law's Founding==
===Founding Crime===
===Founding Law===
==Split Law==
===Surplus===
===Lack===
==Enjoying Law==
===Love With Law===
===The Object in Law: From Superego to Objet Petit a===
===Attachment to Law: From Enjoyment Through Duty to Enjoyment in Love===
==Conclusion: Hope in Law==
==Notes==
<references/>
