Difference between revisions of "Second Manifesto for Philosophy"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
(Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[File:Second Manifesto for Philosophy.jpg|thumb]]  
 
[[File:Second Manifesto for Philosophy.jpg|thumb]]  
 
==Book Description==
 
==Book Description==
Twenty years ago, Alain Badiou’s first ''Manifesto for Philosophy'' rose up against the all-pervasive proclamation of the “end” of philosophy. In lieu of this problematic of the end, he put forward the watchword: “one more step”.
+
Twenty years ago, [[Alain]] Badiou’s first ''Manifesto for [[Philosophy]]'' rose up against the all-pervasive proclamation of the “end” of philosophy. In lieu of this problematic of the end, he put forward the watchword: “one more step”.
  
The situation has considerably changed since then. Philosophy was threatened with obliteration at the time, whereas today it finds itself under threat for the diametrically opposed reason: it is endowed with an excessive, artificial existence. “Philosophy” is everywhere. It serves as a trademark for various media pundits. It livens up cafés and health clubs. It has its magazines and its gurus. It is universally called upon, by everything from banks to major state commissions, to pronounce on ethics, law and duty. In essence, “philosophy” has now come to stand for nothing other than its most ancient enemy: conservative ethics.
+
The [[situation]] has considerably changed since then. Philosophy was threatened with obliteration at the [[time]], whereas today it finds itself under [[threat]] for the diametrically opposed [[reason]]: it is endowed with an excessive, artificial [[existence]]. “Philosophy” is everywhere. It serves as a trademark for various [[media]] pundits. It livens up cafés and health clubs. It has its magazines and its gurus. It is universally called upon, by everything from banks to major [[state]] commissions, to pronounce on [[ethics]], law and [[duty]]. In [[essence]], “philosophy” has now come to stand for [[nothing]] [[other]] than its most ancient [[enemy]]: [[conservative]] ethics.
  
Badiou’s second manifesto therefore seeks to demoralize philosophy and to separate it from all those “philosophies” that are as servile as they are ubiquitous. It demonstrates the power of certain eternal truths to illuminate action and, as such, to transport philosophy far beyond the figure of “the human” and its “rights”. There, well beyond all moralism, in the clear expanse of the idea, life becomes something radically other than survival.
+
Badiou’s second manifesto therefore seeks to demoralize philosophy and to [[separate]] it from all those “philosophies” that are as servile as they are ubiquitous. It demonstrates the [[power]] of certain eternal truths to illuminate [[action]] and, as such, to transport philosophy far beyond the [[figure]] of “the human” and its “rights”. There, well beyond all moralism, in the clear expanse of the [[idea]], [[life]] becomes something radically other than survival.

Latest revision as of 22:43, 20 May 2019

Books by Alain Badiou

Second Manifesto for Philosophy.jpg

Book Description

Twenty years ago, Alain Badiou’s first Manifesto for Philosophy rose up against the all-pervasive proclamation of the “end” of philosophy. In lieu of this problematic of the end, he put forward the watchword: “one more step”.

The situation has considerably changed since then. Philosophy was threatened with obliteration at the time, whereas today it finds itself under threat for the diametrically opposed reason: it is endowed with an excessive, artificial existence. “Philosophy” is everywhere. It serves as a trademark for various media pundits. It livens up cafés and health clubs. It has its magazines and its gurus. It is universally called upon, by everything from banks to major state commissions, to pronounce on ethics, law and duty. In essence, “philosophy” has now come to stand for nothing other than its most ancient enemy: conservative ethics.

Badiou’s second manifesto therefore seeks to demoralize philosophy and to separate it from all those “philosophies” that are as servile as they are ubiquitous. It demonstrates the power of certain eternal truths to illuminate action and, as such, to transport philosophy far beyond the figure of “the human” and its “rights”. There, well beyond all moralism, in the clear expanse of the idea, life becomes something radically other than survival.