Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Love

82 bytes removed, 13:49, 12 November 2006
no edit summary
{{Top}}amour{{Bottom}}
==SpeechJacques Lacan=====Symbolic===
[[Lacan]] argues that it is [[impossible]] to [[speech|say]] anything [[meaning]]ful or [[meaning|sensible]] about [[love]].<ref>{{S8}} p. 57</ref> Indeed, the moment one starts to [[speech|speak]] about [[love]], one descends into imbecility.<ref>{{S20}} p. 17</ref> Given these views, it might seem surprising that [[Lacan]] himself dedicates a great deal of his [[seminar]] precisely to [[speech|speaking]] about [[love]]. However, in doing so, [[Lacan]] is merely demonstrating what the [[analysand]] does in [[psychoanalytic treatment]], for "the only thing that we do in the [[analytic discourse]] is [[speech|speak]] about [[love]]."<ref>{{S20}} p. 77</ref>
==Symbolic Effects=Imaginary===[[Love]] is located by [[Lacan]] as a purely [[imaginary]] phenomenon, although it has effects in the [[symbolic]] [[order]].<ref>(one of those effects being to produce "a veritable subduction of the symbolic") {{S1}} p. 142</ref> [[Love]] is [[autoeroticism|autoerotic]], and has a fundamentally [[narcissism|narcissistic]] [[structure]] since "it's one's own ego that one loves in love, one's own ego made real on the imaginary level."<ref>{{S1}} p. 142</ref> The [[imaginary]] nature of [[love]] leads [[Lacan]] to oppose all those [[analyst]]s who posit [[love]] as an ideal in [[psychoanalytic treatment]].<ref>{{S7}} p. 8</ref>
==Autoeroticism and Narcissism==[[Love]] involves an [[imaginary]] reciprocity, since "to love is , essentially, to wish to be loved."<ref>{{S11}} p. 253</ref> It is this reciprocity between "loving" and "being loved" that constitutes the illusion of [[autoeroticism|autoeroticlove]], and has a fundamentally this is what distinguishes it from the [[narcissism|narcissisticorder]] of the [[structuredrive]] since "it's one's own ego that one loves , in lovewhich there is no reciprocity, one's own ego made real on the imaginary levelonly pure activity."<ref>{{S1S11}} p.142200</ref>
==Psychoanalytic Treatment==The [[imaginaryLove]] nature of is an illusory [[lovefantasy]] leads of fusion with the beloved which makes up for the [[Lacanabsence]] to oppose all those of any [[analystsexual relationship]]s who posit .<ref>{{S20}} p. 44</ref> This is especially clear in the asexual concept of [[courtly love]] as an ideal in [[psychoanalytic treatment]].<ref>{{S7S20}} p.865</ref>
==Imaginary Reciprocity==[[Love]] involves an is [[imaginarytruth|deceptive]] reciprocity. "As a specular mirage, since love is essentially deception."<ref>{{S11}} p. 268</ref> It is [[lure|deceptive]] because it involves giving what one does not have (i.e. the [[phallus]]); to [[love ]] is, essentially, "to wish to be lovedgive what one does not have."<ref>{{S11S8}} p. 253147</ref>
It [[Love]] is this reciprocity between "loving" and "being loved" that constitutes directed not at what the illusion of [[love]]-[[object]] has, and this is but at what distinguishes it from he [[lack]]s, at the nothing beyond him. The [[orderobject]] is valued insofar as it comes in the place of the that [[drivelack]]s, in which there is no reciprocity, only pure activity.<ref>{{S11}} p. 200</ref>
==Illusory Fantasy=Love and Desire===One of the most complex areas of [[LoveLacan]] is an illusory 's [[fantasyJacques Lacan:Bibliography|work]] of fusion with the beloved which makes up for concerns the relationship between [[absencelove]] of any and [[sexual relationshipdesire]].<ref>{{S20}} p On the one hand, the two terms are diametrically opposed. 44</ref> On the other hand, this opposition is problematized by certain similarities between the two:
This ====Opposition: Love and Desire====As an [[imaginary]] phenomenon which belongs to the [[order|field]] of the [[ego]], [[love]] is especially clear clearly opposed to [[desire]], which is inscribed in the asexual concept [[symbolic]] [[order]], the [[order|field]] of the [[Other]].<ref>{{S11}} pp. 189-91</ref> [[Love]] is a [[metaphor]], whereas [[desire]] is [[metonymy]].<ref>{{S8}} p. 53</ref> It can even be said that [[love]] kills [[desire]], since [[courtly love]] is based on a [[fantasy]] of oneness with the beloved and this abolishes the difference which gives rise to [[desire]].<ref>{{S20}} p. 6546</ref>
==Deception and Lack==[[Love]] is [[truth|deceptive]]. <blockquote>"As a specular mirage, love is essentially deception."<ref>{{S11}} p. 268</ref></blockquote> It is [[lure|deceptive]] because it involves giving what one does not have (i.e. the [[phallus]]); to [[love]] is "to give what one does not have."<ref>{{S8}} p. 147</ref> [[Love]] is directed not at what the [[love]]-[[object]] has, but at what he [[lack]]s, at the nothing beyond him. The [[object]] is valued insofar as it comes in the place of that [[lack]]. ==Love and Desire==One of the most complex areas of [[Lacan]]'s work concerns the relationship between [[love]] and [[desire]]. On the one hand, the two terms are diametrically opposed. On the other hand, this opposition is problematized by certian similarities between the two: ===OppositionSimilarity: Love and Desire===As an [[imaginary]] phenomenon which belongs to the field of the [[ego]], [[love]] is clearly opposed to [[desire]], which is inscribed in the [[symbolic]] [[order]], the field of the [[Other]].<ref>{{S11}} p.189-91</ref> [[Love]] is a [[metaphor]], whereas [[desire]] is [[metonymy]].<ref>{{S8}} p. 53</ref> It can even be said that [[love]] kills [[desire]], since [[love]] is based on a [[fantasy]] of oneness with the beloved and this abolishes the difference which gives rise to [[desire]].<ref>{{S20}} p. 46</ref> ===Similarity: Love and Desire===
On the other hand, there are elements in [[Lacan]]'s work which destabilize the neat opposition between [[love]] and [[desire]].
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu