Difference between revisions of "Neurosis"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The term "[[neurosis]]" ([[Fr]]. ''[[névrose]]'') is originally a [[psychiatric]] term which came to denote, in the eighteen-century, a whole range of nervous disorders defined by a wide variety of [[symptom]]s.
  
The term '[[neurosis]]' (''[[névrose]]'') is used in [[psychoanalysis]] to describe a number of nervous disorders.
+
[[Freud]] uses the term in a number of ways, sometimes as a general term for all mental disorders in his early work, and sometimes to denote a specific class of mental disorders (i.e. in opposiiton to [[psychosis]]).
  
==Jacques Lacan==
+
--
  
For [[Lacan]], the term '[[neurosis]]' refers not to a set of (behavioral or psychosomatic) [[symptoms]] but to a particular [[clinical structure]].
+
In [[Lacan]]'s work, the term [[neurosis]] always figures in opposition to [[psychosis]] and [[perversion]], and refers not to a set of [[symptom]]s but to a particular [[clinical structure]].
  
[[Lacan]] identifies three [[clinical structure]]s:
+
This use of the term to designate a [[structure]] problematizes [[Freud]]'s distinction between [[neurosis]] and normality.
* [[neurosis]],
 
* [[psychosis]] and
 
* [[perversion]].
 
  
==Psychoanalytic Treatment==
+
[[Freud]] bases this distinction purely on a quantitative factors ("psychoanalytic research finds no fundamental but only quantitative distinction between normal and neurotic life"<ref>Freud. 1990a: SE V, 373</ref>), which is not a [[structural]] distinction.
  
[[Freud]] argued that [[neurosis]] was an illness that could be [[cure]]d.
+
In [[structural]] terms, therefore, there is no distinction between the normal [[subject]] and the [[neurotic]].
  
[[Lacan]] argues that 'mental health' is an illusory idea of wholeness which can never be attained because the [[subject]] is essentially [[split]].
+
This [[Lacanian]] nosology identifies three [[clinical structures]]: [[neurosis]], [[psychosis]] and [[perversion]], in which there is no position of "mental health" which could be called normal.<ref>{{S8}} p.374-5; {{E}} p.163</ref>
  
The [[aim]] of [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic]] [[treatment]] is not the eradication of the [[neurosis]] but the modification of the [[subject]]'s position ''vis-a-vis'' the [[neurosis]].
+
The normal [[structure]], in the sense of that which is found in the statistical majority of the population, is [[neurosis]], and "mental health" is an illusory ideal of wholeness which can never be attained because the [[subject]] is essentially [[split]].
 +
 
 +
THus whereas [[Freud]] sees [[neurosis]] as an illness that can be cured, [[Lacan]] sees [[neurosis]] as a [[structure]] that cannot be altered.
 +
 
 +
The aim of [[psychoanalytic treatment]] is therefore not the eradication of the [[neurosis]] but the modification of the [[subject]]'s position ''vis-à-vis'' the [[neurosis]].
 +
 
 +
--
  
==The Question==
 
 
According to [[Lacan]], "the structure of a neurosis is essentially a question."<ref>{{S3}} p.174</ref>
 
According to [[Lacan]], "the structure of a neurosis is essentially a question."<ref>{{S3}} p.174</ref>
  
Line 26: Line 29:
 
The two forms of [[neurosis]] ([[hysteria]] and [[obsessional neurosis]]) are distinguished by the content of the question.
 
The two forms of [[neurosis]] ([[hysteria]] and [[obsessional neurosis]]) are distinguished by the content of the question.
  
The question of the [[hysteria|hysteric]] ('Am I a [[man]] or a [[woman]]?') relates to one's [[sex]], whereas the question of [[obsessional neurosis]] ('To be or not to be?') relates to the contingency of one's own [[existence]].
+
The question of the [[hysteric]] ("Am I a man or a woman?") relates to one's sex, whereas the question of the [[obsessional neurosis]] ("To be or not to be?") relates to the contingency of one's own [[existence]].
 +
 
 +
These two questions (the hysterical question about sexual identity, and the obsessional question about death/existence) "are as it happens the two ultimate questions that have precisely no solution in the signifier.  This is what gives neurotics this existential value."<ref>{{S3}} p.190</ref>>
 +
 
 +
--
  
These two questions (the [[hysteria|hysterical]] question about [[sexual identity]], and the [[obsessional neurosis|obsessional]] question about [[death]]/[[existence]]) "are as it happens the two ultimate questions that have precisely no solution in the signifier. This is what gives neurotics their existential values.<ref>{{S3}} p.190</ref>
+
At times [[Lacan]] lists [[phobia]] as a [[neurosis]] alongside [[hysteria]] and [[obsessional neurosis]], thus raising the question of whether there are not two but three forms of [[neurosis]].<ref>{{E}} p.168</ref>
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
* [[Hysteria]]
 
* [[Hysteria]]
 
* [[Obsessional neurosis]]
 
* [[Obsessional neurosis]]
* [[phobia]]
+
* [[Phobia]]
* [[structure]]
+
* [[Structure]]
* [[symptom]]
+
* [[Symptom]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[Category:Neurosis]]
+
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 
[[Category:Treatment]]
 
[[Category:Treatment]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]

Revision as of 19:59, 30 July 2006

The term "neurosis" (Fr. névrose) is originally a psychiatric term which came to denote, in the eighteen-century, a whole range of nervous disorders defined by a wide variety of symptoms.

Freud uses the term in a number of ways, sometimes as a general term for all mental disorders in his early work, and sometimes to denote a specific class of mental disorders (i.e. in opposiiton to psychosis).

--

In Lacan's work, the term neurosis always figures in opposition to psychosis and perversion, and refers not to a set of symptoms but to a particular clinical structure.

This use of the term to designate a structure problematizes Freud's distinction between neurosis and normality.

Freud bases this distinction purely on a quantitative factors ("psychoanalytic research finds no fundamental but only quantitative distinction between normal and neurotic life"[1]), which is not a structural distinction.

In structural terms, therefore, there is no distinction between the normal subject and the neurotic.

This Lacanian nosology identifies three clinical structures: neurosis, psychosis and perversion, in which there is no position of "mental health" which could be called normal.[2]

The normal structure, in the sense of that which is found in the statistical majority of the population, is neurosis, and "mental health" is an illusory ideal of wholeness which can never be attained because the subject is essentially split.

THus whereas Freud sees neurosis as an illness that can be cured, Lacan sees neurosis as a structure that cannot be altered.

The aim of psychoanalytic treatment is therefore not the eradication of the neurosis but the modification of the subject's position vis-à-vis the neurosis.

--

According to Lacan, "the structure of a neurosis is essentially a question."[3]

Neurosis "is a question that being poses for the subject."[4]

The two forms of neurosis (hysteria and obsessional neurosis) are distinguished by the content of the question.

The question of the hysteric ("Am I a man or a woman?") relates to one's sex, whereas the question of the obsessional neurosis ("To be or not to be?") relates to the contingency of one's own existence.

These two questions (the hysterical question about sexual identity, and the obsessional question about death/existence) "are as it happens the two ultimate questions that have precisely no solution in the signifier. This is what gives neurotics this existential value."[5]>

--

At times Lacan lists phobia as a neurosis alongside hysteria and obsessional neurosis, thus raising the question of whether there are not two but three forms of neurosis.[6]

See Also

References

  1. Freud. 1990a: SE V, 373
  2. Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre VIII. Le transfert, 1960-61. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.374-5; Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.163
  3. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.174
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.168
  5. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.190
  6. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.168