Changes

How does [[violence]] ''persist'' in [[law]], and what is its relation to '''[[law|split law]]'''? =====Introduction==Surplus=== As a non-integrated, [[surplus]],  [[ŽižekViolence]]'s account 'persists'' in the [[form]] of [[law]] is built upon as an ''[[injunction]]''. [[Violence]] gives [[law]] the reiteration form of the idea that an ''[[injunction]]''.  As a nonintegrated [[surplus]], [[violence]] gives [[law]] is the form of an ''[[splitinjunction]]'' or , rendering [[law]] as that which is to be obeyed. '''Law'''there is a constitutively senseless: it is obeyed not because it is [[good]], just, or beneficial, but because it is [[parallax view|parallaxlaw]] . As [[gapZizek]] between explains, "The last foundation of the [[Law]]'''s [[authority]] lies in its [[process]] of [[enunciation]]."<ref>{{Z}} "How Did [[publicMarx]] Invent the [[letterSymptom]]?" in ''' and its '[[Mapping Ideology]]''. Ed. [[Slavoj Zizek]]. Verso: [[London]], 1944. p. 318</ref> This [[traumatic]], nonintegrated [[character]] of [[obscenelaw]] is a positive condition of [[superegolaw]] .<ref>{{Z}} "How Did Marx Invent [[supplementthe Symptom]]?" in ''[[Mapping Ideology]]'''. Ed. Slavoj Zizek. Verso: London, 1944. p. 319</ref> This [[trauma]]tic, [[senseless]] [[injunction]] is also the [[psychoanalytic]] [[notion]] of the [[superego]]. [[Superego]] issues unconditional commands, telling us what to do, refusing to take no for an answer, refusing even to consider our specific circumstances, [[needs]] or desires.