Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Return to Freud

6,606 bytes added, 22:15, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
{{Top}}retour à Freud{{Bottom}}
== ''Retour à Freud'' ===Overview=====
[[Psychoanalysis]] was founded by [[Sigmund Freud]]
The whole of [[Lacan]]'s work can only be understood within the context of the intellectual and theoretical legacy of [[Sigmund Freud]], the founder of [[psychoanalysis]].
67Psychoanalysis originates with the work of Freud and remains rooted in his theories to this day, but every generation of [[analysts]] that came after Freud has sought to update and correct those theories, and to resolve the contradictions that he [[left]] behind. Lacan argued that through this [[process]] of continual revision psychoanalysis had lost [[sight]] of its original aims; that it had become [[conservative]] and reactionary. By playing down the more uncomfortable and disturbing aspects of the [[theory]], especially the underlying [[presence]] of [[repressed]], [[unconscious]], [[desire]] in our [[mental]] lives, psychoanalysis had made itself respectable but it had lost its radical edge. In the early 1950s, therefore, Lacan famously declared the [[necessity]] of a 'return to Freud', that is to say, a return to the [[texts]] of Freud himself and to a close [[reading]] and [[understanding]] of those texts. For the next 26 years he would engage in this [[project]] of close reading, and in the process would reconstitute the theory of psychoanalysis.  [[Lacan]] presented a distinctive [[interpretation|reading]] of [[psychoanalysis]]. In 1951, [[Lacan]] made his call for a "[[return to Freud]]. =====Freudian Legacy=====The [[whole]] of [[Lacan]]'s work can only be [[understood]] within the context of the [[intellectual]] and [[theoretical]] legacy of [[Sigmund Freud]] (1856-81939), the founder [[father]] of [[psychoanalysis]]. [[Lacan]] first trained as a [[psychoanalyst]] within the [[International Psychoanalytical Association]] ([[IPA]]), the organization founded by [[Freud]] which presented itself as the sole legitimate heir to the ''[[Freudian]] legacy''. =====Betrayal of Freud=====However, [[Lacan]] gradually began to develop a radical critique of the way that most [[analyst]]s in the [[IPA]] had [[interpretation|interpreted]] [[Freud]]. After [[being]] expelled from the [[IPA]] in 1953, [[Lacan]] developed his polemic further, arguing that [[Freud]]'s radical insights had been universally betrayed by the [[school|three major schools]] of [[psychoanalysis]] within the [[IPA]]: [[ego-psychology]], [[Kleinian psychoanalysis]], and [[object-relations theory]]. =====Return to Freud=====To remedy this [[situation]], [[Lacan]] proposed to lead a "[[return to Freud]]", both in the [[sense]] of a renewed attention to the ''actual texts'' of [[Freud]] himself, and a '''return''' to the ''[[essence]]'' of [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]] which had been betrayed by the [[IPA]]. Reading [[Freud]] in the original [[German]] allowed [[Lacan]] to discover elements which had been obscured by poor [[translation]] and ignored by [[other]] commentators. =====Post-Freudians=====Thus much of [[Lacan]]'s work is taken up with detailed textual commentaries on specific works by [[Freud]], and by numerous references to the work of other analysts whose [[ideas]] [[Lacan]] refutes. To [[understand]] [[Lacan]]'s work, therefore, it is necessary both to have a detailed understanding of [[Freud]]'s ideas and also a grasp of the way these ideas were developed and modified by the other analysts (the 'post-Freudians') whom Lacan criticizes. These ideas are the background against which [[Lacan]] develops his own "[[return to Freud]]." <Blockquote>What such a return [to Freud] involves for me is not a [[return of the repressed]], but rather taking the antithesis constituted by the [[phase]] in the [[history]] of the [[psychoanalytic]] movement since the [[death]] of Freud, showing what psychoanalysis is not, and seeking with you the means of revitalizing that which has continued to sustain it, even in deviation...<ref>{{E}} p. 116</ref></Blockquote> =====Orthodoxy=====However, [[Lacan]]'s work itself puts in question the [[narrative]] of a '''return''' to ''orthodoxy'' implicit in the expression "[[return to Freud]]," for [[Lacan]]'s way of reading [[Freud]] and his style of presentation are so original that they seem to belie his modest claims to be a mere commentator. Furthermore, while it is [[true]] that [[Lacan]] returns to specific aspects of the [[Freud]]ian [[conceptual]] legacy, privileging [[Lacan]] is no more "faithful" to [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]] than the post-Freudians whom he criticizes for having betrayed [[Freud]]'s [[message]]; like [[them]], [[Lacan]] selects and develops certain themes in [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]] and neglects or [[interpretation|reinterprets]] [[others]]. '''[[Lacan]]ian [[psychoanalysis]]''' might therefore be described as a "[[Freud|post-Freudian]]" [[form]] of [[psychoanalysis]], along with '''[[ego-psychology]]''', '''[[Kleinian psychoanalysis]]''' and ''[[object-relations theory]]'''. =====Reading of Freud=====However, this is not the way [[Lacan]] sees his [[work]]. [[Lacan]] argues that there is a deeper [[logic]] at work in [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|texts]], a logic which endows those [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|texts]] with a consistency despite the [[apparent]] contradictions. [[Lacan]] claims that his [[interpretation|reading]] of [[Freud]], and his alone, brings out this logic, and shows us that "the different [[stages]] and changes in direction" in [[Freud]]'s [[Sigmund Freud:Bibliography|work]] "are governed by Freud's inflexibly effective concern to maintain it in its primary rigour."<ref>{{E}} p. 116</ref> In other [[words]], while [[Lacan]]'s reading of [[Freud]] may be as [[partial]] as any other in the sense that it privileges [[particular]] aspects of [[Freud]]'s work, that is not, in [[Lacan]]'s view, justification for regarding all [[interpretations]] of [[Freud]] as equally valid. Thus [[Lacan]]'s declarations of loyalty and accusations of '''[[betrayal]]''' cannot be seen as a mere rhetorical strategy. Certainly, they do have a rhetorico-[[political]] function, in that presenting himself as "more [[Freud]]ian" than anyone else allowed [[Lacan]] to challenge the effective monopoly on the ''[[Freud]]ian legacy'' that the [[IPA]] still enjoyed in the 1950s. However, [[Lacan]]'s statements are also an [[explicit]] [[claim]] to have teased out a coherent logic if [[Freud]]'s writings that no one else had perceived before. ==See Also=={{See}}* [[Ego-psychology]]* [[International Psycho-Analytical Association]]||* [[Kleinian psychoanalysis]]* [[Object-relations theory]]||* [[Psychoanalysis]]* [[School]]{{Also}}  ==References==<references/> [[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]][[Category:Dictionary|Freud, Return to]][[Category:Concepts]][[Category:Terms]][[Category:School]][[Category:Freudian psychology]] __NOTOC__
Anonymous user
Retrieved from "https://nosubject.com/Special:MobileDiff/1894...46438"

Navigation menu