Difference between revisions of "Seminar I"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fixed some translation/grammar errors and hyperlink errors)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
 
{| align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"
 
|-
 
|-
| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"| [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]
+
| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]
| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|Seminar I
+
| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" |Seminar I
| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"| ''[[Seminar I|Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''
+
| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''[[Seminar I|Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''
 
[[Seminar I|<big>Freud's Papers on Technique</big>]]
 
[[Seminar I|<big>Freud's Papers on Technique</big>]]
 
|}
 
|}
Line 21: Line 21:
  
  
The first [[seminar]], open to the [[public]], takes [[place]] at [[Sainte-Anne Hospital]] just after the creation of the [[S.F.P]] ([[Société Française de Psychanalyse]]).  [[Lacan]] cuts in the study of [[Freud]] by dint of his [[theory]] on the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].  The focal point of the [[discussion]] is the direction of the [[cure]].  Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections.  Through the [[case]] histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], [[Kris]] and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]] to systematize his [[analyses]] of the [[specular relation]].  After his [[schema]] of the [[inverted bouquet]] the [[mirror stage]] becomes part of the [[topography]] of the [[Imaginary]]. As to the ''[[méconnaissance]]'' that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ''[[Verneinung]]'' (''[[dénégation]]''): "...everyday [[speech]] runs against failure of [[recognition]], ''[[méconnaissance]]'', which is the source of ''[[Verneinung]]''."  He closes the [[seminar]] pondering on the [[role]] of the [[analyst]]: "...if [[The Subject|the subject]] commits himself to searching after [[truth]] as such, it is because he places himself in the [[dimension]] of [[ignorance]], what [[analyst]]s call readiness to the [[transference]].  The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worth of consideration.  He doesn't have to [[guide]] the [[subject]] to [[knowledge]], but on to the paths by which access to this [[knowledge]] is gained.  [[Psychoanalysis]] is a [[dialectic]]s, an [[art]] of conversation."
+
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">The first [[seminar]], open to the public, takes place at Sainte-Anne Hospital just after the creation of the [[Société Française de Psychanalyse]] (S.F.P.).  [[Lacan]] intervenes in the study of [[Freud]] by deploying his concepts of the three 'registers' of subjective experience: the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].  The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]].  Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections.  Through the [[case]] histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], [[Kris]] and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]] to systematize his analyses of the [[specular relation]].  After his [[schema]] of the [[inverted bouquet]] the [[mirror stage]] becomes part of the topography of the [[Imaginary]]. As to the ''[[méconnaissance]]'' that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' (''dénégation''): "...everyday [[speech]] runs against failure of [[recognition]], ''[[méconnaissance]]'', which is the source of ''[[Verneinung]]''."  He closes the [[seminar]] pondering on the [[role]] of the [[analyst]]: ''"...if [[The Subject|the subject]] commits himself to searching after [[truth]] as such, it is because he places himself in the [[dimension]] of [[ignorance]], what [[analyst]]s call readiness to the [[transference]].  The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worthy of consideration.  He doesn't have to [[guide]] the [[subject]] to [[knowledge]], but onto the paths by which access to this [[knowledge]] is gained.  [[Psychoanalysis]] is a [[dialectic]]s, an [[art]] of conversation."''</span>
  
In a spoken [[intervention]] (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s ''[[Verneinung]]'' and suggests its [[translation]] as ''[[dénégation]]'' instead of ''[[négation]]''.  The question here deals with how the [[return]] of the [[repress]]ed operates.  According to [[Freud]] the [[repress]]ed is intellectually accepted by the [[subject]], since it is named, and at the same [[time]] is negated because the [[subject]] refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it.  ''[[Dénégation]]'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between [[neurosis]] and [[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ''[[Verdrägung]]'', and [[repudiation]], ''[[Verwerfung]]'', a term that [[Lacan]] will replace by [[withdrawal]], and finally by "[[foreclosure]]" (''[[forclusion]]''), the former [[being]] related to [[neurosis]], the latter to [[psychosis]].
+
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">In a spoken [[intervention]] (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' and suggests its [[translation]] as ''dénégation'' instead of ''négation''.  The question here deals with how the [[return of the repressed]] operates.  According to [[Freud]], the [[repress]]ed is intellectually accepted by the [[subject]], since it is named, and at the same [[time]] is negated because the [[subject]] refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize himself in it.  ''Dénégation'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between [[neurosis]] and [[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ''Verdrägung'', and [[repudiation]], ''Verwerfung'', a term that [[Lacan]] will replace with 'withdrawal', and finally with "[[foreclosure]]" (''forclusion''), the former being related to [[neurosis]], the latter to [[psychosis]].</span>
  
When answering Hyppolite in La [[Psychanalyse]] that same year, [[Lacan]] establishes two poles of [[analytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]].  [[Lacan]] gives precedence to the [[Symbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]].  The [[subject]] who must come to be is "the [[subject of the unconscious]]" and "the [[unconscious is the discourse of the Other]]."  In [[analysis]], he says, "[[The Subject|the subject]] first talks [[about]] himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."
+
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When answering Hyppolite in La [[Psychanalyse]] that same year, [[Lacan]] establishes two poles of [[analytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]].  [[Lacan]] gives precedence to the [[Symbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]].  The subject who must come to be is "the [[subject of the unconscious]]," where here it is to be understood that "the [[unconscious is the discourse of the Other]]."  In [[analysis]], he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."</span>
  
To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[Symbolic]], he opposes the intersection of the [[Symbolic]] and the [[Real]] without mediation of the [[Imaginary]], which would be the characteristic of [[psychosis]].
+
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[Symbolic]], he opposes the intersection of the [[Symbolic]] and the [[Real]] without mediation of the [[Imaginary]], which would be the characteristic of [[psychosis]].</span>
  
 
== Downloads ==
 
== Downloads ==
Line 60: Line 60:
 
|<small>23 Mb</small>
 
|<small>23 Mb</small>
 
|<big>pdf</big>
 
|<big>pdf</big>
|[http://library1.org/_ads/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/491617 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 5]
+
|[http://library1.org/_ads/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 1], [https://ulozto.net/file/9UYPScorSNa0/jacques-lacan-seminar-i-lacan-seminar-1-technique-pdf 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 3], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 4]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]]
 
|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]]
Line 130: Line 130:
 
|<small>9 Mb</small>
 
|<small>9 Mb</small>
 
|<big>pdf</big>
 
|<big>pdf</big>
|[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
+
|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
==French==
 
==French==
{|
+
{| class="floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"
 
|  
 
|  
 
{| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;margin-right:0px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
 
{| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;margin-right:0px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"
Line 213: Line 213:
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 
|}
 +
French versions of [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[Seminars]] Source: http://ecole-lacanienne.net
 +
* [[File:Seminaire_01.pdf|Download]]
 +
<BR><pdf width="450px" height="600px">File:Seminaire_01.pdf</pdf>
 +
[[Category:Seminars]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
  
[[Category:Seminars]] [[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
 
__NOTOC__  __NOAUTOLINKS__
 
__NOTOC__  __NOAUTOLINKS__

Latest revision as of 12:33, 2 March 2021

Seminar II


1953 - 1954 Seminar I Les écrits techniques de Freud

Freud's Papers on Technique

Sem.I.jpg
Seminar I
Seminar I Freud's Papers on Technique.jpg
Years: 1953 - 1954
English Title Freud's Papers on Technique


The first seminar, open to the public, takes place at Sainte-Anne Hospital just after the creation of the Société Française de Psychanalyse (S.F.P.). Lacan intervenes in the study of Freud by deploying his concepts of the three 'registers' of subjective experience: the imaginary, the symbolic and the real. The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the cure. Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections. Through the case histories of Freud, Klein, Kris and Balint, the debate elucidates on the convergence of psychoanalysis, philosophy, theology, linguistics and game theory. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, Lacan will further appeal to the science of optics to systematize his analyses of the specular relation. After his schema of the inverted bouquet the mirror stage becomes part of the topography of the Imaginary. As to the méconnaissance that characterizes the ego, it is associated with Verneinung (dénégation): "...everyday speech runs against failure of recognition, méconnaissance, which is the source of Verneinung." He closes the seminar pondering on the role of the analyst: "...if the subject commits himself to searching after truth as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what analysts call readiness to the transference. The analyst's ignorance is also worthy of consideration. He doesn't have to guide the subject to knowledge, but onto the paths by which access to this knowledge is gained. Psychoanalysis is a dialectics, an art of conversation."

In a spoken intervention (Appendix), Jean Hyppolite comments on Freud's Verneinung and suggests its translation as dénégation instead of négation. The question here deals with how the return of the repressed operates. According to Freud, the repressed is intellectually accepted by the subject, since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the subject refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize himself in it. Dénégation includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between neurosis and psychosis is drawn here, between repression, Verdrägung, and repudiation, Verwerfung, a term that Lacan will replace with 'withdrawal', and finally with "foreclosure" (forclusion), the former being related to neurosis, the latter to psychosis.

When answering Hyppolite in La Psychanalyse that same year, Lacan establishes two poles of analytic experience: the imaginary ego and the symbolic speech. Lacan gives precedence to the Symbolic over the Imaginary. The subject who must come to be is "the subject of the unconscious," where here it is to be understood that "the unconscious is the discourse of the Other." In analysis, he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."

To this reshaping of the Imaginary by the Symbolic, he opposes the intersection of the Symbolic and the Real without mediation of the Imaginary, which would be the characteristic of psychosis.

Downloads

Author(s) Title Publisher Year Pages Language Size Filetype Downloads
Jacques Lacan The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)

9780393306972

W. W. Norton & Company 1991 312 English 4 Mb djvu 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Jacques Lacan The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I) W. W. Norton & Company 1991 312 English 23 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4
Jacques Lacan Das Seminar von Jacques Lacan Buch 1 (1953-1954)

Freuds technische Schriften 9783530502138, 3530502138

Walter 1978 364[363] German 9 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Related

Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture

Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud

State University of New York Press 1996 460

[445]

English 3 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture

Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud

State University of New York Press 1996 445 English 7 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Richard Boothby Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan's Return to Freud [1 ed.] Routledge 1991 276 English 4 Mb djvu 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Jacques Lacan La cosa freudiana e altri scritti Einaudi 1972 252 Italian 8 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Jacques Lacan Das Seminar von Jacques Lacan Buch 1 (1953-1954)

Freuds technische Schriften 9783530502138, 3530502138

Walter 1978 364[363] German 9 Mb pdf 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

French

Date PDF
18 novembre 1953 pdf
13 janvier 1954 pdf
20 janvier 1954 pdf
27 janvier 1954 pdf
3 février 1954 pdf
10 février 1954 pdf
17 février 1954 pdf
24 février 1954 pdf
10 mars 1954 pdf
17 mars 1954 pdf
24 mars 1954 pdf
31 mars 1954 pdf
7 avril 1954 pdf
5 mai 1954 pdf
12 mai 1954 pdf
19 mai 1954 pdf
26 mai 1954 pdf
2 juin 1954 pdf
9 juin 1954 pdf
16 juin 1954 pdf
23 juin 1954 pdf
30 juin 1954 pdf
7 juillet 1954 pdf

French versions of Lacan's Seminars Source: http://ecole-lacanienne.net


You do not have permission to embed PDF files.