Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Metalanguage

363 bytes removed, 06:58, 18 August 2006
no edit summary
A ': [[metalanguageFr]]. '' is a [[linguisticmétalangage]] term for a type of [[language]] that can be used to describe (or analyze) (the properties of) another [[language]] (or [[symbolic]] [[system]]).''
=====Linguistic Definition====="[[Metalanguage]]" is the technical term in [[linguistics]] for any form of [[language]] which is used to describe or analyze the properties of another [[language]].
=====Roman Jakobson=====[[Roman Jakobson]] includes the metalingual function in his list of the functions of [[language]].<ref>[[Roman Jakobson|Jakobson, Roman]]. (1960) "Linguistics and poetics," in ''Selected Writings'', vol. II, ''Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry'', The Hague:Mouton, 1981, p.25</ref>
((More generally, any descriptive [[discourse]] such as [[literary criticism]] can be said to function as a [[metalanguage]].)) =====Jacques Lacan==========Early Work=====
[[Lacan]]'s first reference to [[metalanguage]] comes in 1956, when he echoes [[Jakobson]]'s view on the metalingual function of all [[language]]:
<blockquote>"All [[language]] implies a [[metalanguage]], its already a [[metalanguage]] of its own register."<ref>{{S3}} p. 226</ref></blockquote>
In 1956 [[Jacques Lacan]] reaffirms [[Jakobson]]'s view on the metalingual function of all [[language]]: "all [[language]] implies a [[metalanguage]], its already a [[metalanguage]] of its own register."<ref>{{S3}} p. 226</ref> =====Later Work=====
A few years later, in 1960, he says precisely the opposite, arguing that "no [[metalanguage]] can be spoken."<ref>{{E}} p.311</ref>
However, in 1960, [[Lacan]] states the opposite, arguing that "no [[metalanguage]] can be spoken."<ref>{{E}} p.311</ref> What [[Lacan]] appears to mean by this remark is that, since every attempt to fix the meaning of language must be done in language, there can be no escape from [[language]], no '"outside'".
This is reminiscent of Heidegger's views on the impossibility of exiting "the house of language."
If the Otheer is the guarantee of the coherence of the subject's discourse, then the falsity of this guarantee is revealed by the fact that the guarantor himself lacks such a guarantee.
 
 
In a clinical context, this means that there is no metalanguage of the transference, no point outside the transference from which it could be finally interpreted and "liquidated."
---     =More=
==Psychoanalytic Treatment==
In a [[clinical]] context, this means that there is no [[metalanguage]] of the [[transference]], no point [[outside]] the [[transference]] from which it could be finally [[interpreted]] and 'liquidated'.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
==See Also==
<references/>
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Postmodern theory]]
[[Category:Dictionary]]
[[Category:PoststructuralismLanguage]]
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:ConceptsOK]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]]__NOTOC__
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu