Difference between revisions of "Reality Principle"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
  
Together with the [[pleasure principle]], the [[reality principle]] is, according to [[Freud]], one of the two principles governing the workings of the [[psyche]].
 
The [[reality principle]] modifies the [[pleasure principle]] by regulating the instinctive search for [[pleasure]].
 
Under its influence, the search for [[pleasure]] ceases to be immediate as momentary and uncertain pleasures are renounced in order to gain a more assured [[pleasure]] at a later stage (deferred gratification).
 
The quest for [[pleasure]] is thus modified so as to make it conform to the conditions imposed by external realities.
 
The religious doctrine which holds that those who renounce earthly pleasures can expect to be rewarded in the afterlife is viewed by [[Freud] as a [[projection]] of the [[reality principle]].
 
  
  
 +
According to [{Freud]], the [[psyche]] is at first regulated entirely by the [[pleasure principle]].
  
 +
The [[pleasure principle]] seeks to experience [[satisfaction]] via [[hallucination|hallucinatory]] [[cathexis]] of a [[memory]] of prior [[satisfaction]].
  
  
 +
However, the [[subject]] soon discovers that [[hallucination|hallucinating]] does not fully [[satisfaction|satisfy]] his [[need]]s, and is thus forced "to form a conception of the real circumstances in the external world."<ref>Freud, 1911b: SE XII, 219</ref>
  
 +
[[Freud]] introduces the [[reality principle]] (''principe de rèalitè''), a new 'principle of mental functioning' which modifies the [[pleasure principle]] and forces the [[subject]] to take more circuitous routes to [[satisfaction]].
  
[[Real]]ity principle (principe de rÈalitÈ) According to Freud, the
+
Since, however, the ultimate aim of the [[reality principle]] is still the [[satisfaction]] of the [[drive]]s.
  
psyche is at first regulated entirely by the PLEASURE PRINCIPLE, Which seeks to
+
[[Lacan]] is opposed to what he calls "a naive conception of the Reality principle."<ref>1951b: ll</ref>
  
experience satisfaction via a hallucinatory cathexis of a memory of prior
+
He rejects any account of [[human]] [[development]] based on an unproblematic notion of '[[reality]]' as an [[objective]] and self-evident given.
  
satisfaction. However, the subject soon discovers that hallucinating does not
+
[[Lacan]] (following [[Freud]]) argues that the [[reality principle]] is still ultimately in the service of the [[pleasure principle]]: "the reality principle is a delayed action pleasure principle."<ref>{{S2}} p.60</ref>
  
relieve his needs, and is thus forced 'to form                a conception of the [[Real]]
+
[[Lacan]] thus challenges the idea that the [[subject]] has access to an infallible means of distinguishing between [[reality]] and [[fantasy]].
  
circumstances in the external world' (Freud, 1911b: SE XII, 219). A new
+
"Reality isn't just there so that we bump our heads up against the false paths along which the functioning of the pleasure principle leads us. In truth, we make reality out of pleasure."<ref>{{S7}} p.225</ref>
  
'principle of mental functioning' is thus introduced (the '[[Real]]ity principle'),
+
Together with the [[pleasure principle]], the [[reality principle]] is, according to [[Freud]], one of the two principles governing the workings of the [[psyche]].
 
 
which modifies the pleasure principle and forces the subject to take              more
 
 
 
circuitous routes to satisfaction. Since, however, the ultimate aim of the
 
 
 
[[Real]]ity principle is still the satisfaction of the drives, it can be said that 'the
 
 
 
substitution of the [[Real]]ity principle for the pleasure principle implies                no
 
 
 
deposing of the pleasure principle, but only            a safeguarding of it' (Freud,
 
 
 
1911b: SE XII, 223).
 
 
 
      From early on, Lacan is opposed to what he calls 'a naive conception of the
 
 
 
[[Real]]ity principle' (1951b: ll). That is, he rejects any account of human
 
 
 
development based on an unproblematic notion of '[[Real]]ity'          as an objective
 
 
 
and self-evident given. He emphasises Freud's position that the [[Real]]ity prin-
 
 
 
ciple is still ultimately in the service of the pleasure principle; 'the [[Real]]ity
 
 
 
principle is a delayed action pleasure principle' (S2, 60). Lacan thus chal-
 
 
 
lenges the idea that the subject has access to an infallible means of distinguish-
 
  
ing between [[Real]]ity and [[Fantasy]]. '[R]eality isn't just there so that we bump our
+
The [[reality principle]] modifies the [[pleasure principle]] by regulating the [[instinct]]ive search for [[pleasure]].
  
heads up against the false paths along which the functioning of the pleasure
+
Under its influence, the search for [[pleasure]] ceases to be immediate as momentary and uncertain [[pleasure]]s are renounced in order to gain a more assured [[pleasure]] at a later [[stage]] (deferred gratification).
  
principle leads us. In truth, we make [[Real]]ity out of pleasure' (S7, 225).
+
The quest for [[pleasure]] is thus modified so as to make it conform to the conditions imposed by [[external]] [[realities]].
 +
The [[religious]] doctrine which holds that those who renounce earthly [[pleasure]]s can expect to be rewarded in the afterlife is viewed by [[Freud] as a [[projection]] of the [[reality principle]].
  
 +
Respectively, the [[desire]] for immediate gratification vs. the [[deferral]] of that gratification.
 +
Quite simply, the [[pleasure principle]] drives one to seek [[pleasure]] and to avoid [[pain]].
 +
However, as one grows up, one begins to learn the need sometimes to endure [[pain]] and to defer gratification because of the exigencies and obstacles of [[reality]]:
  
== def ==
+
"An ego thus educated has become 'reasonable'; it no longer lets itself be governed by the pleasure principle, but obeys the reality principle, which also at bottom seeks to obtain pleasure, but pleasure which is assured through taking account of reality, even though it is pleasure postponed and diminished."<ref>Introductory Lectures 16.357</ref>
Respectively, the desire for immediate gratification vs. the deferral of that gratification. Quite simply, the pleasure-principle drives one to seek pleasure and to avoid pain. However, as one grows up, one begins to learn the need sometimes to endure pain and to defer gratification because of the exigencies and obstacles of reality: "An ego thus educated has become 'reasonable'; it no longer lets itself be governed by the pleasure principle, but obeys the reality principle, which also at bottom seeks to obtain pleasure, but pleasure which is assured through taking account of reality, even though it is pleasure postponed and diminished" (Introductory Lectures 16.357).
 
  
 +
==See Also==
 +
* [[Pleasure principle]]
 +
* [[pleasure]]
 +
* [[desire]]
 +
* ''[[jouissance]]''
 +
* [[reality]]
  
  
Line 67: Line 49:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[Category:Lacan]]
+
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Freudian psychology]]
 +
[[Category:Real]]
 +
[[Category:Symbolic]]

Revision as of 12:46, 21 June 2006


According to [{Freud]], the psyche is at first regulated entirely by the pleasure principle.

The pleasure principle seeks to experience satisfaction via hallucinatory cathexis of a memory of prior satisfaction.


However, the subject soon discovers that hallucinating does not fully satisfy his needs, and is thus forced "to form a conception of the real circumstances in the external world."[1]

Freud introduces the reality principle (principe de rèalitè), a new 'principle of mental functioning' which modifies the pleasure principle and forces the subject to take more circuitous routes to satisfaction.

Since, however, the ultimate aim of the reality principle is still the satisfaction of the drives.

Lacan is opposed to what he calls "a naive conception of the Reality principle."[2]

He rejects any account of human development based on an unproblematic notion of 'reality' as an objective and self-evident given.

Lacan (following Freud) argues that the reality principle is still ultimately in the service of the pleasure principle: "the reality principle is a delayed action pleasure principle."[3]

Lacan thus challenges the idea that the subject has access to an infallible means of distinguishing between reality and fantasy.

"Reality isn't just there so that we bump our heads up against the false paths along which the functioning of the pleasure principle leads us. In truth, we make reality out of pleasure."[4]

Together with the pleasure principle, the reality principle is, according to Freud, one of the two principles governing the workings of the psyche.

The reality principle modifies the pleasure principle by regulating the instinctive search for pleasure.

Under its influence, the search for pleasure ceases to be immediate as momentary and uncertain pleasures are renounced in order to gain a more assured pleasure at a later stage (deferred gratification).

The quest for pleasure is thus modified so as to make it conform to the conditions imposed by external realities. The religious doctrine which holds that those who renounce earthly pleasures can expect to be rewarded in the afterlife is viewed by [[Freud] as a projection of the reality principle.

Respectively, the desire for immediate gratification vs. the deferral of that gratification. Quite simply, the pleasure principle drives one to seek pleasure and to avoid pain. However, as one grows up, one begins to learn the need sometimes to endure pain and to defer gratification because of the exigencies and obstacles of reality:

"An ego thus educated has become 'reasonable'; it no longer lets itself be governed by the pleasure principle, but obeys the reality principle, which also at bottom seeks to obtain pleasure, but pleasure which is assured through taking account of reality, even though it is pleasure postponed and diminished."[5]

See Also


References

  1. Freud, 1911b: SE XII, 219
  2. 1951b: ll
  3. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p.60
  4. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p.225
  5. Introductory Lectures 16.357