From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Introduction==
| |
| − | [[Žižek]]'s account of [[law]] is built upon the reiteration of the idea that ''[[law]] is [[split]]'' or that ''there is a [[parallax view|parallax]] [[gap]] between the '''[[public]] [[letter]]''' and its '''[[obscene]] [[superego]] [[supplement]]'''''.<ref>{{Z}} ''[[The Parallax View]]''. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. p. 10.</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | (This chapter focuses on the split in law, drawing out its repercussions for thinking about law more generally.)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For [[Žižek]], ''[[law]] is '''necessary''' and potentially '''liberatory'''''.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Appearing in mutiple arrangements - the [[symbolic]] [[law]] of [[language]] and [[law|norms]], the [[public]] [[law]] of [[state]]s and [[state|regimes]], the [[transgressive]] "[[obscene|nightly]]" [[law]] of [[superego]], as well as the [[religion|religious]] [[law]] of [[Judaism]] and the [[Pauline]] [[law]] of [[faith]] - [[law]] persists as a constituent element of human practical experience.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Yet ''[[law]] as such is [[lack|incomplete]]''.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | ====Law's Founding==== | | ====Law's Founding==== |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Founding Crime=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Founding Law=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Split Law==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Surplus=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Lack=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Enjoying Law==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ====Love With Law====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====The Object in Law: From Superego to Objet Petit a=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =====Attachment to Law: From Enjoyment Through Duty to Enjoyment in Love=====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Conclusion: Hope in Law==
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | ==Notes==
| |
| | | | |
| − | <references/>
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Revision as of 01:46, 11 September 2006
