Changes

=====Jacques Lacan==========The Tree Three Orders=====Although [[Lacan]] uses the [[terms ]] "[[real]]," "[[symbolic]]" and "[[imaginary]]" from early on in his work, it is not until 1953 that he speaks of these as [[three ]] "[[order]]s" or three "[[order|register]]s.")From that [[moment]] on they come to be the fundamental classification [[system]] around which all his theorizing turns. This classification system allows important distinctions to be drawn between [[concepts]] which, according to [[Lacan]], had previously been confused in [[psychoanalytic theory]].

From ===Psychoanalytic Theory===For example [[Lacan]] argues that moment on they come much misunderstanding has arisen in [[psychoanalytic theory]] due to a failure to be distinguish between the fundamental [[imaginary]] [[father]], the [[symbolic]] [[father]] and the [[real]] [[father]]. Thus [[Lacan]] claims that his [[tripartite]] classification system around which all his theorizing turns.has shed invaluable light on [[Freud]]'s [[work]]:

The <blockquote>"Without these three systems to [[imaginaryguide]]ourselves by, the it would be [[symbolicimpossible]] and the to [[realunderstand]] thus comprise a basic classification system (around which all [[Lacan]]'s theorizing turns) which allows important distinctions to be drawn between concepts which, according to anything of the [[LacanFreudian]], had previously been confused in [[psychoanalytic theorytechnique]]and experience."<ref>{{S1}} p. 73</ref></blockquote>

=====Psychoanalytic Theory==Distinction===For example The [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]] are profoundly heterogeneous, each referring to quite distinct aspects of [[psychoanalytic]] [[experience]]. It is therefore difficult to see what they have in common, and yet, the fact that [[Lacan]] argues refers to all three as "[[order]]s" implies that much misunderstanding has arisen they share some common property. [[Lacan]] explores this question of what the three [[order]]s have in common by means of the [[psychoanalytic theorytopology]] due to a failure to distinguish between of the [[imaginaryBorromean knot]] in his 1974-5 [[fatherseminar]], [[RSI]]. They are not [[mental]] forces like the three [[symbolicagency|agencies]] in [[Freud]] 's [[fatherstructural model]] . However, they are primarily concerned with mental functioning, and together they cover the [[realwhole]] field of [[fatherpsychoanalysis]].

Thus [[Lacan]] claims that his tripartite classification system has shed invaluable light on [[Freud]]'s [[work]]:  <blockquote>"Without these three systems to guide ourselves by, it would be impossible to understand anything of the Freudian technique and experience."<ref>{{S1}} p. 73</ref></blockquote> =====Distinction=====The [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]] are profoundly heterogeneous, each referring to quite distinct aspects of [[psychoanalytic]] [[experience]].  It is therefore difficult to see what they have in common, and yet, the fact that [[Lacan]] refers to all three as "[[order]]s" implies that they share some common property.  [[Lacan]] explores this question of what the three [[order]]s have in common by means of the [[topology]] of the [[Borromean knot]] in his 1974-5 [[seminar]], [[RSI]].  They are not mental forces like the three [[agency|agencies]] in [[Freud]]'s [[structural model]].  However, they are primarily concerned with mental functioning, and together they cover the whole field of [[psychoanalysis]]. =====Interdependence=====Although the three [[orders]] are profoundly heterogeneous, each order must be defined by reference to the [[other ]] two.  The [[structural]] interdependence of the three [[order]]s is illustrated by the [[Borromean knot]], in which the severing of any one of the three rings causes the other two to become separated also.<!-- =====More=====It should also be noted that the "orders" are not [[stable]] concepts; at each moment each may be implicated in the redefinition of the [[others]].-->