Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Mirror stage

1,913 bytes added, 19:31, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
Lacan's article "The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I" (1936, 1949) lays out the parameters of a doctrine that he never foreswore, and which has subsequently become something of a post-structuralist mantra: namely, that human identity is 'decentred'. The key observation of Lacan’s essay concerns the behaviour of infants between the ages of 6 and 18 months. At this age, Lacan notes, children become capable of recognising their mirror image. This is not a dispassionate experience, either. It is a recognition that brings the child great pleasure. For Lacan, we can only explain this 'jubilation' as a testimony to how, in the recognition of its mirror-image, the child is having its first anticipation of itself as a unified and separate individual. Before this time, Lacan contends (drawing on contemporary psychoanalytic observation), the child is little more than a 'body in bits and pieces', unable to clearly separate I and Other, and wholly dependant for its survival (for a length of time unique in the animal kingdom) upon its first nurturers.The implications of this observation on the mirror stage, in Lacan's reckoning, are far-reaching. They turn around the fact that, if it holds, then the genesis of individuals' sense of individuation can in no way be held to issue from the 'organic’ or 'natural' development of any inner wealth supposed to be innate within them. The I is an Other from the ground up, for Lacan (echoing and developing a conception of the ego already mapped out in Freud's Ego and Id). The truth of this dictum, as Lacan comments in "Aggressivity and Psychoanalysis", is evident in infantile transitivity: that phenomenon wherein one infant hit by another yet proclaims: 'I hit him!', and visa-versa. It is more simply registered in the fact that it remains a permanent possibility of adult human experience for us to speak and think of ourselves in the second or third person. What is decisive in these phenomena, according to Lacan, is that the ego is at base an object: an artificial projection of subjective unity modelled on the visual images of objects and others that the individual confronts in the world. Identification with the ego, Lacan accordingly maintains, is what underlies the unavoidable component of aggressivity in human behaviour especially evident amongst infants, and which Freud recognised in his Three Essays on Sexuality when he stressed the primordial ambivalence of children towards their love object(s) (in the oral phase, to love is to devour; in the anal phase, it is to master or destroy …).{{Top}}stade du miroir{{Bottom}}
==Jacques Lacan==
===History===
The [[concept]] of the [[mirror stage]] is [[Lacan]]'s first important contribution to [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic theory]], [[Lacan]]'s first innovation within the field of [[psychoanalysis]], propounded at an [[IPA]] conference at [[Marienbad]] in [[{{Y}}|1936]]. The concept is a constant point of reference throughout [[Lacan]]'s [[Jacques Lacan:Bibliography|work]], and becomes increasingly [[complex]] as it is reworked in various different contexts.
== def=Child Psychology===The young child's identification with his own image (what Lacan terms the "Ideal-I[[mirror stage|mirror test]]" or "ideal ego"), a stage that occurs anywhere from 6-18 months was first described by the [[French]] [[psychology|psychologist]] and friend of age. For [[Lacan]], this act marks the primordial recognition of one's self as "IHenri Wallon, in 1931," although at [[Lacan]] attributes its discovery to Baldwin.<ref>{{E}} p. 1</ref> It refers to a point before entrance into language and [[particular]] experiment which can differentiate the symbolic order. This stage's misrecognition or méconnaissance (seeing an ideal-I where there is a fragmented[[human]] [[infant]] from his closest [[animal]] relative, chaotic body) subsequently "characterizes the ego in all its structures" (Écrits 6)chimpanzee. In particular, this creation of an ideal version of the self gives pre The six-­month-verbal impetus to old child differs from the creation chimpanzee of narcissistic phantasies the same age in that the fully developed subject. That fantasy image of oneself can be filled former becomes fascinated with its [[reflection]] in by others who we may want to emulate in our adult lives (role models, et cetera), anyone that we set up as a mirror for ourselves. The the [[mirror stage establishes what Lacan terms the "imaginary order" ]] andjubilantly assumes it as its own [[image]], through whereas the imaginary, continues to assert its influence on chimpanzee quickly realizes that the subject even after the subject enters the symbolic order. See the Lacan Module on Psychosexual Development[[image]] is [[illusory]] and loses interest in it.
== def =Structure of Subjectivity===[[Lacan]]'s concept of the [[mirror stage]] represents a fundamental aspect of the [[structure]] of [[subjectivity]]. Whereas in [[{{Y}}|1936-49]], [[Lacan]] seems to see it is a [[development|stage]] which can be located at a specific [[time]] in the [[development]] of the [[child]] with a beginning (six months) and an end (eighteen months),<ref>{{E}} p. 5</ref> by the end of this period there are already [[signs]] that he is broadening the concept.
By the early 1950s [[Jacques Lacan]] tells of the '''mirror stage''' no longer regards it simply as a [[moment]] in his essay "The Mirror stage as formative of the function [[life]] of the ''I'' as revealed in psychoanalytic experience," which was published in English in ''Écrits: A Selection'', first by Alan Sheridan in 1977[[infant]], and more recently by Bruce Fink in 2002. Lacan first delivered this essay but sees it as also representing a talk at the 16th International Congress of Psychoanalysis in Zurich on July 17 1949. In permanent [[Jacques Lacanstructure]]'s of [[psychoanalyticsubjectivity]] theory, the "mirror stage" paradigm of the [[imaginary|imaginary order]]; it is a stadium (''le stade du miroir'') is in which the point in an [[infantsubject]]'s life when he may recognize his "is permanently [[self (philosophy)captation|selfcaught]]" in a mirror, and thus achieves [[consciousnesscaptation|captivated]] of himself.by his own [[image]]:
When the child sees itself in <blockquote>[the mirror, often propped up by another person or mechanical device and [[stage]] is able ] a phenomenon to associate which I assign a twofold [[value]]. In the image with itselffirst [[place]], it retroactively posits that before this autonomy that has historical value as it now perceives, its body was marks a decisive turning-point in "bits and piecesthe [[mental]] development of the child." At In the moment of perceiving bodily autonomysecond place, Jane Gallop says there is jubilation, but it is short livedtypifies an essential [[libidinal]] [[relationship]] with the [[body]]-image.<ref>{{L}} 1951b. As soon as "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|Some Reflections on the infant can posit that prior to this moment it was in Ego]],"bits and pieces''Int. J. [[Psycho]]-[[Anal]].''," it recognizes the danger of regressing to this earlier stagevol. 34, 1953: 14</ref></blockquote>
The potential relation between facets ===Dual Relationship===As Lacan further develops the concept of the [[mirror stage ]], the stress falls less on its "[[development|historical value]]" and our relation to character archetypes has been explored in depth by theorists of entertainment mediaever more on its [[structure|structural value]].
==See also==* Thus by 1956 [[Consciousness]]* [[Self-awareness]]* [[the ImaginaryLacan]]can say:
<blockquote>[[CategoryThe mirror stage]] is far from a mere phenomenon which occurs in the development of the child. It illustrates the conflictual [[nature]] of the [[dual]] relationship.<ref>{{S4}} p. 17</ref></blockquote>  ===Ego Formation===The [[mirror stage]] describes the [[formation]] of the [[ego]] via the [[process]] of [[identification]]; the [[ego]] is the result of [[identifying]] with one's own [[specular image]].  ===Prematurity of Infant===The key to this phenomenon lies in the [[helplessness|prematurity]] of the [[human]] [[infant|baby]]: at six months, the baby still [[lacks]] coordination. However, its [[visual]] [[system]] is relatively advanced, which means that it can recognize itself in the mirror before attaining [[control]] over its [[bodily]] movements.  The [[baby]] sees its own [[image]] as [[gestalt|whole]], and the [[dialectic|synthesis]] of this [[image]] produces a [[sense]] of contrast with the uncoordination of the body, which is experienced as a [[fragmented body]]; this contrast is first felt by the [[infant]] as a [[rivalry]] with its own [[image]], because the [[gestalt|wholeness]] of the [[image]] threatens the subject with [[fragmentation]], and the [[mirror stage]] thereby gives rise to an [[aggressivity|aggressive tension]] between the [[subject]] and the [[specular image|image]].  In [[order]] to resolve this [[aggressivity|aggressive tension]], the [[subject]] [[identifies]] with the [[image]]; this [[identification|primary identi­fication]] with the [[counterpart]] is what forms the [[ego]]. The moment of [[identifica­tion]], when the [[subject]] assumes its [[image]] as its own, is described by [[Lacan]] as a moment of jubilation,<ref>{{E}} p. 1</ref> since it leads to an [[imaginary]] sense of [[master|mastery]]: <blockquote>[the child's] joy is due to his imaginary triumph in anticipating a degree of muscular co-ordination which he has not yet actually achieved.<ref>{{L}} 1951b. "[[Works of Jacques Lacan|Some Reflections on the Ego]]," ''Int. J. Psycho-Anal.'', Vol. 34, 1953:Human development15; {{S1}} p. 79</ref></blockquote>  However, this jubilation may also be accompanied by a depressive reaction, when the [[child]] compares his own precarious sense of [[mastery]] with the omnipotence of the [[mother]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 345; {{S4}} p. 186</ref> ===Ideal Ego===This [[identification]] also involves the [[ideal ego]] which functions as a promise of [[future]] [[gestalt|wholeness]] which sustains the [[ego]] in [[time|anticipation]]. The [[mirror stage]] shows that the [[ego]] is the product of [[méconnaissance|misunderstanding]] ([[méconnaissance]] and the site where the [[subject]] becomes [[alienation|alienated]] from himself. ===Imaginary and Symbolic===It represents the introduction of the [[subject]] into the [[imaginary order]]. However, the [[mirror stage]] also has an important [[symbolic|symbolic dimension]]. The [[symbolic order]] is [[present]] in the [[figure]] of the [[adult]] who is carrying or supporting the [[infant]].  The moment after the [[subject]] has jubilantly assumed his [[image]] as his own, he turns his head round towards this adult, who represents the [[big Other]], as if to call on him to ratify this [[image]].<ref>{{L}} ''[[Seminar X|Le Séminaire. Livre X. L'angoisse, 1962-3]]''. Unpublished. [[Seminar]]of 28 November 1962</ref> ===Narcissism===The [[mirror stage]] is also closely related to [[Categorynarcissism]], as the story of [[Narcissus]] clearly shows (in the Greek [[myth]], [[Narcissus]] falls in [[love]] with his own reflection).<ref>* "[[Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction du Je]]." ''[[Écrits]]''. [[Paris]]: Seuil, 1966: 93-100 ["[[The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I]]." Trans. [[Alan Sheridan]]. ''[[Écrits: A Selection]]''. [[London]]: Tavistock, 1977; New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1977:Psychoanalysis1-7].</ref> ==See Also=={{See}}* [[Aggressivity]]* [[Alienation]]* [[Biology]]||* [[Captation]]* [[Ego]]* [[Gestalt]]||* [[Ideal ego]]* [[Identification]]* [[Imaginary]]||* [[Master]]* [[Narcissism]]* [[Other]]||* [[Psychology]]* [[Specular image]]{{Also}} ==References==<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small"><references/></div> {{OK}}[[Category:Philosophical terminologyImaginary]][[Category:LacanDevelopment]] __NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu