5
edits
Changes
Science
,tech typo
{{Top}}scientific|science (science) Both Freud and Lacan use the term ]]''|-|| [[German]]: 'science' in the[[Wissenschaft{{Bottom}}
=====Scientific Discourse=====Both [[Freud]] and [[Lacan]] use the term "[[science]]" in the [[singular]], thus implying that there is a specific [[unified]], homogeneous kind of[[discourse]] that can be called "[[science|scientific]]".
This is what lies behind [[Lacan]]'s attempts to forget his subjectivity' (E, 70)[[formalize]] [[psychoanalytic theory]] in [[terms]] of various [[mathematical]] [[algebra|formulae]]. He also compares modern science to a 'fully
These [[Realalgebra|formulae]] also encapsulate a further characteristic of [[science|scientific discourse]]ised paranoia', in the sense which is that its totalising constructions resemble theit should be transmissible.<ref>{{TV}} p. 60</ref>.
=====Knowledge=====[[Science]] is also characterised by a particular relationship to [[knowledge]] (''[[knowledge|savoir]]''), in that [[science]] is based on the [[exclusion]] of any access to [[knowledge]] by recourse to intuition and thus forces all the [[search]] for [[knowledge]] to follow only the positivist model path of science[[reason]].<ref>{{Ec}} p. 831</ref>. Lacan implies that positivism is actually a
=====Jacques Lacan=====The question of the subject status of science (Ec, 858) Lacan is arguing that [[psychoanalysis ]] and its relationship with other disciplines is notalso one to which [[Lacan]] devotes much attention.
In the same year he states that [[psychoanalysis]] is not a [[science]] but a "practice" ('natural sciences'pratique'') with a "[[science|scientific vocation]]", Lacan prefers instead to talk <ref>{{Ec}} p. 863</ref> though in the same year he also speaks of 'the 'conjectural sciences' (or[[science|psychoanalytic science]]."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 876</ref>.